The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surface treatment, liquid, and aging effects on color and surface properties of monolithic ceramics

  • Sertac Sariyer (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University) ;
  • Meryem Gulce Subasi (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University)
  • Received : 2023.12.02
  • Accepted : 2024.06.09
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of surface treatments, liquids, and aging on color, translucency, and surface properties of monolithic ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Lithium disilicate (LDS) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramics (n = 135 each) were cut and divided into three groups [crystallization+glaze (single stage), crystallization-glaze (two stages), and crystallization-polish (two stages)]. One sample from each group was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Remaining samples were divided into four subgroups (distilled water, coffee, grape juice, and smoothie) (n = 11 each), stored for 12 d in the respective liquids, and thermally aged. One sample from each subgroup was analyzed using SEM. The color, gloss, and roughness values of the samples were analyzed after surface treatment (initial) and storage under different liquids+aging conditions. The initial data and both the aged data and data change values were analyzed using robust two- and three-way analyses of variance. RESULTS. The glazed groups exhibited smoother surfaces. Ceramic type and ceramic-surface treatment interactions affected the initial translucency parameter (TP) (P < .001) and the initial and aged roughness values (P ≤ .001). Surface treatment type affected the color change (P < .001), and ceramic type affected the aged TP values (P < .001). Type of ceramic, surface treatment, and their interactions affected both the initial and aged gloss (P ≤ .001) and TP change values (P ≤ .015). Surface treatment type and ceramic-surface treatment interactions affected the gloss change values (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION. Although both ceramics and all surface treatments are clinically applicable, crystallization-glaze is recommended. When gloss and smoothness are important or when translucency is important, ZLS or LDS may be preferred, respectively.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Mehmet Akkas for performing the SEM analysis; Professors Aladdin Kacal, Sait Dundar Sofuoglu, and Rasim Ceylantekin for supplying the roughness, gloss, and spectrophotometer devices, respectively; and Eistatistik for performing the statistical analyses.

