DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Uncovering the Role of External APIs in Driving Dynamic Ecosystem Growth

  • Um, Sungyong (School of Business Administration, Hanyang University(ERICA)) ;
  • Kang, Martin (Information Systems and Business Analytics, Loyola Marymount University) ;
  • Son, Insoo (Department of Global Business Administration, Sangmyung University)
  • Received : 2024.05.16
  • Accepted : 2024.06.23
  • Published : 2024.06.30

Abstract

Purpose This study highlights the crucial role of external APIs in driving dynamic evolution within a digital ecosystem. Drawing on the concept of evolutionary network biology perspective, this study hypothesizes that APIs' (non)network properties can significantly impact a digital ecosystem's product variety. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes plug-in source code data from WordPress.org between January 2004 and December 2014, using survival analysis to test this hypothesis. Findings The empirical results demonstrate that external APIs have a more significant impact on promoting ecosystem evolution over time than those offered by a focal platform system. This research enhances our understanding of ecosystem dynamics and emphasizes the critical role of the generative nature of APIs in fostering ecosystem growth.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2023-3072).

References

  1. Bakken, T. E., Jorstad, N. L., Hu, Q., Lake, B. B., Tian, W., Kalmbach, B. E., Crow, M., Hodge, R. D., Krienen, F. M., and Sorensen, S. A., "Comparative Cellular Analysis of Motor Cortex in Human, Marmoset and Mouse," Nature, Vol. 598, No. 7879, 2021, pp. 111-119.
  2. Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., and Von Hippel, E., "How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study," Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1291-1313.
  3. Baldwin, C. Y., and Clark, K. B., Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
  4. Boudreau, K. J., "Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software App Developers and Patterns of Innovation," Organization Science, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2021, pp. 1409-1427.
  5. Boudreau, K. J., and Lakhani, K. R., ""Open" Disclosure of Innovations, Incentives and Follow-on Reuse: Theory on Processes of Cumulative Innovation and a Field Experiment in Computational Biology," Research Policy, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2015, pp. 4-19.
  6. Burford, N., Shipilov, A. V., and Furr, N., "How Ecosystem Structure Affects Firm Performance in Response to a Negative Shock to Interdependencies," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2021, pp. 30-57.
  7. Cenamor, J., and Frishammar, J., "Openness in Platform Ecosystems: Innovation Strategies for Complementary Products," Research Policy, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2021, pp. 104148.
  8. Ethiraj, S. K., and Levinthal, D., "Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems," Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2004, pp. 159-173.
  9. Fortuna, M. A., Bonachela, J. A., and Levin, S. A., "Evolution of a Modular Software Network," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108, No. 50, 2011, pp. 19985-19989.
  10. Ganco, M., Kapoor, R., and Lee, G. K., "From Rugged Landscapes to Rugged Ecosystems: Structure of Interdependencies and Firms' Innovative Search," Academy of Management Review, 2020, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 646-674.
  11. Gawer, A., and Cusumano, M. A., "Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2014, pp. 417-433.
  12. Haefliger, S., Von Krogh, G., and Spaeth, S., "Code Reuse in Open Source Software," Management Science, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2008, pp. 180-193.
  13. Hawrylycz, M. J., Lein, E. S., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Shen, E. H., Ng, L., Miller, J. A., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Smith, K. A., Ebbert, A., and Riley, Z. L., "An Anatomically Comprehensive Atlas of the Adult Human Brain Transcriptome," Nature, 2012, Vol. 489, No. 7416, pp. 391-399.
  14. Henfridsson, O., Nandhakumar, J., Scarbrough, H., and Panourgias, N, "Recombination in the Open-Ended Value Landscape of Digital Innovation," Information and Organization, 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 89-100.
  15. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., and Gawer, A., "Towards a Theory of Ecosystems," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2018, pp. 2255-2276.
  16. Kang, H. G., Kang, C.-M., and Jeon, S. M., "An Innovative Framework to Classify Online Platforms," The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2022, pp. 59-90.
