Safety and Health at Work

  • 제15권1호
  • /
  • Pages.80-86
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2093-7911(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-7997(eISSN)
산업안전보건연구원 (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Work Ability Index: Psychometric Testing in Aeronautical Industry Workers

  • 투고 : 2023.03.15
  • 심사 : 2023.12.03
  • 발행 : 2024.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: The Work Ability Index (WAI) is an instrument that measures work ability. The wide dispersion of the WAI internationally has led to its adaptation for use in different countries. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the WAI. Methods: A methodological design was used over an opportunistic sample of 233 workers in the aeronautical industry in Spain. Reliability was evaluated through internal consistency. Factorial validity, known groups, and convergent validity were tested. Results: The Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation indicated an adequate internal consistency. The confirmatory factor analysis, performed to evaluate the factorial validity, found adequate fit indices for a two-factor solution with a high correlation between the factors. Factor 1, "Subjectively estimated work ability and resources", was composed of 3 subscales and factor 2, "Ill-health-related", of 2 subscales. Subscales 4 and 6 had loading in both factors. Workers under 45 years of age obtained higher significant scores than older ones. Convergent validity was also evidenced since WAI was highly correlated with self-assessment of health status. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the WAI has shown evidence of reliability and validity in this study, supporting its use in individual and collective health surveillance by occupational health professionals. The factorial solution that was found has previously been reported in another international context. However, further research is needed to resolve the discrepancies detected in the role of some subscales between other national and international studies.

키워드

과제정보

The authors would like to thank the workers for their generosity in agreeing to participate in the study. This research work has been awarded by The Royal Academy of Medicine and Surgery of Seville with the "Dr. Pedro de Castro Sanchez Award".

