한국의료질향상학회지 (Quality Improvement in Health Care)

  • 제30권1호
  • /
  • Pages.132-152
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1225-7613(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-078X(eISSN)
한국의료질향상학회 (Korean Society for Quality in Health Care)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

예비 간호인력 대상 다학제 전문직 간 교육 중재 연구의 체계적 문헌고찰: 동아시아권 국가 연구를 중심으로

Systematic review on interprofessional education for pre-licensure nursing student in East Asia

  • 임희진 (연세대학교 간호대학, 4단계 두뇌한국(BK)21 S-L.E.A.P 미래간호인재 교육연구단) ;
  • 김화인 (연세대학교 ) ;
  • 김민지 (연세대학교 의과대학 임상실기교육센터) ;
  • 이승은 (연세대학교 간호대학)
  • Heejin Lim (College of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University) ;
  • Hwa In Kim (College of Nursing, Yonsei University) ;
  • Minji Kim (Clinical Simulation Center, College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Seung Eun Lee (College of Nursing, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2024.03.31
  • 심사 : 2024.06.04
  • 발행 : 2024.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to identify and evaluate interprofessional education (IPE) interventions for healthcare professional students in East Asian countries. Methods: The reporting of this study followed the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A literature search was conducted using seven electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists were also used to appraise the quality of the included studies. The outcomes of IPE interventions were classified based on a modified Kirkpatrick model. Results: This review included 30 studies predominantly conducted in Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. The prevalent research design was a one-group pre-posttest design, and most IPE interventions occurred as single events. Approximately 70% of the studies involved students from two healthcare professions, mainly nursing and medicine. Simulations, group discussions, and lectures have emerged as the most common teaching methodologies, with almost half of the studies leveraging a combination of these techniques. The IPE content primarily focused on interprofessional teamwork, communication, and clinical patient care situations; these included the management of septic shock. The effectiveness of the IPE interventions was mainly evaluated through self-reported measures, indicating improvements in attitudes, perceptions, knowledge, and skills, aligning with Level 2 of the modified Kirkpatrick model. Nonetheless, the reviewed studies did not assess changes in the participants' behavior and patient results. Conclusion: IPE interventions promise to enhance interprofessional collaboration and communication skills among health professional students. Future studies should implement rigorous designs to assess the effectiveness of IPE interventions. Moreover, when designing IPE interventions, researchers and educators should consider the role of cultural characteristics in East Asian countries.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (No. RS-2023-00208138. Heejin Lim received a scholarship from Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project funded by NRF, Yonsei University College of Nursing.

