DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국립공원 타당성검토에 따른 공원재계획 평가 - 한려해상국립공원 구역조정을 중심으로 -

Evaluation of Park Re-planning by Feasibility Study in Korea National Parks - Focusing on Area Adjustment of Hallyeohaesang National Park -

  • 조우 (상지대학교 조경산림학과)
  • Woo Cho (Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Forest Science, Sanigji Univ.)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.02
  • 심사 : 2024.01.08
  • 발행 : 2024.02.28

초록

본 연구는 국립공원계획 타당성검토의 구역조정 기준과 방법을 한려해상국립공원에 적용하여 평가 하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 구역조정 대상지 도출에 이용되는 생태기반평가 결과 편입 검토가 가능한 생태기반평가 I등급은 10.0%, II등급 40.4%로 분석되었다. 해제 검토가 가능한 V등급은 9.9%이었다. 편입 및 해제 적합성 평가 결과 편입대상 면적은 35.150km2(육상 3.669km2, 해상 31.481km2)이었고 해제 대상 면적은 육상 0.071km2이었다. 지자체와 지역주민이 공익상 또는 주민편의를 위해 공원구역 해제를 요구하는 곳에서는 총 면적이 변화되지 않는 범위 내에서 해제 검토가 가능하며, 이것을 상호교환이라 한다. 상호교환에 의해 결정된 해제 면적은 10.386km2이었다. 이것은 해제 적합성 평가에 의해 도출된 면적의 146배에 달했다. 상호교환으로 해제되는 지역을 생태기반평가와 매칭한 결과 해제를 절대 할 수 없는 I,II등급에 해당하는 곳이 70.6%(7.321km2) 이었다. 결과적으로 한려해상국립공원 타당성검토의 구역조정은 생태기반평가나 해제 적합성 평가 결과가 매우 제한적으로 적용되었음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 상호교환이 국립공원 계획 타당성검토 중 구역조정의 핵심이었다.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the area adjustment criteria and methods of the feasibility study of national park plans by applying them to Hallyeohaesang National Park. As a result of the ecological-based assessment used to identify the adjustment target areas, the ecological-based assessment Grades I and II that can be considered for inclusion were analyzed as 10.0% and 40.4%, respectively. Grade V, which can be considered for release, was 9.9%. As a result of the inclusion and release suitability assessment, the area subject to inclusion was 35.150 km2 (3.669 km2 on land and 31.481 km2 at sea), and the area subject to release was 0.071 km2 on land. When local governments and residents request the release of a park area for public interest or convenience, the release can be considered as long as the total area does not change, which is called a mutual exchange. The release area determined by mutual exchange was 10.386 km2. It was 146 times the area determined by the suitability assessment for release. Matching the areas released by the mutual exchange with the ecological-based assessment, 70.6% (7.321 km2) was in Grades I and II, which can never be released. As a result, it was determined that the area adjustment of the feasibility study of Hallyeohaesang National Park was based on a very limited application of the results of the ecological-based assessment or the release suitability assessment. Also, mutual exchange was the key to area adjustment of the feasibility studies of national parks.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2022년 상지대학교 연구년의 결과임.

참고문헌

  1. CBD(2023) Kunming-montreal global biodiversity framework. https://www.cbd.int/gbf/ 
  2. Cho, W.(2015) Achievements and limitations of the Baekdudaegan Protected Area resource status survey. Seminar Presentation. (in Korean) 
  3. Cho, W.(2019) Legislative direction for improving the natural park protection and management system. Policy Workshop of S.D. Lee(Congressman). (in Korean) 
  4. Cho, W.(2021) Development impact based on area adjustment of feasibility review in Bukhansan National Park Planning. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 35(3): 305-312. (in Korean with English abstract)  https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2021.35.3.305
  5. Cho, W.(2022) Report on policy recommendations to restore national parks functional normalization. (in Korean) 
  6. Elaws of Japan(2024) https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=332AC0000000161 
  7. Hong, S.W. and W. Cho(2023) Analyze the suitability on the criteria and methods of national park re-planning, Korea. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 37(6): 484-498. (in Korean with English abstract)  https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2023.37.6.484
  8. Hong, S.W.(2023) Study on impact of natural park re-planning on park management and local development, South Korea. Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School of Sangji University. (in Korean with English abstract) 
  9. IPBES(2019) The global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 
  10. KNPS(2023) https://www.knps.or.kr/front/portal/visit/visitCourseMain.do?parkId=120300&menuNo=7020103 
  11. Korea National Park Research Institute(2019) 2019 national park leisure and recreation survey. NPRI 2020-02. (in Korean) 
  12. Laws of Japan (2024) https://www.e-laws.e-gov.go.jp/
  13. KDPA(2024) http://www.kdpa.kr/ 
  14. Ministry of Environment(2022) Master plan for the third nature parks. (in Korean) 
  15. Ministry of Environment(2023) https://www.me.go.kr/home/web/board/ 
  16. Ministry of Environment, KEI(2019) Establishment of national park feasibility study critera(third) and natural park system improvement. (in Korean) 
  17. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan(2024a) https://www.env.go.jp/content/900492661.pdf 
  18. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan(2024b) https://www.env.go.jp/content/000048029.pdf 
  19. Yayoi, H.(2011) America's national parks law. Hokkaido Univ. Press, 226pp. (in Japanese)