References

  1. de Paula VG, Bonfante G, Lorenzoni FC, Coelho PG, Bonjardim LR, Fardin VP, Bonfante EA. Lifetime prediction of veneered versus monolithic lithium disilicate crowns loaded on marginal ridges. Dent Mater 2019;35:511-22. 
  2. Garling A, Sasse M, Becker MEE, Kern M. Fifteen-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic. J Dent 2019;89:103178. 
  3. Muhlemann S, Stromeyer S, Ioannidis A, Attin T, Hammerle CH, Ozcan M. Change in color and gloss parameters of stained monolithic resin-ceramic CAD/CAM materials after simulated aging: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2021;34:79-87. 
  4. Nejatidanesh F, Savabi G, Amjadi M, Abbasi M, Savabi O. Five year clinical outcomes and survival of chairside CAD/CAM ceramic laminate veneers - a retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:462-7. 
  5. Bajraktarova-Valjakova E, Korunoska-Stevkovska V, Kapusevska B, Gigovski N, Bajraktarova-Misevska C, Grozdanov A. Contemporary dental ceramic materials, a review: chemical composition, physical and mechanical properties, indications for use. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018;6:1742-55. 
  6. Culp L, McLaren EA. Lithium disilicate: the restorative material of multiple options. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:716-20, 722, 724-5. 
  7. Tysowsky GW. The science behind lithium disilicate: a metal-free alternative. Dent Today 2009;28:112-3. 
  8. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:71-5. 
  9. Juntavee N, Uasuwan P. Influence of thermal tempering processes on color characteristics of different monolithic computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing ceramic materials. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11:e614-24. 
  10. Lee YK. Translucency of human teeth and dental restorative materials and its clinical relevance. J Biomed Opt 2015;20:045002. 
  11. Nejatidanesh F, Azadbakht K, Savabi O, Sharifi M, Shirani M. Effect of repeated firing on the translucency of CAD-CAM monolithic glass-ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:530.e1-6. 
  12. Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:22-30. 
  13. Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hammerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J 2012;31:377-83. 
  14. Dos Santos DM, da Silva EVF, Watanabe D, Bitencourt SB, Guiotti AM, Goiato MC. Effect of different acidic solutions on the optical behavior of lithium disilicate ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:430-6. 
  15. Kukiattrakoon B, Hengtrakool C, Kedjarune-Leggat U. Effect of acidic agents on surface roughness of dental ceramics. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2011;8:6-15. 
  16. Theocharidou A, Kontonasaki E, Koukousaki I, Koumpouli A, Betsani I, Koidis P. Effect of in vitro aging and acidic storage on color, translucency, and contrast ratio of monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2022;127:479-88. 
  17. DeLong R, Douglas WH. An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991;38:339-45. 
  18. Shirani M, Savabi O, Mosharraf R, Akhavankhaleghi M, Hebibkhodaei M, Isler S. Comparison of translucency and opalescence among different dental monolithic ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:446.e1-6. 
  19. Habib AW, Aboushelib MN, Habib NA. Effect of chemical aging on color stability and surface properties of stained all-ceramic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33:636-47. 
  20. Tango RN, Todorovic A, Stamenkovic D, Karasan DN, Sailer I, Paravina RD. Effect of staining and aging on translucency parameter of CAD-CAM materials. Acta Stomatol Croat 2021;55:2-9. 
  21. Aldosari LI, Alshadidi AA, Porwal A, Al Ahmari NM, Al Moaleem MM, Suhluli AM, Shariff M, Shami AO. Surface roughness and color measurements of glazed or polished hybrid, feldspathic, and zirconia CAD/CAM restorative materials after hot and cold coffee immersion. BMC Oral Health 2021;21:422. 
  22. Vichi A, Fabian Fonzar R, Goracci C, Carrabba M, Ferrari M. Effect of finishing and polishing on roughness and gloss of lithium disilicate and lithium silicate zirconia reinforced glass ceramic for CAD/CAM systems. Oper Dent 2018;43:90-100. 
  23. Brescansin FN, Prochnow C, Guilardi LF, Kleverlaan CJ, Bacchi A, Valandro LF, Pereira GKR. Effect of different surface treatments on optical, colorimetric, and surface characteristics of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33:1017-28. 
  24. Brodine BA, Korioth TV, Morrow B, Shafter MA, Hollis WC, Cagna DR. Surface roughness of milled lithium disilicate with and without reinforcement after finishing and polishing: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2021;30:245-51. 
  25. Alencar-Silva FJ, Barreto JO, Negreiros WA, Silva PGB, Pinto-Fiamengui LMS, Regis RR. Effect of beverage solutions and toothbrushing on the surface roughness, microhardness, and color stainability of a vitreous CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:711.e1-6. 
  26. Kilic Avsar M, Bolayir G, Saygin A, Ulucan MC. Investigation of colour and surface changes of ceramic CAD/CAM blocks with different surface treatments after immersion to different beverages. J Aust Ceram Soc 2022;58:901-11. 
  27. Alsilani RS, Sherif RM, Elkhodary NA. Evaluation of colour stability and surface roughness of three CAD/CAM materials (IPS e. max, Vita Enamic, and PEEK) after immersion in two beverage solutions: an in vitro study. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2022;8:439-49. 
  28. Al-Angari SS, Meaigel S, Almayouf N, Quwayhis S, Aldahash A, Al-Angari NS. The Effects of a coffee beverage and whitening systems on surface roughness and gloss of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass ceramics. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2021;19:22808000211058866. 
  29. Incesu E, Yanikoglu N. Evaluation of the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:100-9. 
  30. Steiner R, Beier US, Heiss-Kisielewsky I, Engelmeier R, Dumfahrt H, Dhima M. Adjusting dental ceramics: An in vitro evaluation of the ability of various ceramic polishing kits to mimic glazed dental ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:616-22. 
  31. Al-Thobity AM, Gad MM, Farooq I, Alshahrani AS, Al-Dulaijan YA. Acid effects on the physical properties of different CAD/CAM ceramic materials: An in vitro analysis. J Prosthodont 2021;30:135-41. 
  32. Tinastepe N, Malkondu O, Iscan I, Kazazoglu E. Effect of home and over the contour bleaching on stainability of CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33:303-13. 
  33. Seyidaliyeva A, Rues S, Evagorou Z, Hassel AJ, Rammelsberg P, Zenthofer A. Color stability of polymer-infiltrated-ceramics compared with lithium disilicate ceramics and composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:43-50. 
  34. Guler AU, Guler E, Yucel AC, Ertas E. Effects of polishing procedures on color stability of composite resins. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:108-12. 
  35. Dawood L, Abo El-Farag S. Influence of staining beverages and surface finishing on color stability and surface roughness of all-ceramic restorations: Laboratory study. Egypt Dent J 2021;67:2413-22. 
  36. Pirvulescu IL, Pop D, Moaca E-A, Mihali C-V, Ille C, Jivanescu A. Effects of simulated gastric acid exposure on surface topography, mechanical and optical features of commercial CAD/CAM ceramic blocks. Appl Sci 2021;11:8703. 
  37. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, Sakai M, Takahashi H, Tashkandi E, Perez Mdel M. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27 Suppl 1:S1-9. 
  38. Belli R, Wendler M, de Ligny D, Cicconi MR, Petschelt A, Peterlik H, Lohbauer U. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization. Dent Mater 2017;33:84-98. 
  39. Ilie N, Hickel R. Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. Dent Mater 2008;24:908-14. 
  40. da Costa JB, Ferracane JL, Amaya-Pajares S, Pfefferkorn F. Visually acceptable gloss threshold for resin composite and polishing systems. J Am Dent Assoc 2021;152:385-92. 
  41. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99. 
  42. ISO 2813. Paints and varnishes-Determination of gloss value at 20°, 60° and 85°. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2014. 
  43. Monaco C, Arena A, Scheda L, Di Fiore A, Zucchelli G. In vitro 2D and 3D roughness and spectrophotometric and gloss analyses of ceramic materials after polishing with different prophylactic pastes. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:787.e1-8.