DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Influencing Relationships of Transaction Risk and Purchase Value on Repurchase Intention for the Second-hand Products

거래위험과 구매가치가 중고제품 재구매 의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2024.04.22
  • Accepted : 2024.06.20
  • Published : 2024.06.30

Abstract

The current study investigated the factors influencing the buyer's repurchase intention for second-hand products. This study first identified perceived risk and purchase value as the two primary influencing variables. Additionally, some exogenous variables influencing these two variables were examined. Statistical analysis using Partial Least Squares (PLS) revealed that product uncertainty, seller uncertainty, and site trust had statistically significant relationships with perceived transaction risk. However, while economic benefit showed a significant impact on purchase value, product scarcity and resale value did not exhibit a significant relationship with purchase value. Perceived transaction risk was found to have an insignificant relationship with repurchase intention, but indirectly influenced repurchase intention through purchase value. Purchase value was identified as having a significant influence on repurchase intention. Therefore, it was concluded that purchase value is the most important factor influencing repurchase intention in the purchase of second-hand products, while transaction risk indirectly influences repurchase intention through purchase value. The study indicates that product uncertainty and economic benefit are the most significant exogenous factors influencing transaction risk and purchase value, respectively.

최근 당근마켓, 번개장터 등을 비롯한 온라인 중고제품 사이트에서의 거래가 활발히 진행되고 이용자 수도 큰 증가를 보이고 있다. 본 연구는 중고제품 거래 사이트를 통한 중고제품의 거래에 있어서 최종 구매자의 재구매 의도에 영향을 주는 영향요인을 조사하고자 하였다. 우선 온라인 거래가 가지는 위험과 함께 중고거래의 구매가치를 두 가지 주요 변수로 설정하였으며, 또한 이 두 가지 변수에 대한 외생변수들을 각각 고찰하였다. 중고제품 거래를 경험한 161명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, PLS(partial least squares)를 이용하여 설문조사 데이터를 분석하였다. 통계 분석 결과, 제품 불확실성, 판매자 불확실성, 그리고 사이트에 대한 신뢰가 모두 거래위험에 통계적으로 유의한 관계를 나타냄을 알 수 있었다. 구매가치에 대한 유의성을 살펴보면, 경제적 이익은 구매가치에 유의한 관계를 보였으나, 제품희소성, 재판매가치는 구매가치에 유의한 관계를 보이지 않았다. 지각된 거래위험은 구매가치에 제한적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 지각된 거래위험은 재구매 의도에 직접적으로는 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났으나, 구매가치를 통하여 재구매 의도에 간접효과를 가지는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 구매가치는 재구매 의도에 매우 강한 영향을 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 중고제품 구매에 있어서 구매의도에 대한 가장 큰 영향요인은 구매가치이며, 지각된 거래위험은 재구매 의도에 직접적으로 영향을 주지 못하고 구매가치를 통하여 간접적으로 영향을 미치는 것을 알 수 있었다. 거래위험과 구매가치에 제품 불확실성과 경제적 이익이 각각 가장 큰 외생 영향요인으로 나타나, 본 연구는 구매자들에게 판매 중고제품에 대한 구체적인 정보를 제공하고, 제품 품질을 고려하여 적절하게 제품 가격을 설정하는 것이 중고제품 시장에서 소비자를 재구매로 이끄는 중요한 요인이라는 시사점을 제공하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽기영, 지소영 (2008). 인터넷 구매결정과정에서의 관여도의 조절효과에 관한 연구. 경영정보학연구, 18(2), 15-40.
  2. 권순만, 김난도 (1995). 행정의 조직경제학적 접근: 대리인 이론의 행정학적 함의를 중심으로. 한국행정학보, 29(1), 77-95.
  3. 김종욱, 박상철, 이원준 (2005). 온라인 소비자 구매행동에서 제품관여도의 조절효과에 관한 연구. 경영과학, 22(2), 51-76.
  4. 박고은, 천혜정 (2020). "당근하세요?": 모바일 플랫폼을 이용한 소비자간 중고품 거래 경험의 의미. 소비자문제연구, 51(3), 81-108. https://doi.org/10.15723/JCPS.51.3.202012.81
  5. 박유진, 이보성, 김범수, 이애리 (2017). 온라인 중고물품 재구매의 도 영향요인 분석: "중고나라" 사이트를 중심으로. e-비즈니스연구, 18(1), 123-140.
  6. 송유진 (2020). 휴리스틱-체계적 정보처리 단서가 온라인 중고거래에서의 지각된 위험과 거래의도에 미치는 영향. 소비자문제연구, 15(1), 51-77.
  7. 여영성, 이세진 (2023). 온라인 중고거래에서 구매여정 단계별 지각된 위험에 영향을 미치는 요인. 광고PR실학연구, 16(4), 95-119. https://doi.org/10.21331/JPRAPR.2023.16.4.004
  8. 이상윤, 이동주, 김명수, 이동후, 안재현 (2007). e-마켓플레이스 에서의 인지된 위험의 원천과 완화요인. Information Systems Review, 9(2), 41-66.