  17. Kauffman, S. A., The Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution, Oxford University Press, USA, 1993.
  18. Kitano, H., "Computational Systems Biology," Nature, Vol. 420, No. 6912, 2002, pp. 206-210.
  19. Labonte, B., Engmann, O., Purushothaman, I., Menard, C., Wang, J., Tan, C., Scarpa, J. R., Moy, G., Loh, Y.-H. E., and Cahill, M., "Sex-Specific Transcriptional Signatures in Human Depression," Nature Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2017, pp. 1102-1111.
  20. Langfelder, P., Zhang, B., and Horvath, S., "Defining Clusters from a Hierarchical Cluster Tree: The Dynamic Tree Cut Package for R," Bioinformatics, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2008, pp. 719-720.
  21. Lee, S., "When in Danger, Who will help you? Two Types of Trust in Technical Coping on Online Platforms," The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2023, pp. 69-94.
  22. Levinthal, D. A., and Marino, A., "Three Facets of Organizational Adaptation: Selection, Variety, and Plasticity," Organization Science, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2015, pp. 743-755.
  23. Lynch, M., Koskella, B., and Schaack, S, "Mutation Pressure and the Evolution of Organelle Genomic Architecture," Science, Vol. 311, No. 5768, 2006, pp. 1727-1730.
  24. Newman, M. E., "Communities, Modules and Large-scale Structure in Networks," Nature Physics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2012, pp. 25-31.
  25. Ondrus, J., Gannamaneni, A., and Lyytinen, K., "The Impact of Openness on the Market Potential of Multi-sided Platforms: A Case Study of Mobile Payment Platforms," Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2015, pp. 260-275.
  26. Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., and Jiang, X., "Platform Ecosystems: How Developers lnvert the Firm," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2017, pp. 255-266.
  27. Parker, G. G., and Van Alstyne, M. W., "Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design," Management Science, Vol. 51, No. 10, 2005, pp. 1494-1504.
  28. Rajarajan, P., Borrman, T., Liao, W., Schrode, N., Flaherty, E., Casino, C., Powell, S., Yashaswini, C., LaMarca, E. A., and Kassim, B., "Neuron-Specific Signatures in the Chromosomal Connectome Associated with Schizophrenia Risk," Science, Vol. 362, No. 6420, 2018, eaat4311.
  29. Ravasz, E., Somera, A. L., Mongru, D. A., Oltvai, Z. N., and Barabasi, A. L., "Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks," Science, Vol. 297, No. 5586, 2002, pp. 1551-1555.
  30. Segal, M. R., "Regression Trees for Censored Data," Biometrics, Vol. 44, No. 1, 1988, pp. 35-47.
  31. Strogatz, S. H., "Exploring Complex Networks," Nature, Vol. 410, No. 6825, 2001, pp. 268-276.
  32. Tiwana, A., "Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems," Information Systems Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2015, pp. 266-281.
  33. Tiwana, A., "Platform Synergy: Architectural Origins and Competitive Consequences," Information Systems Research, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2018, pp. 829-848.
  34. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., and Bush, A. A., "Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics," Information Systems Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2010, pp. 675-687.
  35. Um, S., Zhang, B., Wattal, S., and Yoo, Y., "Software Components and Product Variety in a Platform Ecosystem: A Dynamic Network Analysis of WordPress," Information Systems Research, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2023, pp. 1339-1374.
  36. Wagner, G. P., and Altenberg, L., "Perspective: Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability," Evolution, Vol. 50, No. 3, 1996, pp. 967-976.
  37. Xue, L., Song, P., Rai, A., Zhang, C., and Zhao, X., "Implications of Application Programming Interfaces for Third-party New App Development and Copycatting," Production and Operations Management, Vol. 28, No. 8, 2019, pp. 1887-1902.
  38. Yip, A. M., and Horvath, S., "Gene Network Interconnectedness and the Generalized Topological Overlap Measure," BMC bioinformatics, Vol. 8, No. 22, 2007, pp. 1-14.
  39. Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., and Majchrzak, A., "Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World," Organization Science, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2012, 1398-1408.
  40. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., and Lyytinen, K., "Research Commentary---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2010, pp. 724-735.
  41. Zhang, B., and Horvath, S., "A General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2005, pp. 1-45.
  42. Zittrain, J. L., "The Generative Internet," Harvard Law Review, Vol. 119, No. 7, 2006, pp. 1974-2040.