DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aspects of Intellectual Freedom Restrictions in Libraries and Countermeasures

도서관 지적자유 침해 양상과 대처방안

  • 김신영 (대구대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2024.05.17
  • Accepted : 2024.06.04
  • Published : 2024.06.30

Abstract

This study analyzes various recent aspects of intellectual freedom restrictions in the domestic libraries, identifies difficulties facing librarians in the field, and suggests countermeasures. Specifically, we conducted literature research, including the definition and declaration of library intellectual freedom in core documents by domestic and international expert groups, the background of selection of 'Nadaum Children's Book', which is at the center of controversy, and analysis of previous research. Next, we investigated the patterns of intellectual freedom restrictions committed in libraries, difficulties encountered in the field, and cases of response at the individual library level among librarians. In addition, we surveyed the level of perception in the field about countermeasures against intellectual freedom restrictions at the level of associations and expert groups and future plans to guarantee intellectual freedom. Finally, based on this, countermeasures against restrictions of intellectual freedom were proposed at the level of the National Library Committee, the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, associations and expert groups, and individual libraries.

본 연구는 최근 국내 도서관계에서 행해지는 지적자유 침해의 다양한 행태를 분석하고 현장 사서의 애로사항을 파악하여 그 대처방안을 제시하고자 한다. 구체적으로 국내외 전문가 단체의 관련 선언문에 나타난 도서관 지적자유의 정의와 선언, 논란의 중심에 있는 나다움어린이책의 선정 배경 및 선행연구 분석 등 문헌 연구를 수행하였다. 다음으로 사서를 대상으로 소속 도서관에 행해지는 지적자유 침해와 현장의 애로사항 및 개별 도서관 차원의 대응 사례를 조사하였다. 또한 협회·전문가 단체 차원의 지적자유 침해에 대한 대처방안, 향후 지적자유 보장 방안 등에 대한 현장의 인식도를 조사하였다. 도서관 지적자유 침해 상황이 복잡·다양한 가운데 협회·전문가 차원의 성명서는 법적 효력이 없으므로 실효성을 담보하기 위한 법적 근거의 마련과 도서관 현장에서 상황별로 적용할 수 있는 대응 매뉴얼의 작성도 시급하다. 따라서 이러한 상황을 바탕으로 국가도서관위원회, 문화체육관광부, 협회·전문가 단체, 개별 도서관 차원에서 지적자유 침해에 대한 대처방안을 제안하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2022학년도 대구대학교 학술연구비 지원으로 수행되었음.

References

  1. Bae, Kyung Jae (2022). A field perception and agenda of intellectual freedom and censorship issues in library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 56(2), 277-294. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2022.56.2.277
  2. Chang, Durk Hyun (2011). Intellectual freedom issues in library collection development. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.1.201103.165
  3. Illinois, U.S., decides not to provide state support to libraries that censor books... first in the country. (2023, June 14). Yonhap News, Available: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20230614005300009
  4. Japan Library Association (1979). Declaration on Library Freedom. Available: https://www.jla.or.jp/library/gudeline/tabid/232/Default.aspx
  5. Jung, Hyun Tae (2000). A Study on the Intellectual Freedom in Korean Public Libraries. Doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Yonsei University, Department of Library and Information Science.
  6. Kang, Soo-Hwan (2024, March 18). Academic advocacy groups protest against conclusion that 'there is no problem' for books controversial about harmfulness. Yonhap News, Available: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20240318134500063
  7. Kim, Dae You (2021). A study on the controversy over the selectivity of children's sex education books. The Korean Journal of Health Education, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/11.36031/KJHE.7.1 https://doi.org/10.36031/KJHE.7.1
  8. Kim, Hae-Sun (1994). A Study on Ethics of Librarianship. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Ewha Woman's University, Department of Library and Information Science.
  9. Kwack, Dong Chul (1986). A Study on Censorship and Intellectual Freedom in Korean Libraries under the Japanese Rule. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Yonsei University, Department of Library and Information Science.
  10. Lee, Myeong-Hee (2004). Libraries' efforts to preserve intellectual freedom and baned books. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 15(1), 193-216. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO200429535567995.pdf
  11. Lee, Seohyeon (2017). A study on PR activities of banned books week of the American Library Association: focusing on challenged books. Studies of Korean Science, 43(4), 187-230. https://doi.org/10.21732/skps.2017.80.187
  12. Lim, Yeojoo (2023). An exploratory study of the publication and use of sexuality education books for youth. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 34(2), 205-232. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2022.33.1.425
  13. Min, Jeong-Hee (2020, August 31). Ministry of Gender Equality and Family withdraws after controversy over sex education book... women's group "Forgetting the reason for existence". KBS News. Available: https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/pc/view/view.do?ncd=4529002
  14. Ministry of Gender Equality and Family (2019, July 1). Criteria for selecting 'Nadaum Children's Books' that respect diversity and foster gender sensitivity prepared, Press release. Available: https://www.mogef.go.kr/nw/rpd/nw_rpd_s001d.do?mid=news405&bbtSn=706434
  15. Sohn, Yeon-Ok (1996). A study on the professional ethical relationship between librarian and library work. Annual Review of Library and Information Science, 24, 485-515.
  16. Watanabe, Sigeo (2001). Library and intellectual freedom. The Library World, 53(3), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.20628/toshokankai.53.3_191
  17. Yoon, GeunHyuk (2023, November 11). Sex education controversial book, take action... Gyeonggi Office of Education, official document controversy. OhmyNews, Available: https://omn.kr/26dc7
  18. American Library Association (1939). Library Bill of Rights. Available: https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill
  19. American Library Association (2023, March 20). Book Ban Data, Available: http://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/book-ban-data
  20. American Library Association (2024, March 4). Censorship by the Numbers. Available: http://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/by-the-numbers
  21. Australian Library and Information Association (2018). Free Access to Information Statement, Available: https://read.alia.org.au/alia-free-access-information-statement
  22. Canadian Librarian Association (2019). Intellectual Freedom Position Statement. Available: https://cfla-fcab.ca/en/guidelines-and-position-papers/statement-on-intellectual-freedom-and-libraries/
  23. CILIP (2005). Intellectual Freedom, Access to Information and Censorship. Available: https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/faife/statements/lastat.pdf
  24. CILIP (2022). Intellectual Freedom, Freedom of Access to Information and Freedom of Expression for Librarians and Information Professionals. Available: http://www.cilip.org.uk/resource/resmgr/cilip/policy/intellectual_freedom/intellect_free_policy_v1.pdf
  25. Garnar, Martin (2021). Intellectual Freedom Manual (10th ed.). Chicago: American Library Association.
  26. IFLA (1999). IFLA Statement on Libraries and Intellectual Freedom. Available: https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/1441
  27. Illinois Government. (2023, June 12). Press Release. Gov. Pritzker Signs Bill Making Illinois First State in the Nation to Outlaw Book Bans. Available: https://www.illinois.gov/news/press-release.26575.html
  28. Illinois Public Act 103-0100. Available: https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/103/PDF/103-0100.pdf
  29. NBCC (2024, March 21). National Book Critics Circle Announces Finalists for Publishing Year 2023. Available: https://www.bookcritics.org/2024/01/25/national-book-critics-circle-announces-finalists-for-publishing-year-2023/
  30. Netherlands Association of Librarians (1993). Professional Charter for Librarians in Public Libraries. Available: https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/faife/codesofethics//netherlands.pdf
  31. Spanish Association for Documentation and Information (2013). Code of Ethics for Librarians and Informational Professionals. Available: https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/faife/codesofethics/spain-nationalcodeofethics.pdf