  9. 이승창 (2009). 온라인 중고차 거래에서 품질위험을 높게 지각한 구매자의 신뢰형성: 구매자와 대리인 양자간 신뢰. 유통과학연구, 7(3), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.15722/JDS.7.3.200909.49
  10. 이호근, 이승창, 강훈철 (2003). 인터넷 경매의 신뢰형성요인과 경매참여의도에 관한 연구. 경영학연구, 32(1), 149-180.
  11. 이호근, 이승창, 성대원 (2003). 품질위험 지각 정도에 따른 인터넷 중고차 사이트의 신뢰형성 요인과 구매의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 경영정보학연구, 13(2), 119-143.
  12. 인터넷진흥원 (2021). 전자거래 분쟁조정 사례집.
  13. 장시영 이정섭 (2000). 전자상거래와 전통적 상거래에서 고객이 지각한 가치 비교. 경영정보학연구, 10(3), 159-180.
  14. 최도영, 이건창 (2016). 의사결정 프로세스를 고려한 불확실성의 인지적 차이에 대한 실증 연구. 경영학연구, 45(3), 829-847.
  15. Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1998). Business marketing: Understand what customers value. Harvard Business Review, 76, 5-15.
  16. Austin, R. D. (2001). The effect of time pressure on quality in software development: An agency model. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.2.195.9699
  17. Bapna, R., Chang, S. A., Goes, P., & Gupta, A. (2009). Overlapping online auctions: Empirical characterization of bidder strategies and auction prices. MIS Quarterly, 33(4), 763-783. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650326
  18. Bennett, P., & Harrell, G. (1975). The role of confidence in understanding and predicting buyers' attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(2), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1086/208622
  19. Broekhuizen, T. L. J., & Jager, W. (2003). A conceptual model of channel choice: Measuring online and offline shopping value perceptions. Working Paper, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  20. Bui, S., & Kettinger, W. (2013). Adverse selection in online new-goods market: An analysis of product uncertainty and seller uncertainty. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois.
  21. Calvo-Porral, C., Orosa-Gonzalez, J., & Viejo-Fernandez, N. (2023). Barriers to online second-hand purchase behavior. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 42(2), 213-233.
  22. Chen, J., Zhang, C., & Xu, Y. (2014). The Role of mutual trust in building members' loyalty to a c2c platform provider. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14(1), 147-171. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415140105
  23. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.
  24. Dimoka, A., Hong, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2012). On product uncertainty in online markets: Theory and evidence. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 395-426.
  25. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
  26. Edbring, E. G., Lehner, M., & Mont, O. (2016). Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: Motivations and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.107
  27. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
  28. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  29. Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2017). The influence of perceived value on purchase intention in social commerce context. Internet Research, 27(4), 772-785. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2016-0164
  30. Gefen D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
  31. Gierl, H., Plantsch, M., & Schweidler, J. (2008). Scarcity effects on sales volume in retail. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18, 5-61.
  32. Gronroos, C., & Ravald, A. (1994). The value concept and relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 30(2), 19-30.
  33. Guiot, D., & Roux, D. (2010). A second-hand shoppers' motivation scale: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for retailers. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 355-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2010.08.002
  34. Hamari, J., Sjoklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047-2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552
  35. Hong, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2014). Product fit uncertainty in online markets: Nature, effects, and antecedents. Information Systems Research, 25(2), 328-344. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0520
  36. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  37. Koay, K. Y., Cheah, C. W., & Lom, H. S. (2023). Does perceived risk influence the intention to purchase second-hand clothing? A multigroup analysis of SHC consumers versus non-SHC consumers. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32(4), 530-543.
  38. Lee, Z. W. Y., Chan, T. K. H., Balaji, M. S., & Chong, A. Y.L. (2018). Why people participate in the sharing economy: An empirical investigation of Uber. Internet Research, 28(3), 829-850.
  39. Liao, S., & Chu, H. (2013). Influence of consumer online resale awareness on purchase decisions: A mental accounting perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 47(10), 1576-1597. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2010-0665
  40. Lynn, M. (1989). Scarcity effects on desirability-mediated by assumed expensiveness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(2), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(89)90023-8
  41. Lynn, M. (1992). Scarcity's enhancement of desirability: The role of naive economic theories. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1301_6
  42. Mas-Collel, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press.
  43. Milgrom, P., & Robert, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. Prentice-Hall Inc.
  44. Moriuchi, E., & Takahashi, I. (2022). The role of perceived value, trust and engagement in the C2C online secondary marketplace. Journal of Business Research, 148, 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.029
  45. Ofori, H., Kang, J., & Yang, S. B. (2023). What makes people purchase used products online? Focusing on the roles of consumer value, platform attachment, and consumer engagement. Korean Management Review, 52(5), 1003-1043. https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2023.52.5.1003
  46. Padmavathy, C., Swapana, M., & Paul, J. (2019). Online Second-hand shopping motivation-conceptualization, scale development, and validation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer, 51, 19-31.
