Journal of Daesoon Thought and the Religions of East Asia (대순사상과 동아시아종교)

DAOS(The Daesoon Academy of Sciences) (대진대학교 대순사상학술원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Ethical Obligations of Humankind towards Animals and Its Implications for Korean Religions: Focusing on Korean Buddhism and Daesoon Thought

  • Dominik RUTANA (SWPS University)
  • Received : 2024.01.05
  • Accepted : 2024.03.20
  • Published : 2024.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study presents and examines various ethical theories that could offer potential solutions to the issue of discrimination against non-human animals in contemporary society, and traces its implications for Korean religions. The article focuses on two normative ethical theories - virtue ethics and the ethics of care - and through an analysis of existing research, argues that both theories may serve as foundational principles guiding our behavior, not only in our interactions with other humans but also in our treatment of non-human animals. Furthermore, the examples presented in this study demonstrate that similar ethical theories have already been adopted as frameworks for human behavior towards other living beings within two religious traditions, Buddhism and Daesoon Jinrihoe. In both belief systems, animals are acknowledged as integral components of the world in which we live. Additionally, both religions endorse the idea that the well-being of non-human animals and our attitudes toward them can also have a direct impact on our present lives, as well as on our future existence. Consequently, promoting morally upright conduct towards other living creatures should be viewed as a necessary measure, beneficial not only for the animals themselves but also for the collective well-being of humanity.

Keywords

References

  1. Animal Ethics 2023 "Virtue Ethics and Care Ethics." Animal Ethics, accssed on 3 August 2023. https://www.animal-ethics.org/virtue-ethics-care-ethics/.
  2. Cha, Seon-keun 2020 "An Introduction to the Study of the Ecological Theory of Daesoon Jinrihoe: Sangsaeng Ecological Theory." The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences 35 295-330. https://doi.org/10.25050/jdaos.2020.35.0.295
  3. Demiéville, Paul 1965 "Momies d'Extrême-Orient." Journal des Savants: 144-170.
  4. Daesoon Institute for Religion and Culture (DIRC) 2020 The Canonical Scripture. Yeoju: Daesoon Jinrihoe Press.http://dict.dirc.kr/app/e/1/page
  5. Dimmock, Mark and Andrew Fisher 2017 Ethics for a-Levell: For AQA Philosophy and OCR Religious Studies. Open Book Publishing. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1wc7r6j
  6. Duignan, Brian 2013 "Speciesism." Encyclopedia Britannica, accssed on 26 January 2024. https://www.britannica.com/topic/speciesism
  7. Engster, Daniel 2006 "Care Ethics and Animal Welfare." Journal of social philosophy 37(4): 521-536. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00355.x
  8. Finnigan, Bronwyn 2017 "Buddhism and Animal Ethics." Philosophy Compass 12(7): e12424. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12424
  9. Frooding, Barbro and Martin Peterson 2011 "Animal Ethics Based on Friendship." Journal of Animal Ethics 1(1): 58-69. https://doi.org/10.5406/janimalethics.1.1.0058
  10. Hursthouse Rosalind and Glen Pettigrove 2018 "Virtue Ethics." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue/
  11. Hyundeok Temple Site 2024 "History of Hyundeok Temple." accssed on 28 January 2024. http://www.hyundeoksa.or.kr/html/dzDocument/0000100002.html.
  12. Joo, So-yeon and Nam-sik Ko 2023 "A Study on Moral Systems of Aristotle and Kang Jeungsan: Focusing on the Nature of Virtue and Teleological Characteristics." The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences 46: 189-234. https://doi.org/10.25050/jdaos.2023.46.0.189
  13. Jung, Kiok 2020 "Right Understanding on 'Releasing Living Creatures' in Buddhism." Won-Buddhist Thought and Religious Culture 86: 147-175.
  14. Kim, Jin-young and Youngjun Lee 2021 "Animal Welfare from the Perspective of the Grievance-Resolution of Animals." The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences 37 229-262. https://doi.org/10.25050/jdaos.2021.37.0.229
  15. Kim, Seok-Eun 2020 "A Study on the Effects of Companion Animals on Humans: Based on the Tale of a Righteous Dog in Hongseong)." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 20(12): 659-670. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.12.659
  16. Lee, Gyung-won 1998 "The Meaning of Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence and Reordering Work of Heaven and Earth." The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Science 4:541-568. https://doi.org/10.25050/jdaos.1998.4.0.15
  17. Lim, Sang-mok and Suk-hwan Lee 2021 "The Modern Significance of Releasing Captive Animals: Mainly Focused on Hanmaum Thought." Dongseocheolhagyeongu 100: 177-203. https://doi.org/10.15841/kspew..100.202106.177
  18. Regan, Tom 1985 The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  19. Shiu, Henry and Leah Stokes 2008 "Buddhist Animal Release Practices: Historic, Environmental, Public Health and Economic Concerns." Contemporary Buddhism 9(2): 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639940802556529
  20. Singer, Peter 1975 Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York, NY: Random House.
  21. Slote, Michael 2013 "On Virtue Ethics." Frontiers of Philosophy in China 8(1): 22-30. https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-002-013-0003-6
  22. Veldkamp, Elmer 2008 "Commemoration of Dead Animals in Contemporary Korea: Emergence and Development of Dongmul Wiryeongje as Modern Folklore." The Review of Korean Studies 11(3): 149-169. https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2008.11.3.007
  23. Wrage, Birte 2022 "Caring Animals and Care Ethics." Biology & Philosophy 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-022-09857-y
  24. Zimmermann, Michael 2002 A Buddha Within: The Tathāgatagarbhasutra; the Earliest Exposition of the Buddha-Nature Teaching in India. Tokyo: The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology, Soka University.