References
- van Rossum HH, Bietenbeck A, Cervinski MA, Katayev A, Loh TP, Badrick TC. Benefits, limitations, and controversies on patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) and the evidence behind the practice. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021;59:1213-1220. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0072
- Lindberg DA. Collection, evaluation, and transmission of hospital laboratory data. Methods Inf Med. 1967;6:97-107. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1636364
- Cembrowski GS. Use of patient data for quality control. Clin Lab Med. 1986;6:715-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-2712(18)30780-7
- Bull BS, Elashoff RM, Heilbron DC, Couperus J. A study of various estimators for the derivation of quality control procedures from patient erythrocyte indices. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974;61:473-481. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/61.4.473
- Hoffmann RG, Waid ME. The "average of normals" method of quality control. Am J Clin Pathol. 1965;43:134-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/43.2.134
- Cembrowski GS, Chandler EP, Westgard JO. Assessment of "average of normals" quality control procedures and guidelines for implementation. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984;81:492-499. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/81.4.492
- Smith FA, Kroft SH. Exponentially adjusted moving mean procedure for quality control. An optimized patient sample control procedure. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;105:44-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/105.1.44
- Neubauer AS. The EWMA control chart: properties and comparison with other quality-control procedures by computer simulation. Clin Chem. 1997;43:594-601. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/43.4.594
- Linnet K. The exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) rule compared with traditionally used quality control rules. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44:396-399. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2006.077
- Bietenbeck A, Thaler MA, Luppa PB, Klawonn F. Stronger together: aggregated Z-values of traditional quality control measurements and patient medians improve detection of biases. Clin Chem. 2017;63:1377-1387. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.269845
- Jones GR. Average of delta: a new quality control tool for clinical laboratories. Ann Clin Biochem. 2016;53(Pt 1):133-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215581400
- Liu J, Tan CH, Badrick T, Loh TP. Moving sum of number of positive patient result as a quality control tool. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55:1709-1714. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0950
- Liu J, Tan CH, Badrick T, Loh TP. Moving standard deviation and moving sum of outliers as quality tools for monitoring analytical precision. Clin Biochem. 2018;52:112-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.10.009
- van Rossum HH. Moving average quality control: principles, practical application and future perspectives. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57:773-782. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0795
- Katayev A, Fleming JK. Past, present, and future of laboratory quality control: patient-based real-time quality control or when getting more quality at less cost is not wishful thinking. J Lab Precis Med. 2020;5:28. https://doi.org/10.21037/jlpm-2019-qc-03
- Koerbin G, Liu J, Eigenstetter A, Tan CH, Badrick T, Loh TP. Missed detection of significant positive and negative shifts in gentamicin assay: implications for routine laboratory quality practices. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018;28:010705. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2018.010705
- Olivier J, Norberg MM. Positively skewed data: revisiting the Box-Cox power transformation. Int J Psychol Res. 2010;3:68-75. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.846
- Westgard JO, Bayat H, Westgard SA. Planning risk-based SQC schedules for bracketed operation of continuous production analyzers. Clin Chem. 2018;64:289-296. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.278291
- Rosenbaum MW, Flood JG, Melanson SEF, Baumann NA, Marzinke MA, Rai AJ, et al. Quality control practices for chemistry and immunochemistry in a cohort of 21 large academic medical centers. Am J Clin Pathol. 2018;150:96-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqy033
- Loh TP, Cervinski MA, Katayev A, Bietenbeck A, van Rossum H, Badrick T. Recommendations for laboratory informatics specifications needed for the application of patient-based real time quality control. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;495:625-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2019.06.009
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). C24: statistical quality control for quantitative measurement procedures: principles and definitions. 4th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: 2016.
- Liu J, Tan CH, Loh TP, Badrick T. Detecting long-term drift in reagent lots. Clin Chem. 2015;61:1292-1298. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.242511
- Liu J, Tan CH, Loh TP, Badrick T. Verification of out-of-control situations detected by "average of normal" approach. Clin Biochem. 2016;49:1248-1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.07.012
- Cooper G, DeJonge N, Ehrmeyer S, Yundt-Pacheco J, Jansen R, Ricos C, et al. Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2010 convocation of experts on laboratory quality. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:793-802. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.149
- Badrick T, Bietenbeck A, Cervinski MA, Katayev A, van Rossum HH, Loh TP. Patient-based real-time quality control: review and recommendations. Clin Chem. 2019;65:962-971. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2019.305482
- Parvin CA. Planning statistical quality control to minimize patient risk: it's about time. Clin Chem. 2018;64:249-250. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.282038
- Hayashi S, Ichihara K, Kanakura Y, Iwatani Y. A new quality control method based on a moving average of "latent reference values" selected from patients' daily test results. Rinsho Byori. 2004;52:204-211.
