References
- Bybee, R. W. (2014). NGSS and the Next Generation of Science Teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9381-4
- Cho, E., Kim, C., & Choe, S. (2018). A Study on the Plurality of Nature of Science in Science Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(5), 721-738.
- Cho, I., & Kang, W. (2018). An Analysis of Achievement Standards Statements in the Elementary Mathematics Curriculum of Korea. Journal of elementary mathematics education in Korea, 22(1), 69-92.
- Chong, Y., Chang, K., Tak, B., Kang, H., Seo, D., Park, S., Nam, J., Kim, G., Ko, H., Kim, J., & Kwon, N. (2016). A Comparative Study of Mathematics Curriculum among the United States, Singapore, England, Japan, Australia and Korea. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(3), 371-402.
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan Company.
- Do, S., Hwang, Y., & Park, J. (2009). The Importance of Reflection on the Middle School Science Experiment Class for Teaching the Nature of Science. Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 184-192.
- Dong, H., Kim, Y., & Ha, S. (2015). A Comparative Analysis of Achievement Standards of Korean Science Curriculum and Performance Expectation of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) in the United States: Content Elements and Objectives for Middle School Life Science. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 64(1), 95-125. https://doi.org/10.17253/swueri.2015.64..004
- Fulmer, G. W., Tanas, J., & Weiss, K. A. (2018). The challenges of alignment for the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1076-1100. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21481
- Gu, W. (2013). Exploring the Meaning of the Appropriateness of Curriculum Coverage and Depth based on the Analysis of Conflicting Issues. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and instruction, 13(2), 285-305.
- Jeon, S., Koh, H., Lee, Y., Kwak, Y., Choi, S., Kang, H., & Park, M. (2017). Development for "Science for All Koreans". Seoul: KOFAC.
- Kang, K. (2023). Comparison of Achievement Standards in Physic of 2015 and 2022 Revised Curriculum - Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 73(11), 941-948. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.73.941
- Kim, B., & Kim, K. (2024). A comparative study of the achievement standards of the 2015 and 2022 revised national English curriculum based on Bloom's revised taxonomy of educational objectives. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and instruction, 24(1), 775-788.
- Kim, D., Han, K., & Jeong, D. (2016). Research on the talent of 2045 future society and milestone of core science competencies. Seoul: KOFAC.
- Kim, E., Kim, J., & Kim, H. (2020). Comparative Analysis of the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum and US Next Generation Science Standards -Focusing on Ecosystem Related Concepts in Middle School and High School Courses-. Biology Education, 48(2), 288-307.
- Kim, H., Kang, N., Kim, M., Maeng, S., Park, J., Baek, Y., Son, J. W., Shim, K., Oh, P. S., Lee, G., Lee, B., Joung, Y., Han, I. (2017). Basic research for next generation science education standards. Seoul: KOFAC.
- Kim, H., & Lim, H. (2019). Comparison of TIMSS 2019 Science Framework and Korean Middle School Science Curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and instruction, 19(18), 1221-1242.
- Kim, H., & Song, J. (2019). Comprehensive Comparison of NGSS and KSES and Analysis of Physics Content Elements of Performance Expectations Based on the TIMSS Science Framework. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 69(9), 916-931. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.69.916
- Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity [KOFAC]. (2019). Korean Science Education Standards for the Next Generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
- Kwak, Y. Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2017). Ways to Improve In-Service Science Teachers' Expertise with the Introduction of 'Integrated Science' in the 2015 Revised Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 263-271.
- Han, J., Kwon, Y., & Oh, H. (2023). Analyzing the adequacy of the Contents of the 2022 Revised Science Curriculum - Elementary School 'Earth and Universe' Units -. School Science Journal, 17(2), 120-137. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.17.2.202305.120
- Hong, J., Kim, H., & Hong, H. (2021). Comparison of the Science Curriculum of Korea and Singapore: Focus on the Chemistry. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 65(5), 370-381.
- Lee, J. (2023). Characteristics of the 2015 and 2022 Revised National Curriculum and Future Tasks Through International Comparative Study. Journal of Future Society, 14(3), 35-61.
- Lee, K. (2006). A Case Study on Teacher's Understanding of Curriculum Affecting on Curriculum Implementation. The Journal of Curriculum & Evaluation, 9(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2006.9.2.1
- Lee, S. (2021). Exploring Cognitive Achievement Characteristics by Group of Achievement Levels in the PISA 2018 Science Domain and Education for Cultivating Epistemic Knowledge in the National Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 41(5), 401-414.
- Leem, Y., & Kim, Y. (2016). A Historical Study on the Korean Science Education Development Plans for the Elementary and Secondary Schools. Biology Education, 44(2), 210-221. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2016.44.2.210
- Lim, Y. (2023). A Critical Review of the 'Key Ideas' in the 2022 Revised National Curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 23(18), 747-768. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2023.23.18.747
- Lim, Y., & Jang, S. (2015). A Study on the Reduction of Educational Contents in the 2015 Revised National Science Curriculum: Focousing on the Common Curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and instruction, 15(12), 437-460.
- Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 Revised general curriculum. Sejong: Author.
- Ministry of Education. (2022). 2022 Revised general curriculum. Sejong: Author.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Paik, N. (2014). Review of statements of achievement standards in subject curriculum: Focusing on the national science curriculum of Republic of Korea and the U. S. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 101-131. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.32.2.201406.005
- Park, D., Kwon, M., Ha, S., & Choi, H. (2023). A Study on the Vertical Articulation of Physics in the 2015 Revised National Curriculum: Focused on the Middle School Science and the High School Integrated Science. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 73(6), 515-529. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.73.515
- Park, J., & Kim, D. (2008). Development of Teaching Materials for the Nature of Science and Pilot Application to Scientifically Gifted Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(2), 169-179.
- Park, K., & Jeong, H. (2018). International Comparison Study on the Science & Practical Arts (Technology.Home Economics) Curricula about Continuity of the 'System' and 'Energy' as a Big Concepts. Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2018.42.1.27
- Pruitt, S. L. (2017). The Next Generation Science Standards: The Features and Challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 145-156.
- Rodriquez, A. J. (2015). What about a dimension of engagement, equity, and diversity practices? A critique of the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 1031-1051. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21232
- Saylor, J. G., & Alexandre, W. M. (1974). Planning curriculum for schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Seo, D., Lee, Y., & Jho, H. (2017). Development and Implementation of the History of Science and Technology Program for Understanding of Technical High School Students about the Nature of Science. Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 60-79. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2017.41.1.60
- Song, E., Je, M., Cha, K., & Yoo, J. (2016). Analysis of the Verbs in the 2009 Revised National Science Curriculum-from the Viewpoint of Cognitive Domain of TIMSS Assessment Framework. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 607-616. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0607
- Song, J., Kang, S.-J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Na, J., Do, J.-H., Park, S. C., Son, Y.-A, Son, J. W., Oh, P. S., Lee, J.-K., Lee, H. J., Ihm, H., Jeong, D. H., Joung, Y. J., Kim, J. (2019). Developing Performance Expectations, School Implementation Strategies, Evaluation Indicators of the Korean Science Education Standards (KSES) for the Next Generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
- Wee, S., Kim, B., Cho, H., Sohn, J., & Oh, C. (2011). Comparison of Instructional Objectives of the 2007 Revised Elementary Science Curriculum with 7th Elementary Curriculum based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(1), 10-21.
- Yoon, H., & Cheong, Y. (2017). Comparison of the Science Curricula of Korea, the United States, England, and Singapore: Focus on the Concept of Energy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 799-812.