DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Textbook Outcome of Delta-Shaped Anastomosis in Minimally Invasive Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in 4,505 Consecutive Patients

  • Seul-Gi Oh (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Suin Lee (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Ba Ool Seong (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Chang Seok Ko (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Sa-Hong Min (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung Sik Gong (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Beom Su Kim (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Moon-Won Yoo (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong Hwan Yook (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • In-Seob Lee (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2024.05.30
  • Accepted : 2024.06.24
  • Published : 2024.07.01

Abstract

Purpose: Textbook outcome is a comprehensive measure used to assess surgical quality and is increasingly being recognized as a valuable evaluation tool. Delta-shaped anastomosis (DA), an intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy, is a viable option for minimally invasive distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. This study aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes and calculate the textbook outcome of DA. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, the records of 4,902 patients who underwent minimally invasive distal gastrectomy for DA between 2009 and 2020 were reviewed. The data were categorized into three phases to analyze the trends over time. Surgical outcomes, including the operation time, length of post-operative hospital stay, and complication rates, were assessed, and the textbook outcome was calculated. Results: Among 4,505 patients, the textbook outcome is achieved in 3,736 (82.9%). Post-operative complications affect the textbook outcome the most significantly (91.9%). The highest textbook outcome is achieved in phase 2 (85.0%), which surpasses the rates of in phase 1 (81.7%) and phase 3 (82.3%). The post-operative complication rate within 30 d after surgery is 8.7%, and the rate of major complications exceeding the Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3 is 2.4%. Conclusions: Based on the outcomes of a large dataset, DA can be considered safe and feasible for gastric cancer.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We extend our gratitude to Professor Byung-Sik Kim for his invaluable contributions to this study. We thank Mrs. Chang-Geun Heo, Chun-Myoung Ji, Du-Gi Pin, and Yuyeong Choi for their assistance in this study.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-249.
  2. Kim TH, Kim IH, Kang SJ, Choi M, Kim BH, Eom BW, et al. Korean practice guidelines for gastric cancer 2022: an evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach. J Gastric Cancer 2023;23:3-106.
  3. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2021 (6th edition). Gastric Cancer 2023;26:1-25.
  4. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 2016;263:28-35.
  5. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, et al. Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer: the KLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:506-513.
  6. Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Park YK, An JY, et al. Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg 2019;270:983-991. 
  7. Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Park YK, Lee HJ, An JY, Kim W, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: The KLASS-02-RCT randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:3304-3313.
  8. Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019;321:1983-1992.
  9. Huang C, Liu H, Hu Y, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, et al. Laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: five-year outcomes from the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2022;157:9-17.
  10. Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H, Tamaki N, Isobe H, Katayama T, et al. Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:284-287.
  11. Kim BS, Yook JH, Choi YB, Kim KC, Kim MG, Kim TH, et al. Comparison of early outcomes of intracorporeal and extracorporeal gastroduodenostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011;21:387-391.
  12. Lee HH, Song KY, Lee JS, Park SM, Kim JJ. Delta-shaped anastomosis, a good substitute for conventional Billroth I technique with comparable long-term functional outcome in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2015;29:2545-2552.
  13. Kim YN, An JY, Choi YY, Choi MG, Lee JH, Sohn TS, et al. Short-term outcomes of intracorporeal delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy versus extracorporeal gastroduodenostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer 2019;19:111-120.
  14. Harada J, Kinoshita T, Sato R, Akimoto E, Yoshida M, Nishiguchi Y. Delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparative study of original and modified methods. Surg Endosc 2021;35:4167-4174.
  15. Li J, Ge YG, Yang YF, Zhang J. Comparison of delta-shaped anastomosis and Billroth I reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021;12:259-267.
  16. Sakaguchi M, Hosogi H, Tokoro Y, Yagi D, Shimoike N, Akagawa S, et al. Functional outcomes of deltashaped anastomosis after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2021;25:397-404.
  17. Park SH, Man Yoon H, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Han M, Eom BW. Long-term functional and patient-reported outcomes between intra-corporeal delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy and gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer 2023;23:561-573.
  18. Matsuhashi N, Yamaguchi K, Okumura N, Tanahashi T, Matsui S, Imai H, et al. The technical outcomes of delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a single-center safety and feasibility study. Surg Endosc 2017;31:1257-1263.
  19. Kolfschoten NE, Kievit J, Gooiker GA, van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Eddes EH, et al. Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; hospital variations in 'textbook outcome'. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:156-163.
  20. Busweiler LA, Schouwenburg MG, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Kolfschoten NE, de Jong PC, Rozema T, et al. Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2017;104:742-750. 
  21. van der Kaaij RT, de Rooij MV, van Coevorden F, Voncken FE, Snaebjornsson P, Boot H, et al. Using textbook outcome as a measure of quality of care in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2018;105:561-569.
  22. Levy J, Gupta V, Amirazodi E, Allen-Ayodabo C, Jivraj N, Jeong Y, et al. Gastrectomy case volume and textbook outcome: an analysis of the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario (PRESTO). Gastric Cancer 2020;23:391-402.
  23. Dal Cero M, Roman M, Grande L, Yarnoz C, Estremiana F, Gantxegi A, et al. Textbook outcome and survival after gastric cancer resection with curative intent: a population-based analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022;48:768-775.
  24. Realis Luc M, de Pascale S, Ascari F, Bonomi AM, Bertani E, Cella CA, et al. Textbook outcome as indicator of surgical quality in a single Western center: results from 300 consecutive gastrectomies. Updates Surg 2023;
  25. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.
  26. Aquina CT, Hamad A, Becerra AZ, Cloyd JM, Tsung A, Pawlik TM, et al. Is textbook oncologic outcome a valid hospital-quality metric after high-risk surgical oncology procedures? Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:8028-8045. 
  27. Ten Berge MG, Beck N, Steup WH, Verhagen AFTM, van Brakel TJ, Schreurs WH, et al. Textbook outcome as a composite outcome measure in non-small-cell lung cancer surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021;59:92-99.
  28. Gorgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Lanari J, Russolillo N, Cipriani F, Aghayan D, et al. Assessment of textbook outcome in laparoscopic and open liver surgery. JAMA Surg 2021;156:e212064.
  29. Kamarajah SK, Griffiths EA, Phillips AW, Ruurda J, van Hillegersberg R, Hofstetter WL, et al. Robotic techniques in esophagogastric cancer surgery: an assessment of short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2022;29:2812-2825.
  30. Sedlak K, Rawicz-Pruszynski K, Mlak R, Van Sandick J, Gisbertz S, Pera M, et al. Textbook oncological outcome in European GASTRODATA. Ann Surg 2023;278:823-831.
  31. Roh CK, Lee S, Son SY, Hur H, Han SU. Textbook outcome and survival of robotic versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matched cohort study. Sci Rep 2021;11:15394.