DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In vivo dynamic migration of the posterior interosseous nerve across various elbow and forearm positions

  • Kensuke Ikuta (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hideaki Miyamoto (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine) ;
  • Takahiro Inui (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hirotaka Kawano (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2024.03.11
  • 심사 : 2024.06.20
  • 발행 : 2024.12.01

초록

Background: The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) is at risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during elbow surgery when using a lateral or posterolateral approach. Results of cadaveric studies indicated that maintaining forearm pronation throughout the surgery can help move the PIN away from the surgical window. However, in vivo dynamic migration of the PIN in response to changes in the elbow and forearm position is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the in vivo dynamic migration pattern of the PIN in response to changes in the elbow and forearm position using ultrasound imaging. Methods: This study included 43 upper extremities of 22 healthy volunteers (16 females; mean age, 29 years). Using ultrasound imaging, we measured the shortest distance from the radial head (RH) to the point where the PIN crossed the lateral aspect of the radial axis in six positions of the elbow and forearm: 90° forearm supination, 90° pronation, and neutral forearm position, each at 135° of elbow flexion and 0° of elbow extension. Results: The RH-to-nerve distance was greater during elbow extension than during elbow flexion regardless of the forearm position. However, the maximum migration distance was 3.5 mm when transitioning from elbow extension and forearm pronation (25.1 mm) to elbow flexion and forearm supination (21.6 mm). Conclusions: Although forearm pronation may help move the PIN away from the surgical window, care should be taken not to injure the nerve when performing elbow surgery using a lateral or posterolateral approach. Level of evidence: III.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hackl M, Wegmann K, Lappen S, Helf C, Burkhart KJ, Müller LP. The course of the posterior interosseous nerve in relation to the proximal radius: is there a reliable landmark? Injury 2015;46:687–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.028
  2. Kelly EW, Morrey BF, O'Driscoll SW. Complications of repair of the distal biceps tendon with the modified two-incision technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:1575–81. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200011000-00010
  3. Strauch RJ, Rosenwasser MP, Glazer PA. Surgical exposure of the dorsal proximal third of the radius: how vulnerable is the posterior interosseous nerve? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996;5:342–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(96)80064-4
  4. Diliberti T, Botte MJ, Abrams RA. Anatomical considerations regarding the posterior interosseous nerve during posterolateral approaches to the proximal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:809–13. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200006000-00007
  5. Calfee RP, Wilson JM, Wong AH. Variations in the anatomic relations of the posterior interosseous nerve associated with proximal forearm trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:81–90. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01242
  6. Hohenberger GM, Schwarz AM, Maier MJ, et al. Safe zone for the posterior interosseous nerve with regard to the lateral and posterior approaches to the proximal radius. Surg Radiol Anat 2018;40:1025–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2004-6
  7. Schwarz AM, Hohenberger GM, Weiglein AH, Riedl R, Staresinic M, Grechenig S. Avoiding radial nerve palsy in proximal radius shaft plating: a cadaver study. Injury 2017;48 Suppl 5:S34–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30736-2