참고문헌

  1. World Health Organization. Patient safety [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/patient-safety. 
  2. Lee SI. Approaches to improve patient safety in healthcare organizations. Journal of Korean Medical Association. 2015;58(2):90-2. 
  3. World Health Organization. Global patient safety action plan 2021-2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2021. 
  4. Goldsberry JW. Advanced practice nurses leading the way: interprofessional collaboration. Nurse Education Today. 2018;65:1-3. 
  5. Ho JT, See MTA, Tan AJQ, Levett-Jones T, Lau TC, Zhou W, et al. Healthcare professionals' experiences of interprofessional collaboration in patient education: a systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2023;116:107965. 
  6. House S, Havens D. Nurses' and physicians' perceptions of nurse-physician collaboration: a systematic review. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2017;47(3):165-71. 
  7. Joint Commission. Sentinel event data 2022 annual review. Illinois, United States of America: Joint Commission; 2023. 
  8. Jung H, Park KH, Min YH, Ji E. The effectiveness of interprofessional education programs for medical, nursing, and pharmacy students. Korean Journal of Medical Education. 2020;32(2):131-42. 
  9. Lee SE, Choi J, Lee H, Sang S, Lee H, Hong HC. Factors influencing nurses' willingness to speak up regarding patient safety in east Asia: a systematic review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy. 2021;14:1053-63. 
  10. Labrague LJ, Al Sabei S, Al Rawajfah O, AbuAlRub R, Burney I. Interprofessional collaboration as a mediator in the relationship between nurse work environment, patient safety outcomes and job satisfaction among nurses. Journal of Nursing Management. 2022;30(1):268-78. 
  11. Park H, Cho J, Chu SH. Interprofessional education programs for nursing students: a systematic review. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2018;24(3):235-49. 
  12. Kemp S, Brewer M. Early stages of learning in interprofessional education: stepping towards collective competence for healthcare teams. BMC Medical Education. 2023;23(1):694. 
  13. World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. 
  14. Saragih ID, Arna Uly Tarihoran DET, Sharma S, Chou FH. A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of interprofessional education for healthcare students from seven countries. Nurse Education in Practice. 2023;71:103683. 
  15. van Diggele C, Roberts C, Burgess A, Mellis C. Interprofessional education: tips for design and implementation. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20(Suppl 2):455. 
  16. Matziou V, Vlahioti E, Perdikaris P, Matziou T, Megapanou E, Petsios K. Physician and nursing perceptions concerning interprofessional communication and collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2014;28(6):526-33. 
  17. Kreuter MW, McClure SM. The role of culture in health communication. Annual Review of Public Health. 2004;25:439-55. 
  18. Kukko P, Silen-Lipponen M, Saaranen T. Health care students' perceptions about learning of affective interpersonal communication competence in interprofessional simulations. Nurse Education Today. 2020;94:104565. 
  19. Yune SJ, Park KH, Min YH, Ji E. Perception of interprofessional education and educational needs of students in South Korea: a comparative study. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0243378. 
  20. Cho GH. The Confucian origin of the east Asian collectivism. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology. 2007;21(4):21-53. 
  21. Cho GH. A psychological inquiry into the Confucian origins of east Asian collectivism. Korean Social Sciences Review. 2011;1(1):37-103. 
  22. Lestari E. Community based interprofessional learning promotes equality of participation among health professions students. Online Journal of Health Allied Sciences. 2018;17(2). 
  23. Omura M, Stone TE, Levett-Jones T. Cultural factors influencing Japanese nurses' assertive communication. Part 1: collectivism. Nursing and Health Sciences. 2018;20(3):283-8. 
  24. Omura M, Stone TE, Levett-Jones T. Cultural factors influencing Japanese nurses' assertive communication: part 2 - hierarchy and power. Nursing and Health Sciences. 2018;20(3):289-95. 
  25. Kapoor S, Mohanty V, Y Balappanavar A, Chahar P, Rijhwani K. Primary health care workforce in southeast Asia region, existing status and strategies for non-communicable diseases and oral health alliance: a scoping review. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e22362. 
  26. Au S. The outcomes of interprofessional education in prelicensure nursing education: an integrative review. Nurse Education Today. 2023;121:105703. 
  27. Labrague LJ, McEnroe-Petitte DM, Fronda DC, Obeidat AA. Interprofessional simulation in undergraduate nursing program: an integrative review. Nurse Education Today. 2018;67:46-55. 
  28. Reeves S, Fletcher S, Barr H, Birch I, Boet S, Davies N, et al. A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39. Medical Teacher. 2016;38(7):656-68. 
  29. Sezgin MG, Bektas H. Effectiveness of interprofessional simulation-based education programs to improve teamwork and communication for students in the healthcare profession: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nurse Education Today. 2023;120:105619. 
  30. Spaulding EM, Marvel FA, Jacob E, Rahman A, Hansen BR, Hanyok LA, et al. Interprofessional education and collaboration among healthcare students and professionals: a systematic review and call for action. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2021;35(4):612-21. 
  31. Riskiyana R, Claramita M, Rahayu GR. Objectively measured interprofessional education outcome and factors that enhance program effectiveness: a systematic review. Nurse Education Today. 2018;66:73-8. 
