DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A coupled vibration model of double-rod in cross flow for grid-to-rod fretting wear analysis

  • H. Huang (Southwest Jiaotong University, School of Aerospace and Engineering) ;
  • T. Liu (Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Mechanical Engineering) ;
  • P. Li (Southwest Jiaotong University, School of Aerospace and Engineering) ;
  • Y.R. Yang (Southwest Jiaotong University, School of Aerospace and Engineering)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.28
  • 심사 : 2023.11.26
  • 발행 : 2024.04.25

초록

In Pressurized Water Reactors, most of the failed fuel rods are often observed at the periphery of the fuel assembly, especially near the core baffle. The rod vibration-induced fretting wear is a significant failure mechanism strongly correlated with the coolant and support conditions. This paper presents a coupled vibration model of double-rod to predict the grid-to-rod fretting (GTRF) wear. A motion-dependent fluid force model is used to simulate the coolant cross flow, the gap constraints with asymmetric stiffness between spring and dimple on the vibration form, and the fretting wear are discussed. The results show the effect of the coupled vibration on the deterioration of wear, providing a sound theoretical explanation of some failure phenomena observed in the previous experiment. Exploratively, we analyze the impact of the baffle jet on the GTRF wear, which indicates that the high-velocity cross-flow will significantly affect the vibration forms while sharply changing the wear behavior.

키워드

과제정보

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos: 12072298; 12172311).

참고문헌

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Review of Fuel Failures in Water Cooled Reactors, 2010.
  2. M. Kennard, D. Sunderland, J. Harbottle, A Study of Grid-To-Rod Fretting Wear in PWR Fuel Assembly, Stoller Report, 1995.
  3. K.T. Kim, J.M. Suh, Impact of nuclear fuel assembly design on grid-to-rod fretting wear, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 46 (No. 2) (2009) 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2007.9711516
  4. IAEA-TECDOC-1119, Assessment and Management of Ageing of Major Nuclear Power Plant Components Important to Safety: PWR Vessel Internals, IAEA, 1999.
  5. B. Chatterjee, S.K. Gupta, H.S. Kushwaha, V.V. Raj, FIV of PWR fuel rods under local jets: instability threshold and influence of jet configuration, in: Transactions of the 14th International Conference on Structural Mechanics, Reactor Technology (SMiRT 14), 1997, pp. 17-22. Lyon, France, August.
  6. S.J. King, M.Y. Young, D.D. Seel, Etc., Flow Induced Vibration and Fretting Wear in PWR Fuel, Proceedings of ICONE10, Arlington, VA, 2002, pp. 14-18. April.
  7. A. Tekatlian, J. Rigaudeau, S. Aubert, Y. Jacques, Flow induced instabilities of fuel rods bundles subjected to a plane jet cross flow: experimental and numerical analysis, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. (Publ.) PVP 389 (1999) 57-63.
  8. K. Seki, S. Kuwabara, K. Tanimura, etc., A study on fuel rod vibration induced by baffle jet flow, Nucl. Technol. 74 (1) (1986) 27-37. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT86-A33816
  9. U. Bieder, A. Rashkovan, Baffle jetting: CFD analysis of plain jets impinging on fuel rods, Prog. Nucl. Energy 114 (2019) 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.02.006
  10. P.R. Rubiolo, Probabilistic prediction of fretting-wear damage of nuclear fuel rods, Nucl. Eng. Des. 236 (2006) 1628-1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.04.023
  11. R.Y. Lu, Z. Karoutas, T.L. Sham, CASL virtual reactor predictive simulation: grid-to-rod fretting wear, J. Met. 63 (2011) 53-58.
  12. Z.P. Hu, M.D. Thouless, W. Lu, Effects of gap size and excitation frequency on the vibrational behavior and wear rate of fuel rods, Nucl. Eng. Des. 308 (2016) 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.08.038
  13. H. Huang, P. Li, Y.R. Yang, Towards modeling of Grid to Rod and the effects of its nonlinear dynamic behaviors on grid-to-rod fretting wear, Ann. Nucl. Energy 180 (2023), 109481.
  14. W. Klinger, C. Petit, J. Willse, "Experience and Reliability of FRAMATOME ANP'S PWR and BWR Fuel", IAEA-TECDOC-1345, IAEA, Vienna, 2003.
  15. Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors, CASL Phase II Summary Report, 2020.
  16. S.S. Chen, A general theory for dynamic instability of tube arrays in crossflow, J. Fluid Struct. 1 (1987) 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-9746(87)90170-8
  17. P.M. Moretti, R.L. Lowery, Hydrodynamic inertia coefficients for a tube surrounded by rigid tubes, J. Pressure Vessel Technol. (1976) 190-193.
  18. H. Tanaka, S. Takahara, K. Ohta, Flow-induced vibration of tube arrays with various pitch-to-diameter ratios, J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 104 (1982) 168-174. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3264199
  19. S.S. Chen, S. Zhu, J.A. Jendrzejczyk, Fluid damping and fluid stiffness of a tube row in crossflow, J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 116 (1994) 370-383. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2929604
  20. S.S. Chen, Crossflow-induced vibrations of Heat exchanger tube banks, Nucl. Eng. Des. 47 (1978) 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(78)90005-5
  21. S.S. Chen, J.A. Jendrzejczyk, Stability of tube arrays in crossflow, Nucl. Eng. Des. 75 (1982) 351-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(83)90004-3
  22. S.S. Chen, S. Chandra, Fluidelastic instabilities in tube bundles exposed to nonuniform cross flow, J. Fluid Struct. 5 (1991) 299-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-9746(91)90497-D
  23. L. Wang, A further study on the non-linear dynamics of simply supported pipes conveying pulsating fluid, Int. J. Non Lin. Mech. 44 (2009) 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.08.010
  24. R.G. Sauv'e, W.W. Teper, Impact simulation of process equipment tubes and support plates-a numerical algorithm, J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 109 (1987) 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3264858
  25. W.T. Thomson, Theory of Vibration with Applications, fifth ed..
  26. M.P. Paidoussis, A review of flow-induced vibrations in reactors and reactor components, Nucl. Eng. Des. 74 (1982) 31-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(83)90138-3
  27. K.T. Kim, The study on grid-to-rod fretting wear models for PWR fuel, Nucl. Eng. Des. 239 (12) (2009) 2820-2824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.08.018
  28. P.R. Rubiolo, M.Y. Young, VITRAN: an advance statistic tool to evaluate fretting-wear damage, J. Power Energy Syst. 2 (No.1) (2008) 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1299/jpes.2.57
  29. K.T. Kim, The effect of fuel rod supporting conditions on fuel rod vibration characteristics and grid-to-rod fretting wear, Nucl. Eng. Des. 240 (6) (2010) 1386-1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.12.030