참고문헌
- Harris JR, Levene MB, Svensson G, Hellman S. Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1979;5(02):257-261 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(79)90729-6
- Patterson MP, Pezner RD, Hill LR, Vora NL, Desai KR, Lipsett JA. Patient self-evaluation of cosmetic outcome of breast-preserving cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985;11(10):1849-1852 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(85)90044-6
- Westreich M. Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100(02):468-479 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199708000-00032
- Kwon SH, Lao WW, Lee CH, et al. Experiences and attitudes toward aesthetic procedures in East Asia: a cross-sectional survey of five geographical regions. Arch Plast Surg 2021;48(06):660-669 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.02565
- Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Amaral N, et al. Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast 2007;16(05):456-461 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2007.05.002
- Krois W, Romar AK, Wild T, et al. Objective breast symmetry analysis with the breast analyzing tool (BAT): improved tool for clinical trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017;164(02):421-427 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4255-z
- Monton J, Kenig N, Chang-Azancot L, Jordan J, Insausti R. A free tool for breast aesthetic scale computation. Ann Plast Surg 2021;86(04):458-462 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002440
- Pezner RD, Patterson MP, Hill LR, et al. Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985;11(03):575-578 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(85)90190-7
- Cardoso JS, Silva W, Cardoso MJ. Evolution, current challenges, and future possibilities in the objective assessment of aesthetic outcome of breast cancer locoregional treatment. Breast 2020;49:123-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.11.006
- Goncalves T, Silva W, Cardoso MJ, et al. A novel approach to keypoint detection for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer surgery outcomes. Health Technol (Berl) 2020;10(04):891-903 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-020-00423-8
- Najmiddinov B, Park JK, Yoon KH, et al. Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes. Front Surg 2022;9:1001019
- Myung Y, Jeon S, Heo C, et al. Validating machine learning approaches for prediction of donor related complication in microsurgical breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep 2021;11(01):5615
- Park JK, Park S, Heo CY, Jeong JH, Yun B, Myung Y. The safety of operating on breasts with a history of prior reduction mammoplasty: dynamic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of angiogenesis. Aesthet Surg J 2022;42(03):NP151-NP158 https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab318
- Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS, Oliveira HP, Gouveia P. The breast cancer conservative treatment. Cosmetic results - BCCT.core - Software for objective assessment of esthetic outcome in breast cancer conservative treatment: a narrative review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2016;126:154-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.11.010
- Han HH, Choi JM, Eom JS. Objective photographic assessments and comparisons of immediate bilateral breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps and implants. Arch Plast Surg 2021;48(05):473-482 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.02362
- Kim DY, Lee SJ, Kim EK, et al. Feasibility of anomaly score detected with deep learning in irradiated breast cancer patients with reconstruction. NPJ Digit Med 2022;5(01):125