International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Revisiting Politeness Expressions in English

  • Eunsuk Lee (Dept. of English Education, Daegu Univ.)
  • Received : 2024.03.13
  • Accepted : 2024.05.01
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper revisits politeness expressions in English, exploring their linguistic characteristics and the underlying social dynamics they reflect. Grounded in pragmatic theories, politeness is examined as a phenomenon shaped by societal norms, wherein language users navigate the delicate balance between efficiency and maintaining positive social interactions. Through an analysis of various linguistic devices such as modal auxiliary verbs, progressive and past tenses, depersonalization, and the use of hedges, the study elucidates how speakers endeavor to mitigate potential burdens on listeners and foster smoother communication. By understanding and employing these linguistic strategies, English learners can better navigate the nuances of politeness expressions in the English cultural context. This exploration underscores the pivotal role of politeness in interpersonal communication and highlights its significance in facilitating effective interaction among language users.

Keywords

References

  1. B. Fraser, "Perspectives on Politeness," Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 14, pp. 219-236, 1990.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N
  2. R. Lakoff, "The Logic of Politeness: Or Minding Your p's and q's," in Proc. 9th Reginal Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 292-305, 1973. 
  3. Y. Matsumoto, "Politeness and Conversational Universals: Observations from Japanese," Multilingua Vol. 8.2-3, pp. 207-221, 1989.  https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.207
  4. P. Brown and S. Levinson, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge University Press, 1987. 
  5. G. Leech, "Language, Culture, and Politeness," in Proc. 1st International Conference of Humanities at Pusan National University, 2001. 
  6. A. Wierzbicka, "Different Culture, Different Language, Different Speech Acts," Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 9, pp. 149-161, 1985.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90023-2
  7. R. Scollon and S. Scollon, Intercultural Communication, Blackwell, 1999. 
  8. R. Arundale, "Re-analyzing Grice's Maxims and Cooperative Principle from a Conversational Perspective," in Proc. the meeting of the International Communication Association, 1997. 
  9. H. Spencer-Oatey, "Reconsidering Power and Distance," Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 26, pp. 1-24, 1996.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00047-X
  10. A. Tyler, "Conflicts in Perception, Negotiation, and Enactment of Participant Role and Status," Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 17, pp. 129-152, 1995.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014133
  11. H. Arndt and R. Janney, "Politeness Revisited: Cross-Modal Support Strategies," International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Vol. 23.4, pp. 281-300, 1985.  https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1985.23.1-4.281
  12. R. Watts, "Relevance and Relational Work: Linguistic Politeness as Politic Behavior," Multilingua, Vol. 8.2-3, pp. 131-166, 1989.  https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.131
  13. G. Kasper, "Linguistic Politeness: Current Research Issue," Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 14, pp. 193-218, 1990.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90080-W
  14. R. Cowan, Teacher's Grammar of English, Cambridge University Press, 2008. 
  15. R. Huddleston and G. K. Pullum, Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Cambridge University Press, 2002. 
  16. F. Palmer, Modality and the English Modals, Longman, 1979.