Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제49권2호
  • /
  • Pages.15.1-15.11
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Single-session associative protocol for dentin hypersensitivity management: a 1-year randomized, blinded clinical study

  • Thayna Carolina Zeni (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Western State University of Parana) ;
  • Poliana Maria de Faveri Cardoso (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Western State University of Parana) ;
  • Rafael da Silva Vanolli (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Western State University of Parana) ;
  • Marcio Jose Mendonca (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Western State University of Parana) ;
  • Julio Katuhide Ueda (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Western State University of Parana) ;
  • Veridiana Camilotti (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Western State University of Parana)
  • 투고 : 2023.09.25
  • 심사 : 2024.01.23
  • 발행 : 2024.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study aimed to establish a single-session associative protocol for nonrestorative management of dentin hypersensitivity (DH). Materials and Methods: Twenty-four individuals with DH and a minimum sensitivity level of 4 on the visual analog scale (VAS) were selected. The study was conducted in a split-mouth design, with each participant (n = 20) having at least 1 affected tooth in all quadrants. The management protocols consisted of control group: universal adhesive, Neural Desensitizing Protocol group: 5% potassium nitrate, Mixed Desensitizing Protocol (PAM) group: 5% sodium fluoride and 5% potassium nitrate, Remineralizing Desensitizing Protocol (PDR) group: surface-partially reacted glass technology photopolymerizable varnish. Evaluations were performed immediately after application, at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 12 months using the VAS sensitivity test. Results: The scores were subjected to statistical analysis using the Friedman test (p < 0.05), Durbin-Conover test (p < 0.05), and Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05). At the 12-month evaluation, all groups showed statistically significant differences compared to the initial assessment. For the evaluation after 12 months, there was a statistically significant difference between the PAM group, the control group, and the PDR group. Conclusions: It can be concluded that all groups were effective in controlling DH, but there were significant results in the control group and PDR group. The clinical relevance of this study is to demonstrate that the application of single-session desensitizing protocols can be effective in controlling DH for up to 12 months.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Favaro Zeola L, Soares PV, Cunha-Cruz J. Prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2019;81:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.015
  2. Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity new perspectives on an old problem. Int Dent J 2002;52:367-375. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595X.2002.tb00936.x
  3. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity. Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:221-226.
  4. Davari A, Ataei E, Assarzadeh H. Dentin hypersensitivity: etiology, diagnosis and treatment; a literature review. J Dent (Shiraz) 2013;14:136-145.
  5. Ishihata H, Finger WJ, Kanehira M, Shimauchi H, Komatsu M. In vitro dentin permeability after application of Gluma® desensitizer as aqueous solution or aqueous fumed silica dispersion. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:147-153. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000200011
  6. Garcia-Delaney C, Abad-Sanchez D, Arnabat-Dominguez J, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Gay-Escoda C. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the photobiomodulation in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity after basic therapy. A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9:e694-e702. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53635
  7. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:725-733. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0268
  8. Braennstroem M, Astroem A. A study on the mechanism of pain elicited from the dentin. J Dent Res 1964;43:619-625. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345640430041601
  9. Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Vitor GP, Silveira JO, Martins CC, Costa FO, Cota LO. Effect of dentin hypersensitivity treatment on oral health related quality of life - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2018;71:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.007
  10. Teixeira DNR, Zeola LF, Machado AC, Gomes RR, Souza PG, Mendes DC, et al. Relationship between noncarious cervical lesions, cervical dentin hypersensitivity, gingival recession, and associated risk factors: a cross-sectional study. J Dent 2018;76:93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.017
  11. Liu XX, Tenenbaum HC, Wilder RS, Quock R, Hewlett ER, Ren YF. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity: an evidence-based overview for dental practitioners. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:220.
  12. Shah D, Mital K. The role of trypsin:chymotrypsin in tissue repair. Adv Ther 2018;35:31-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0648-y
  13. Joshi S, Gowda AS, Joshi C. Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43:269-275. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2013.43.6.269
  14. Ma S, Imazato S, Chen JH, Mayanagi G, Takahashi N, Ishimoto T, et al. Effects of a coating resin containing S-PRG filler to prevent demineralization of root surfaces. Dent Mater J 2012;31:909-915. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-061
  15. Ravishankar P, Viswanath V, Archana D, Keerthi V, Dhanapal S, Lavanya Priya KP. The effect of three desensitizing agents on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized, split-mouth clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29:51-55. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_458_17
  16. Rabiabasree R, Krishnakumar R, Prabhu AS, Naik NS, Shashibhushan KK, Janarthanan K. Inhibitory effect of a resin coat-containing prereacted glass fillers on the enamel demineralization of the primary teeth: an in vitro pilot study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2019;37:146-150. https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_309_18
  17. Spinola MD, Moecke SE, Rossi NR, Nakatsuka T, Borges AB, Torres CRG. Efficacy of S-PRG filler containing varnishes on enamel demineralization prevention. Sci Rep 2020;10:18992.
