참고문헌
- Kim WJ, Cho YD, Ku Y, Ryoo HM. The worldwide patent landscape of dental implant technology. Biomater Res. 2022;26:59.
- Bharate V, Kumar Y, Koli D, Pruthi G, Jain V. Effect of different abutment materials (zirconia or titanium) on the crestal bone height in 1 year. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10:372-374.
- Kim NS, Lee MK, Hong MH. A Finite element stress analysis of abutment screw according to the implant abutment material. J Korean Acad Dent Technol. 2016;38:1-6.
- Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Mattiola A. Single-tooth implant reconstructions: esthetic factors influencing the decision between titanium and zirconia abutments in anterior regions. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2007;2:296-310.
- Schmalz G, Garhammer P. Biological interactions of dental cast alloys with oral tissues. Dent Mater. 2002;18:396-406.
- Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845-4869.
- Harinee A, Rajesh C, Anilkumar S, Raj I, Sandhya MR. Comparison of mechanical properties of the implant materials- titanium, zirconium and PEEK using three dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Adv Res. 2023;11:656-663.
- Gowda EM, Iyer SR, Verma K, Murali Mohan S. Evaluation of PEEK composite dental implants: a comparison of two different loading protocols. J Dent Res Rep. 2018;1:1-5.
- Bayata F, Yildiz C. The mechanical behaviors of various dental implant materials under fatigue. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2018:5047319.
- Eom TG, Suh S, Jeon GR, Shin JW, Jeong CM. Effect of tightening torque on abutment-fixture joint stability using 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2009;47:125-135.
- Choi SM, Choi H, Lee DH, Hong MH. Comparative finite element analysis of mandibular posterior single zirconia and titanium implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13:396-407.
- Chand YB, Mahendra J, Jigeesh N, Mahendra L, Shivasubramanian L, Perika SB. Comparison of stress distribution and deformation of four prosthetic materials in full-mouth rehabilitation with implants: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020;21:1210-1217.
- Hong MH. Effects of titanium and PEEK abutments on implant-supported dental prosthesis and stress distribution of surrounding bones: three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Tech Dent. 2022;44:67-75.
- Kohal RJ, Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Tripodakis A, Strub JR. Three-dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:189-194.
- Lin CP, Shyu YT, Wu YL, Tsai MH, Chen HS, Wu AY. Effects of marginal bone loss progression on stress distribution in different implant-abutment connections and abutment materials: a 3D finite element analysis study. Materials. 2022;15:5866.
- Butz F, Heydecke G, Okutan M, Strub JR. Survival rate, fracture strength and failure mode of ceramic implant abutments after chewing simulation. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:838-843.
- Denry IL, Holloway JA. Microstructural and crystallographic surface changes after grinding zirconia-based dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;76:440-448.
- Sundh A, Molin M, Sjogren G. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. Dent Mater. 2005;21:476-482.
- Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:519-526.
- Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:290-298.