참고문헌

  1. Pappa S, Ntella V, Giannakas T, Giannakoulis VG, Papoutsi E, Katsaounou P. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Brain Behav Immun Health 2020;88:901-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.026
  2. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Eskelinen L, Jarvinen E, Toikkanen J, Klockars M. Prevalence and incidence rates of diseases and work ability in different work categories of municipal occupations. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991;17(1):67-74.  https://doi.org/10.1037/t58607-000
  3. Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Klockars M. Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997;23:49-57. 
  4. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work Ability Index. 2nd revised ed. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1998. 
  5. Ebener M, Hasselhorn HM. Validation of short measures of work ability for research and employee surveys. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:3386. 
  6. Alexopoulos EC, Merekoulias G, Gnardellis C, Jelastopulu E. Work ability index: validation of the Greek version and descriptive data in heavy industry employees. Br J Med Med Res 2016;3:608-21. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2013/2552. 
  7. Lundin A, Leijon OLA, Vaez M, Hallgren M, Torgen M. Predictive validity of the work ability index and its individual items in the general population. Scand J Public Health 2017;45:350-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817702759. 
  8. Freyer M, Formazin M, Rose U. Factorial validity of the work ability index among employees in Germany. J Occup Rehabil 2018;29:433-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9803-9. 
  9. Peralta N, Godoi Vasconcelos AG, Harter Griep R, Miller L. Validity and reliability of the work ability index in primary care workers in Argentina. Salud Colect 2012;8:163-73. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1851-82652012000200005. 
  10. Rodriguez MG, Lopez PGM, Marrero SML. Confiabilidad test-retest del cuestionario 'Indice de capacidad de trabajo' en trabajadores de la salud de servicios hospitalarios de Arroyo Naranjo, La Habana. Rev Cub Salud Publica 2013;14(2):45-54. 
  11. Lopez Pumar GM, del Castillo Martin NP, Viera AO. Validation and reliability of the Cuban version of the work ability index (WAI) questionnaire. Rev Cuba Salud Trab 2011;12:29-34. 
  12. Cordeiro TMSC, Araujo TM, Santos KOB. Exploratory study of the validity and internal consistency of the work ability index among health workers. Salud Colect 2018;14:713-24. https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2018.1342. 
  13. Mazloumi A, Rostamabadi A, Ehsan G. Validity and reliability of work ability index (WAI) questionnaire among Iranian workers; a study in petrochemical and car manufacturing industries. J Occup Health 2019;61:165-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12028. 
  14. Schouten LS, Joling CI, van der Gulden JW, Heymans MW, Bultmann U, Roelen CAM. Screening manual and office workers for risk of long-term sickness absence: cut-off points for the Work Ability Index. Scand J Work Environ Health 2015;41:36-42. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3465. 
  15. Mateo Rodriguez I, Knox ECL, Oliver Hernandez C, Daponte Codina A., The esTAR Group. Psychometric properties of the work ability index in health centre workers in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(24):12988. 
  16. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST). Work Ability Index: version espanola. Notas Tecnicas de Prevencion no 1147. INSST; 2020. 
  17. Bascour-Sandoval C, Soto-Rodriguez F, Munoz-Poblete C, Marzuca-Nassr GN. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the work ability index in working individuals. J Occup Rehabil 2020;30(2):288-97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09871-0
  18. Consejo Economico y Social de Espana. La industria en Espana: propuestas para su desarrollo. Madrid: Consejo Economico y Social de Espana. Report 04/2019. Available from: https://www.ces.es/documents/10180/5209150/Inf0419.pdf. 
  19. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Sydney: Wolter Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012. 
  20. Ferrando PJ, Anguiano-Carrasco C. El analisis factorial como tecnica de investigacion en psicologia [Factorial analysis as a research technique in psichology]. Papeles del Psicol 2010;31(1):18-33. 
  21. Mc Callum A, Freitag D, Pereira F. Maximum entropy Markov models for information extraction and segmentation. In: Proceedings of ICML 2000. p. 591-8. 
  22. Abellan-Garcia A. Percepcion del estado de salud. Rev Multidiscip Gerontol 2003;13(5):340-2. 
  23. Oviedo HC, Campo-Arias A. Aproximacion al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr 2005;34(4):572-80.  https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v26i4.327
  24. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 2006;119(2). 166.e7-16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036
  25. De Vaus D. Surveys in social research. 5th ed. Routledge; 2004. 
  26. Martus P, Jakob O, Rose U, Seibt R, Freude G. A comparative analysis of the Work Ability Index. Occup Med (Lond) 2010;60(7):517-24.  https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq093
  27. Kline P. An easy guide to factor analysis. Sage; 1994. 
  28. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990;107(2):238-46.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  29. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999;6(1):1-55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  30. Joreskog KG, Sorbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1993. 
  31. Ilmarinen JE. Aging workers. Occup Environ Med 2001;58(8):546. 
  32. Schafer MH, Shippee TP. Age identity, gender, and perceptions of decline: does feeling older lead to pessimistic dispositions about cognitive aging? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2010;65(1):91-6.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp046
  33. Chan YH. Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. Singapore Med J 2003;44(12):614-9. 
  34. Adel M, Akbar R, Ehsan G. Validity and reliability of work ability index (WAI) questionnaire among Iranian workers; a study in petrochemical and car manufacturing industries. J Occup Health 2019;61(2):165-74.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12028
  35. Borner K, Scherf C, Leitner-Mai B, Spanner-Ulmer B. Field study of agedifferentiated strain for assembly line workers in the automotive industry. Work 2012;41(1):5160-6.  https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1002-5160
  36. Radkiewicz P, Widerszal-Bazyl M. Psychometric properties of Work Ability Index in the light of comparative survey study. Int Congr Ser 2005;1280:304-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.02.089
  37. Cordeiro TMSCE, Araujo TM, Santos KOB. Exploratory study of the validity and internal consistency of the Work Ability Index among health workers. Salud Colect 2018;14(4):713-24 [Spanish].  https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2018.1342
  38. Cadiz DM, Brady G, Rineer JR, Truxillo DM. A review and synthesis of the work ability literature. Work Aging Retire 2019;5(1):114-38.  https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/way010
  39. Freyer M. Eine Konstruktvalidierung des Work Ability Index anhand einer reprasentativen Stichprobe von Erwerbstatigen in Deutschland. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt fur Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin; 2019. https://doi.org/10.21934/baua:bericht20190529. Project number: F 2250.