  47. Park, J., Lennon, S., & Stoel, L. (2005). On-line product presentation: Effects on mood, perceived risk and purchase intention. Psychology & Marketing, 22(9), 695-719. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20080
  48. Pavlou, P. A., & Dimoka, A. (2006). The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 393-414. 
  49. Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105-136.
  50. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schmann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routers to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1086/208954
  51. Prendergast, G. P., Tsang, A., & Chan, C. (2010). The interactive influence of country of origin of brand and product involvement on purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(2), 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011027277
  52. Roux, D., & Guiot, D. (2008). Measuring second-hand shopping motives, antecedents and consequences. Recherche et Applications En Marketing, 23(4), 63-91.
  53. Saam, N. J. (2007). Asymmetry in information versus asymmetry in power: Implicit assumptions of agency theory? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(6), 825-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.01.018
  54. Schibik, A., Strutton, D., & Thompson, K. (2022). What makes a product vintage? investigating relationships between consumer pastness, scarcity and purchase intentions toward vintage products. European Journal of Marketing, 56(7), 1830-1855. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2021-0140
  55. Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). The psychology of ego-involvement, social attitudes and identification. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  56. Shulman, J. D., Cunha Jr., M., & Clair J. (2015). Consumer uncertainty and purchase decision reversals: Theory and evidence. Marketing Science, 34(4), 590-605. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2015.0906
  57. Stewart, K. (1999). Transference as a means of building trust in world wide web sites. In International Conference on Information Systems 1999 Proceedings, Munich, Germany, 458-464.
  58. Styven, M. E., & Mariani, M. M. (2020). Understanding the intention to buy secondhand clothing on sharing economy platforms: The influence of sustainability, distance from the consumption system, and economic motivations. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 724-739. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21334
  59. Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 77-105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80005-0
  60. Turunen, L., & Leipamaa-Leskinen, H. (2015). Pre-loved luxury: Identifying the meanings of second-hand luxury possessions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-05-2014-0603
  61. Turunen, L., & Poyry, E. (2019). Shopping with the resale value in mind: A study on second-hand luxury consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(6), 549-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12539
  62. Venkatraman, M. P. (1989). Involvement and risk. Psychology & Marketing, 6(3), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220060306
  63. Verhallen, T. (1982). Scarcity and consumer behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2, 299-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(82)90034-4
  64. Vijayasarathy, L. R., & Jones, J. M. (2000). Print and internet catalog shopping: Assessing attitudes and intentions. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10(3), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240010331948
  65. Williams, C. C., & Paddock, C. (2003). The meaning of alternative consumption practices. Cities, 20(5), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(03)00048-9
  66. Wu, W. Y., Lu, H. Y., Wu, Y. Y., & Fu, C. S. (2012). The effects of product scarcity and consumers' need for uniqueness on purchase intention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(3), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01000.x
  67. Wua, Y., Xina, L., Lib, D., Yuc, J., & Guo, J. (2021). How does scarcity promotion lead to impulse purchase in the online market? a field experiment. Information & Management, 58(1), 2-10.
  68. Yan, R.-N., Bae, S. Y., & Xu, H. (2015). Second-hand clothing shopping among college students: The role of psychographic characteristics. Young Consumers, 16(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-02-2014-00429
  69. Yoh, E., Damhorst, M. L., Sapp, S., & Lazniak, R. (2003). Consumer adoption of the internet: The case of apparel shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 20(12), 1095-1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10110
  70. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1086/208520
  71. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
  72. 오진주 (2024, 2월 4일). 고물가에 중고거래 시장 급성장. 대한경제, https://m.dnews.co.kr/m_home/view.jsp?idxno=202402041401031630530
  73. 번개장터 (2024, 2월 14일). 롤스로이스 레이스 6.6 V12 블랙 배지 480,000,000원. https://m.bunjang.co.kr/products/230505579?q=롤스로이스&ref=검색결과
  74. 이혜리 (2023, 10월 14일). "사고 파는 재미있잖아요"...중고거래에 빠진 MZ세대. 이코노미스트, https://economist.co.kr/article/view/ecn202310130018
  75. 박한신 (2022, 6월 23일). 판 커진 중고차 시장..."수년 내60조원 신차 넘을 것". 한국경제, https://www.hankyung.com/article/2022062321771
  76. 이현주 (2023, 8월 19일). 당근마켓서 집 구하겠다는 딸..."속터져요" 하소연. 한국경제, https://www.hankyung.com/article/2023081804446
  77. Boston Consulting Group. (2022). What an accelerating secondhand market means for fashion brands and retailers. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/the-impact-of-secondhand-market-on-fashion-retailers
  78. IndustryMarket. (2023). 중고거래 시장, 30조원 넘어서. Retrieved from https://industrymarket.co.kr/junggogeorae-sijang-30joweon-neomeoseo/?lastPage=home