DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effect of Insolvency of a Party to an Arbitration Agreement on the Arbitration

중재합의 당사자의 파산이 중재에 미치는 영향에 관한 고찰

  • 강수미 (연세대학교 법학전문대학원)
  • Received : 2024.05.03
  • Accepted : 2024.05.27
  • Published : 2024.06.01

Abstract

The insolvency proceedings, which are collective debt processing procedures that equitably distribute properties of the debtor who is declared insolvency to multiple creditors, and the arbitral proceedings that resolve disputes over individual legal relationships between the parties differ in nature. However, there are no express provisions that directly regulate the legal relationships when the party to an arbitration agreement is declared insolvency. The presence of an arbitration agreement between the parties does not necessarily initiate the arbitral proceedings, the arbitral proceedings are initiated by the parties' application under the arbitration agreement. It is also necessary to examine the effect of the insolvency of the party to the arbitration agreement on the arbitral proceedings step by step. This paper reviews the cases in which the parties to the arbitration agreement have been declared insolvency before the commencement of the arbitral proceedings and have been declared insolvency during the arbitral proceedings. This paper examines how the effect of the arbitration agreement affects the insolvency proceedings when the debtor is declared insolvency after concluding the arbitration agreement and how the declaration of insolvency affects the arbitral proceedings when the debtor, who is a party to the arbitration agreement, is declared insolvency during the arbitration proceedings.

Keywords

References

  1. 권순일 편, 「주석 채무자회생법(IV)」, 한국사법행정학회, 2021.
  2. 권순일 편, 「주석 채무자회생법(V)」, 한국사법행정학회, 2021.
  3. 김경욱, "중재당사자의 파산이 중재절차에 미치는 영향-국내 중재.파산절차에 한정하여", 「민사소송」 제10권 제2호, 한국민사소송법학회, 2006.
  4. 오창석, "파산절차에 있어서의 중재합의의 효력과 중재절차", 「중재연구」 제15권제1호, 한국중재학회, 2005.
  5. 임치용, "파산절차의 개시가 중재절차에 미치는 효력", 「사법논집」 제41집, 법원도서관, 2005.
  6. 전병서, 「도산법(제5판)」, 박영사, 2024.
  7. 中村達也, 「仲裁法の論点」, 成文堂, 2017.
  8. 福永有利, "仲裁契約當事者の破産と仲裁契約の效力", 「破産法硏究」, 信山社, 2004.
  9. Gundlach, Ulf.Frenzel, Volkhard.Schmidt, Nikolaus, Blick ins Insolvenzrecht, DStR 2004, 647.
  10. Hasemeyer, Ludwig, Insolvenzrecht, 3. Aufl., Carl Heymanns, 2003.
  11. Heidbrink, Alfried.von der Groeben, Marie-Christine Grafin, "Insolvenz und Schiedsverfahren", ZIP 2006, 265.
  12. Kirchhof, Hans-Peter, in: Munchener Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung, Bd. 2, C.H.Beck, 2002.
  13. Kro , Stefan, "Arbitration and Insolvency Proceedings-Selected Problems", in: Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2006.
  14. Lachmann, Jens-Peter, Handbuch fur die Schiedsgerichtspraxis, 2. Aufl., Dr. Otto Schmidt, 2002.
  15. Lazic, Vesna, Insolvency Proceedings and Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 1998.
  16. Schutze, Rolf A..Tscherning, Dieter.Wais, Walter, Handbuch des Schiedsverfahrens, 2. Aufl., Walter de Gruyter, 1990.
  17. Schwab, Karl Heinz.Walter, Gehard, Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, 7. Aufl., C.H.Beck, 2005.
  18. Vorburger, Simon, International Arbitration and Cross-Border Insolvency: Comparative Perspective, Kluwer Law International, 2014.