Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the gravity model commonly used for demand forecasting upon the implementation of new tourist facilities and analyze the main causation of forecasting errors to provide a suggestion on how to improve. Design/methodology/approach - This study first measured the errors in predicted values derived from past feasibility study reports by examining the cases of five national science museums. Next, to improve the predictive accuracy of the gravity model, the study identified the five most likely issues contributing to errors, applied modified values, and recalculated. The potential for improvement was then evaluated through a comparison of forecasting errors. Findings - First, among the five science museums with very similar characteristics, there was no clear indication of a decrease in the number of visitors to existing facilities due to the introduction of new facilities. Second, representing the attractiveness of tourist facilities using the facility size ratio can lead to significant prediction errors. Third, the impact of distance on demand can vary depending on the characteristics of the facility and the conditions of the area where the facility is located. Fourth, if the distance value is below 1, it is necessary to limit the range of that value to avoid having an excessively small value. Fifth, depending on the type of population data used, prediction results may vary, so it is necessary to use population data suitable for each latent market instead of simply using overall population data. Finally, if a clear trend is anticipated in a certain type of tourist behavior, incorporating this trend into the predicted values could help reduce prediction errors. Research implications or Originality - This study identified the key factors causing prediction errors by using national science museums as cases and proposed directions for improvement. Additionally, suggestions were made to apply the model more flexibly to enhance predictive accuracy. Since reducing prediction errors contributes to increased reliability of analytical results, the findings of this study are expected to contribute to policy decisions handled with more accurate information when running feasibility analyses.
Khadaroo, J. and B. Seetanah (2008), "The Role of Transport Infrastructure in International Tourism Development: A Gravity Model Approach", Tourism Management, 29, 831-840.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.09.005
Keum, K. (2010), "Tourism Flows and Trade Theory: A Panel Data Analysis with the Gravity Model", The Annals of Regional Science, 44, 541-557.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0275-2
Lorde, T., G. Li and D. Airey (2016), "Modeling Caribbean Tourism Demand: An Augmented Gravity Approach", Journal of Travel Research, 55(7), 946-956.https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287515592852
Morley, C., J. Rossello and M. Santana-Gallego (2014), "Gravity Models for Tourism Demand: Theory and Use", Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 1-10.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.05.008
Priego, F. J., J. Rossello and M. Santana-Gallego (2015), "The Impact of Climate Change on Domestic Tourism: A Gravity Model for Spain", Regional Environmental Change, 15, 291-300.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0645-5