The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business (산경연구논집)

Korea Distribution Science Association (한국유통과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effect of Patents, Technical White Papers, and Source Codes on the Financing Performance at Initial Coin Offerings

  • Youngkeun CHOI (Division of Business Administration, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Byoung-Goo KIM (Department of International Trade, Korea National Open University)
  • Received : 2024.06.20
  • Accepted : 2024.07.25
  • Published : 2024.07.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this research was to investigate how blockchain ventures can optimize their wealth through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). Drawing upon signal theory, this study examined the impact of technological capabilities on the performance of ICOs in blockchain ventures. Given the highly technical nature of companies involved in ICOs, the technical proficiency of venture companies can have a significant influence on the success of ICOs. Specifically, three potential indicators of technological capability - patents, white papers, and source code - were analyzed. Research design, data and methodology: To accomplish this, a database was constructed by coding the relevant variables from various sources for 514 companies that launched ICOs. This study conducted hierarchical regression analysis for the hypotheses test. Results: The results indicated that a blockchain venture with a patent had a positive effect on the performance of the ICO. Additionally, publishing source code had a positive impact on ICO performance. Conclusions: This study identifies crucial factors for ICO success, emphasizing the importance of technological capabilities. Companies should enhance these to boost investor confidence, transparency, and outcomes. This research offers valuable insights for businesses and policymakers in the evolving cryptocurrency market, aiming to maximize ICO performance and success.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5A2A01062179)

References

  1. Anglin, A. H., Short, J. C., Drover, W., Stevenson, R. M., McKenny, A. F., & Allison, T. H. (2018). The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 470-492.
  2. Bergh, D. D., Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Shannon, L. M. (2014). Signaling theory and equilibrium in strategic management research: An assessment and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 51(8), 1334-1360.
  3. Block, J., Colombo, M. G., Cumming, D. J., & Vismara, S. (2018). New players in entrepreneurial finance and why they are there. Small Business Economics, 50(2), 239-250.
  4. Busenitz, L. W., Fiet, J. O., & Moesel, D. (2005). Signaling in venture capitalists-new venture team funding decisions: Does it indicate long-term venture outcomes? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 1-12.
  5. Campino, J., Brochado, A., & Rosa, A. (2022). Initial coin offerings (ICOs): Why do they succeed? Financial Innovation, 8(1), 17-29.
  6. Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A. S., & Price, B. (2000). Regression analysis by example (3rd ed.). Wiley VCH.
  7. Chitsazan, H., Bagheri, A., & Tajeddin, M. (2022). Initial coin offerings (ICOs) success: Conceptualization, theories and systematic analysis of empirical studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121729.
  8. Cohney, S., Hoffman, D. A., Sklaroff, J., & Wishnick, D. A. (2018). Coin-operated capitalism. Working Paper.
  9. Colombo, M. G., Fisch, C., Momtaz, P. P., & Vismara, S. (2022). The CEO beauty premium: Founder CEO attractiveness and firm valuation in initial coin offerings. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 16(3), 491-521.
  10. Colombo, M. G., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2019). Signaling in science-based IPOs: The combined effect of affiliation with prestigious universities, underwriters, and venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 141-177.
  11. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67.
  12. Elitzur, R., & Gavious, A. (2003). Contracting, signaling, and moral hazard: A model of entrepreneurs, 'angels', and venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 709-725.
  13. Elnaj, S. (2018). The Bitcoin hype and the potential disruptive power of blockchain technology. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/02/06/the-bitcoin-hype-and-the-potential-disruptive-power-of-blockchain-technology. Last accessed: September 22nd, 2018.
  14. Fisch, C. (2019). Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 1-22.
  15. Fisch, C., Masiak, C., Vismara, S., & Block, J. (2021). Motives and profiles of ICO investors. Journal of Business Research, 125, 564-576.
  16. Felix, T. H., & von Eije, H. (2019). Underpricing in the cryptocurrency world: Evidence from initial coin offerings. Managerial Finance, 45(4), 563-578.
  17. Hoenen, S., Kolympiris, C., Schoenmakers, W., & Kalaitzandonakes, N. (2014). The diminishing signaling value of patents between early rounds of venture capital financing. Research Policy, 43(6), 956-989.
  18. Hsu, D. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2013). Resources as dual sources of advantage: Implications for valuing entrepreneurial-firm patents. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 761-781.
  19. Huang, W., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2020). The geography of initial coin offerings. Small Business Economics, 55(1), 77-102.
  20. Kaal, W. A., & Dell'Erba, M. (2018). Initial coin offerings: Emerging practices, risk factors, and red flags. In F. Moeslein & S. Omlor (Eds.), FinTech Handbook (forthcoming).
  21. Kastelein, R. (2017). What initial coin offerings are, and why VC firms care. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/03/what-initial-coin-offerings-are-and-why-vc-firms-care.
  22. Kotha, R., Crama, P., & Kim, P. H. (2018). Experience and signaling value in technology licensing contract payment structures. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1307-1342.
  23. Long, C. (2018). ICOs were 45% of IPOs in Q2 2018, as cryptos disrupt investment banks. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/caitlinlong/2018/07/22/icos-were-45-of-ipos-in-q2-2018-as-cryptos-disrupt-investment-banks.
  24. Momtaz, P. P. (2020). Initial coin offerings. PLOS ONE, 15(5), 1-30.
  25. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from https://www.coinpanion.org/whitepapers/BCH.pdf. Last accessed: September 22nd, 2018.
  26. Natarajan, H., Krause, S., & Gradstein, H. (2017). Distributed ledger technology (DLT) and blockchain. World Bank FinTech Note 1, Working Paper.
  27. Poutintsev, F. (2018). Why you should boycott ICOs that demand KYC? Retrieved from https://cryptocurrencyhub.io/why-you-should-boycott-icos-that-demand-kyc-29a5b43904fb. Last accessed: September 22nd, 2018.
  28. Reiff, N. (2018). What makes for a successful ICO? Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/tech/what-makes-successful-ico.
  29. Roose, K. (2017). Is there a cryptocurrency bubble? Just ask Doge. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/15/business/cryptocurrency-bubble-doge.html.
  30. Russo, C., & Kharif, O. (2017). The hottest ICOs are the ones that have done the least amount of work. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-12/want-to-issue-a-red-hot-ico-rule-no-1-is-do-very-little-work. Last accessed: September 22nd, 2018.
  31. Sameeh, T. (2018). ICO basics - security tokens vs. utility tokens. Retrieved from https://www.cointelligence.com/content/ico-basics-security-tokens-vs-utility-tokens.
  32. Schwartzkopff, D. (2018). ICO evaluation deep-dive: 13 questions to ask. Retrieved from https://medium.crypto20.com/ico-evaluation-deep-dive-13-questions-to-ask-77ee444c0b99.
  33. SEC. (2017). Investor bulletin: Initial coin offerings. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-and-bulletins/ib_coinofferings.
  34. Shifflett, S., & Jones, C. (2018). Buyer beware: Hundreds of Bitcoin wannabes show hallmarks of fraud. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/buyer-beware-hundreds-of-bitcoin-wannabes-show-hallmarks-of-fraud-1526573115.
  35. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
  36. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315-349.
  37. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O'Reilly.
  38. Yen, J. C., Wang, T., & Chen, Y. H. (2021). Different is better: How unique initial coin offering language in white papers enhances success. Accounting & Finance, 61(4), 5309-5340.