- Fleming JK, Katayev A. Changing the paradigm of laboratory quality control through implementation of real-time test results monitoring: for patients by patients. Clin Biochem. 2015;48:508-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.12.016
- Ng D, Polito FA, Cervinski MA. Optimization of a moving averages program using a simulated annealing algorithm: the goal is to monitor the process not the patients. Clin Chem. 2016;62:1361-1371. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.257055
- Rossum HHV, Kemperman H. Implementation and application of moving average as continuous analytical quality control instrument demonstrated for 24 routine chemistry assays. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55:1142-1151. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm2016-0696
- van Rossum HH, Kemperman H. Moving average for continuous quality control: time to move to implementation in daily practice? Clin Chem. 2017;63:1041-1043. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.269258
- Song C, Zhou J, Xia J, Ye D, Chen Q, Li W. Optimization and validation of patient-based real-time quality control procedure using moving average and average of normals with multi-rules for TT3, TT4, FT3, FT3, and TSH on three analyzers. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34:e23314. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23314
- Li Y, Yu Q, Zhang X, Chen X. Comparison and optimization of various moving patient-based real-time quality control procedures for serum sodium. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021;35:e23985. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23985
- Li T, Cao S, Wang Y, Xiong Y, He Y, Ke P, et al. Moving rate of positive patient results as a quality control tool for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assays. Ann Lab Med. 2021;41:51-59. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2021.41.1.51
- Liang Y, Wang Z, Huang D, Wang W, Feng X, Han Z, et al. A study on quality control using delta data with machine learning technique. Heliyon. 2022;8:e09935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09935
- Miller WG, Erek A, Cunningham TD, Oladipo O, Scott MG, Johnson RE. Commutability limitations influence quality control results with different reagent lots. Clin Chem. 2011;57:76-83. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2010.148106
- Thaler MA, Iakoubov R, Bietenbeck A, Luppa PB. Clinically relevant lot-to-lot reagent difference in a commercial immunoturbidimetric assay for glycated hemoglobin A1c. Clin Biochem. 2015;48:1167-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.07.018
- Loh TP, Bietenbeck A, Cervinski MA, van Rossum HH, Katayev A, Badrick T. Recommendation for performance verification of patient-based real-time quality control. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58:1205-1213. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1024
- Hong PD. A study on the analysis method of artificial intelligence for real-time data prediction. Proc Korean Inst Inf Commun Sci Conf. 2021;25:547-549. https://koreascience.kr/article/CFKO202121751034197.page
- Haeckel R, Wosniok W. Observed, unknown distributions of clinical chemical quantities should be considered to be log-normal: a proposal. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48:1393-1396. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.273
- van Rossum HH, Kemperman H. Optimization and validation of moving average quality control procedures using bias detection curves and moving average validation charts. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55:218-224. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0270
- van Rossum HH, Kemperman H. A method for optimization and validation of moving average as continuous analytical quality control instrument demonstrated for creatinine. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;457:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.03.008
- Ye JJ, Ingels SC, Parvin CA. Performance evaluation and planning for patient-based quality control procedures. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113:240-248. https://doi.org/10.1309/V5BT-BAWP-1WBF-14W6
- van Rossum HH, van den Broek D. Design and implementation of quality control plans that integrate moving average and internal quality control: incorporating the best of both worlds. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57:1329-1338. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0027
- Parvin CA. What's new in laboratory statistical quality control guidance? The 4th edition of CLSI C24, statistical quality control for quantitative measurement procedures: principles and definitions. J Appl Lab Med. 2017;1:581-584. https://doi.org/10.1373/jalm.2016.022269
- Poh DKH, Lim CY, Tan RZ, Markus C, Loh TP. Internal quality control: moving average algorithms outperform Westgard rules. Clin Biochem. 2021;98:63-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.09.007
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). EP23-A: laboratory quality control based on risk management; approved guideline. 2nd ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: 2011.