  18. Suzuki M, Yamada A, Saito K, Hino R, Sugawara Y, Ono M, et al. Application of a tooth-surface coating material containing pre-reacted glass-ionomer fillers for caries prevention. Pediatr Dent J 2015;25:72-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdj.2015.08.003
  19. Miki S, Kitagawa H, Kitagawa R, Kiba W, Hayashi M, Imazato S. Antibacterial activity of resin composites containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler. Dent Mater 2016;32:1095-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.018
  20. Kaga M, Kakuda S, Ida Y, Toshima H, Hashimoto M, Endo K, et al. Inhibition of enamel demineralization by buffering effect of S-PRG filler-containing dental sealant. Eur J Oral Sci 2014;122:78-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12107
  21. Iijima M, Ito S, Nakagaki S, Kohda N, Muguruma T, Saito T, et al. Effects of immersion in solution of an experimental toothpaste containing S-PRG filler on like-remineralizing ability of etched enamel. Dent Mater J 2014;33:430-436. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-224
  22. Rusnac ME, Gasparik C, Irimie AI, Grecu AG, Mesaros AS, Dudea D. Giomers in dentistry - at the boundary between dental composites and glass-ionomers. Med Pharm Reports 2019;92:1-6. https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1169
  23. Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Moher D, Pereira-Cenci T. Research reporting guidelines in dentistry: a survey of editors. Braz Dent J 2017;28:3-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201601426
  24. Camilotti V, Zilly J, Busato PM, Nassar CA, Nassar PO. Desensitizing treatments for dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized, split-mouth clinical trial. Braz Oral Res 2012;26:263-268. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000300013
  25. Lopes AO, Aranha ACC. Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG laser and a desensitizer agent on the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a clinical study. Photomed Laser Surg 2013;31:132-138. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2012.3386
  26. Moura GF, Zeola LF, Silva MB, Sousa SC, Guedes FR, Soares PV. Four-session protocol effectiveness in reducing cervical dentin hypersensitivity: a 24-week randomized clinical trial. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 2019;37:117-123. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2018.4477
  27. Galvao AD, Zeola LF, Moura GF, Teixeira DNR, Gonzaga RCQ, da Silva GR, et al. A long-term evaluation of experimental potassium oxalate concentrations on dentin hypersensitivity reduction: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 2019;89:103180.
  28. Narayanan R, Prabhuji MLV, Paramashivaiah R, Bhavikatti SK. Low-level laser therapy in combination with desensitising agent reduces dentin hypersensitivity in fluorotic and non-fluorotic teeth - a randomised, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Oral Health Prev Dent 2019;17:547-556.
  29. Lopes AO, de Paula Eduardo C, Aranha ACC. Evaluation of different treatment protocols for dentin hypersensitivity: an 18-month randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 2017;32:1023-1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2203-0
  30. Younus MZ, Ahmed MA, Syed AUY, Baloch JM, Ali M, Sheikh A. Comparison between effectiveness of dentine desensitizer and one bottle self-etch adhesive on dentine hypersensitivity. Technol Health Care 2021;29:1153-1159. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-202636
  31. Askari M, Yazdani R. Comparison of two desensitizing agents for decreasing dentin hypersensitivity following periodontal surgeries: a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 2019;50:320-329.
  32. Yoshida Y, Inoue S. Chemical analyses in dental adhesive technology. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2012;48:141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2012.03.001
  33. Kwon SR, Dawson DV, Schenck DM, Fiegel J, Wertz PW. Spectrophotometric evaluation of potassium nitrate penetration into the pulp cavity. Oper Dent 2015;40:614-621. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-214-L
  34. Rosing CK, Fiorini T, Liberman DN, Cavagni J. Dentine hypersensitivity: analysis of self-care products. Braz Oral Res 2009;23 Supplement 1:56-63. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000500009
  35. Godoy CE, Consani S, Guimaraes AT, Laurindo BM, Mendonca MJ, Camilotti V. Effect of two desensitizing agents applied previous to in-office bleaching on the degree of whitening and dentin sensitivity: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Am J Dent 2021;34:70-74.
  36. Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:10-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00487.x
  37. Ali NY, Hassanein OE, Hamza HS, Baz MAE. Clinical efficacy of giomer versus sodium fluoride varnish for management of hypersensitivity: randomized control trail. Egypt Dent J 2021;67:905-915. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2020.51707.1371