DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Experiences from a Vietnamese center

  • Khai Viet Ninh (Organ Transplantation Center, Viet Duc University Hospital) ;
  • Dang Hai Do (Organ Transplantation Center, Viet Duc University Hospital) ;
  • Trung Duc Nguyen (Department of General Surgery, Hanoi Medical University) ;
  • Phuong Ha Tran (Organ Transplantation Center, Viet Duc University Hospital) ;
  • Tuan Hoang (Organ Transplantation Center, Viet Duc University Hospital) ;
  • Dung Thanh Le (Medical Imaging & Nuclear Medicine Center, Viet Duc University Hospital) ;
  • Nghia Quang Nguyen (Organ Transplantation Center, Viet Duc University Hospital)
  • Received : 2023.06.12
  • Accepted : 2023.09.27
  • Published : 2024.02.29

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Liver transplantation (LT) provides a favorable outcome for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and was launched in Vietnam in 2004. In this study, we evaluated the short-term and long-term outcomes of LT and its risk factors. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed HCC patients who underwent LT at Viet Duc University hospital, Vietnam, from 01/2012-03/2022. The following data were gathered: demographics, virus infection, tumor characteristics, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, Child-Pugh and MELD scores, selection criteria, type of LT, complications, 30-day mortality, and disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS). Results: Fifty four patients were included, the mean age was 55.39 ± 8.46 years. Nearly 90% had hepatitis B virus-related HCC. The median (interquartile range) AFP level was 16.2 (88.7) ng/mL. The average MELD score was 10.57 ± 5.95; the rate of Child-Pugh A and B were 70.4% and 18.5%, respectively. Nearly 40% of the patients were within Milan criteria, brain-dead donor was 83.3%. Hepatic and portal vein thrombosis occurred in 0% and 1.9%, respectively; hepatic artery thrombosis 1.9%, biliary leakage 5.6%, and postoperative hemorrhage 3.7%. Ninety-day mortality was 5.6%. Five-year DFS and OS were 79.3% and 81.4%, respectively. MELD score and ChildPugh score were predictive factors for DFS and OS (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, Child-Pugh score was the only significant factor (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In Vietnam, LT is an effective therapy for HCC with an acceptable complication rate, mortality rate, and good survival outcomes, and should be further encouraged.

Keywords

References

  1. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2012;379:1245-1255.
  2. Baecker A, Liu X, La Vecchia C, Zhang ZF. Worldwide incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma cases attributable to major risk factors. Eur J Cancer Prev 2018;27:205-212.
  3. Anh PT, Parkin DM, Hanh NT, Duc NB. Cancer in the population of Hanoi, Vietnam, 1988-1990. Br J Cancer 1993;68:1236-1242.
  4. Nguyen VT. Hepatitis B infection in Vietnam: current issues and future challenges. Asia Pac J Public Health 2012;24:361-373.
  5. Yoon YI, Lee SG. Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an Asian perspective. Dig Dis Sci 2019;64:993-1000.
  6. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996;334:693-700.
  7. Yao FY, Xiao L, Bass NM, Kerlan R, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: validation of the UCSF-expanded criteria based on preoperative imaging. Am J Transplant 2007;7:2587-2596.
  8. de Villa V, Lo CM. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia. Oncologist 2007;12:1321-1331.
  9. Pham PH, Phan NP, Tran VDK, Dang VQ, Le DT, Nguyen TD, et al. The first years of liver transplantation: experiences at a single center. Korean J Transplant 2022;36:119-126.
  10. Nguyen TC, Robert A, Nguyen PV, Nguyen NM, Truong DQ, Goyens P, et al. Current status and actual need for pediatric liver transplantation in Southern Vietnam. Pediatr Transplant 2016;20:215-221.
  11. Ledinh H. Landmarks in clinical solid organ transplantation in Vietnam. Transplant Proc 2011;43:3408-3411.
  12. Sinh TN, Mackie FE, Ninh LH, Thuy HTD. Attitude towards deceased donation in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Nephrology (Carlton) 2019;24:1077-1080.
  13. Lee J, Lee JG, Jung I, Joo DJ, Kim SI, Kim MS. Development of a Korean liver allocation system using model for end stage liver disease scores: a nationwide, multicenter study. Sci Rep 2019;9:7495.
  14. Mazzaferro V, Sposito C, Zhou J, Pinna AD, De Carlis L, Fan J, et al. Metroticket 2.0 model for analysis of competing risks of death after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2018;154:128-139.
  15. Daugaard TR, Pommergaard HC, Rostved AA, Rasmussen A. Postoperative complications as a predictor for survival after liver transplantation - proposition of a prognostic score. HPB (Oxford) 2018;20:815-822.
  16. Khalaf H. Vascular complications after deceased and living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc 2010;42:865-870.
  17. Nemes B, Gaman G, Doros A. Biliary complications after liver transplantation. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;9:447-466.
  18. Reese PP, Yeh H, Thomasson AM, Shults J, Markmann JF. Transplant center volume and outcomes after liver retransplantation. Am J Transplant 2009;9:309-317.