DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Increasing trend of endoscopic drainage utilization for the management of pancreatic pseudocyst: insights from a nationwide database

  • Khaled Elfert (Department of Internal Medicine, SBH Health System) ;
  • Salomon Chamay (Department of Internal Medicine, SBH Health System) ;
  • Lamin Dos Santos (Department of Internal Medicine, SBH Health System) ;
  • Mouhand Mohamed (Department of Internal Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University) ;
  • Azizullah Beran (Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine) ;
  • Fouad Jaber (Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine) ;
  • Hazem Abosheaishaa (Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) ;
  • Suresh Nayudu (Division of Gastroenterology, SBH Health System) ;
  • Sammy Ho (Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.16
  • 심사 : 2023.05.03
  • 발행 : 2024.01.30

초록

Background/Aims: The pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) is a type of fluid collection that typically develops as a delayed complication of acute pancreatitis. Drainage is indicated for symptomatic patients and/or associated complications, such as infection and bleeding. Drainage modalities include percutaneous, endoscopic, laparoscopic, and open drainage. This study aimed to assess trends in the utilization of different drainage modalities for treating PP from 2016 to 2020. The trends in mortality, mean length of hospital stay, and mean hospitalization costs were also assessed. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database was used to obtain data. The variables were generated using International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic and procedural codes. Results: Endoscopic drainage was the most commonly used drainage modality in 2018-2020, with an increasing trend over time (385 procedures in 2018 to 515 in 2020; p=0.003). This is associated with a decrease in the use of other drainage modalities. A decrease in the hospitalization cost for PP requiring drainage was also noted (29,318 United States dollar [USD] in 2016 to 18,087 USD in 2020, p<0.001). Conclusions: Endoscopic drainage is becoming the most commonly used modality for the treatment of PP in hospitals located in the US. This new trend is associated with decreasing hospitalization costs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Muthusamy VR, Chandrasekhara V, et al. The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory pancreatic fluid collections. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:481-488.
  2. Farias GF, Bernardo WM, De Moura DT, et al. Endoscopic versus surgical treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts: systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e14255.
  3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-HCUP a federal-state-industry partnership [Internet]. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 5]. Available from: https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NISIntroduction2020.pdf.
  4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) NIS Notes: bedsize of hospital [Internet]. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008 [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_bedsize/nisnote.jsp.
  5. Wang Y, Omar YA, Agrawal R, et al. Comparison of treatment modalities in pancreatic pseudocyst: a population based study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2019;11:365-372. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v11.i9.365
  6. Rebhun J, Nassani N, Pan A, et al. Outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and percutaneous drainage of infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis: a nationwide inpatient sample study. Cureus 2021;13:e12972.
  7. Habashi S, Draganov PV. Pancreatic pseudocyst. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:38-47. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.38
  8. Tyberg A, Karia K, Gabr M, et al. Management of pancreatic fluid collections: a comprehensive review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:2256-2270. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2256
  9. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, et al. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2013;145:583-590. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.046
  10. Zhao X, Feng T, Ji W. Endoscopic versus surgical treatment for pancreatic pseudocyst. Dig Endosc 2016;28:83-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12542