  32. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal. 2021;372:n160. 
  33. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (KR). Northeast Asia [Internet]. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (KR); [cited 2023 Aug 1]. Available from: https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/wpge/m_24221/contents.do. 
  34. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (KR). Southeast Asia [Internet]. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (KR); [cited 2023 Aug 1]. Available from: https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/wpge/m_24222/contents.do. 
  35. Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Systematic reviews of effectiveness [Internet]. Adelaide, Australia: Jonna Briggs Institute; 2020 [cited 2023 Nov 9]. Available from: https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/355827955/4.+Systematic+reviews+of+effectiveness. 
  36. Barker TH, Habibi N, Aromataris E, Stone JC, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, et al. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2024;10.11124.  10
  37. Park JH, Kim HJ. Characteristics and effects of fall prevention interventions among the Korean older adults: a systematic review. Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing. 2022;24(1):65-84. 
  38. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;52(5):546-53. 
  39. Hammick M, Freeth D, Koppel I, Reeves S, Barr H. A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9. Medical Teacher. 2007;29(8):735-51. 
  40. Barr H, Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, Reeves S. Evaluations of interprofessional education: a United Kingdom review for health and social care. London, United Kingdom Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education with the British Educational Research Association; 2000. 
  41. Kitema GF, Laidlaw A, O'Carroll V, Sagahutu JB, Blaikie A. The status and outcomes of interprofessional health education in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2024;38(1):133-55. 
  42. Phua J, Lim C-M, Faruq MO, Nafees KMK, Du B, Gomersall CD, et al. The story of critical care in Asia: a narrative review. Journal of Intensive Care. 2021;9(1):6. 
  43. Baggs JG, Schmitt MH, Mushlin AI, Mitchell PH, Eldredge DH, Oakes D, et al. Association between nurse-physician collaboration and patient outcomes in three intensive care units. Critical Care Medicine. 1999;27(9). 
  44. Messmer PR. Enhancing nurse-physician collaboration using pediatric simulation. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 2008;39(7):319-27. 
  45. Statistics Korea (KR). Population Prospects of the World and South Korea (based on the 2021 Population Projections). Daejeon, Korea: Statistics Korea (KR); 2022. 
  46. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2023 [cited 2024 Feb 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases. 
  47. Babur MN, Liaqat M. Interprofessional collaboration among rehabilitation professionals. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2017(6):908-13. 
  48. Pascucci D, Sassano M, Nurchis MC, Cicconi M, Acampora A, Park D, et al. Impact of interprofessional collaboration on chronic disease management: findings from a systematic review of clinical trial and meta-analysis. Health Policy. 2021;125(2):191-202. 
  49. McCabe C, Patel KD, Fletcher S, Winters N, Sheaf G, Varley J, et al. Online interprofessional education related to chronic illness for health professionals: a scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2021;35(3):444-53. 
  50. Liaw SY, Tan JZ, Bin Rusli KD, Ratan R, Zhou W, Lim S, et al. Artificial intelligence versus human-controlled doctor in virtual reality simulation for sepsis team training: randomized controlled study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2023;25:e47748. 
  51. Ignacio J, Dolmans D, Scherpbier A, Rethans JJ, Chan S, Liaw SY. Comparison of standardized patients with high-fidelity simulators for managing stress and improving performance in clinical deterioration: a mixed methods study. Nurse Education Today. 2015;35(12):1161-8. 
  52. Liaw SY, Tan KK, Wu LT, Tan SC, Choo H, Yap J, et al. Finding the right blend of technologically enhanced learning environments: randomized controlled study of the effect of instructional sequences on interprofessional learning. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019;21(5):e12537. 
  53. Aldriwesh MG, Alyousif SM, Alharbi NS. Undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. 2022;22(1):13. 
  54. Vuurberg G, Vos JAM, Christoph LH, de Vos R. The effectiveness of interprofessional classroom-based education in medical curricula: a systematic review. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice. 2019;15:157-67. 
  55. Howarth SD, Fielden SA, O'Hara JK. How do we educate medical students interprofessionally about patient safety? A scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2022;36(2):259-67. 
  56. MacMillan K, Reeves S. Editorial: interprofessional education and collaboration: the need for a socio-historical framing. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2014;28(2):89-91. 
  57. Herath C, Zhou Y, Gan Y, Nakandawire N, Gong Y, Lu Z. A comparative study of interprofessional education in global health care: a systematic review. Medicine. 2017;96(38):e7336. 
  58. Andrade C. The limitations of quasi-experimental studies, and methods for data analysis when a quasi-experimental research design is unavoidable. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2021;43(5):451-2. 
  59. Sullivan GM. Getting off the "gold standard": randomized controlled trials and education research. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2011;3(3):285-9. 
  60. Cooper S. Simulation versus lecture? Measuring educational impact: considerations for best practice. Evidence-Based Nursing. 2016;19(2):55.