Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제49권1호
  • /
  • Pages.8.1-8.12
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Dental Practicality Index training using an online video on decision-making and confidence level in treatment planning by dental undergraduates

  • Zhai Wei See (School of Dentistry, International Medical University) ;
  • Ming Sern Lee (School of Dentistry, International Medical University) ;
  • Abhishek Parolia (School of Dentistry, International Medical University) ;
  • Shalini Kanagasingam (School of Dentistry, Faculty of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire) ;
  • Shilpa Gunjal (School of Dentistry, International Medical University) ;
  • Shanon Patel (Department of Endodontology, King's College London Dental Institute)
  • 투고 : 2023.10.15
  • 심사 : 2023.11.14
  • 발행 : 2024.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Dental Practicality Index (DPI) training using an online video on the treatment planning decisions and confidence level of dental undergraduates (DUs). Materials and Methods: Ninety-four DUs were shown 15 clinical case scenarios and asked to decide on treatment plans based on 4 treatment options. The most appropriate treatment plan had been decided by a consensus panel of experienced dentists. DUs then underwent DPI training using an online video. In a post-DPI-training test, DUs were shown the same clinical case scenarios and asked to assign the best treatment option. After 6 weeks, DUs were retested to assess their knowledge retention. In all 3 tests, DUs completed the confidence level scale questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank test and the independent-samples Mann-Whitney U test with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. Results: DPI training significantly improved the mean scores of the DUs from 7.53 in the pre-DPI-training test to 9.01 in the post-DPI-training test (p < 0.001). After 6 weeks, the mean scores decreased marginally to 8.87 in the retention test (p = 0.563). DPI training increased their confidence level from 5.68 pre-DPI training to 7.09 post-DPI training. Conclusions: Training DUs using DPI with an online video improved their decision-making and confidence level in treatment planning.

키워드

과제정보

The project was funded by the International Medical University, Malaysia.

참고문헌

  1. Ali K, Tredwin C, Kay EJ, Slade A, Pooler J. Preparedness of dental graduates for foundation training: a qualitative study. Br Dent J 2014;217:145-149. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.648
  2. Ali K, Slade A, Kay E, Zahra D, Tredwin C. Preparedness of undergraduate dental students in the United Kingdom: a national study. Br Dent J 2017;222:472-477. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.272
  3. Curry MC. The utilization of case difficulty assessment when determining endodontic referral. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2010.
  4. Falcon HC, Richardson P, Shaw MJ, Bulman JS, Smith BG. Developing an index of restorative dental treatment need. Br Dent J 2001;190:479-486. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801010a
  5. McCreery AM, Truelove E. Decision making in dentistry. Part I: a historical and methodological overview. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:447-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90241-N
  6. Simon DS. Endodontic case difficulty assessment: the team approach. Gen Dent 1999;47:340-344.
  7. McDonald A, Setchell D. Developing a tooth restorability index. Dent Update 2005;32:343-344, 346-348. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2005.32.6.343
  8. Royal College of Surgeons. Index of treatment need complexity assessment. London: Royal College of Surgeons; 2001.
  9. Muthukrishnan A, Owens J, Bryant S, Dummer PM. Evaluation of a system for grading the complexity of root canal treatment. Br Dent J 2007;202:E26.
  10. Dawood A, Patel S. The Dental Practicality Index - assessing the restorability of teeth. Br Dent J 2017;222:755-758. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.447
  11. Al-Nuaimi N, Ciapryna S, Chia M, Patel S, Mannocci F. A prospective study on the effect of coronal tooth structure loss on the 4-year clinical survival of root canal retreated teeth and retrospective validation of the Dental Practicality Index. Int Endod J 2020;53:1040-1049. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13322
  12. Bhuva B, Giovarruscio M, Rahim N, Bitter K, Mannocci F. The restoration of root filled teeth: a review of the clinical literature. Int Endod J 2021;54:509-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13438
  13. Tifooni A, Al-Nuaimi N, Dawood A, Mannocci F, Patel S. Validation of the effectiveness of the Dental Practicality Index in predicting the outcome of root canal retreatments. Int Endod J 2019;52:1403-1409. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13142
  14. Meyers IA. Herodontics - is there a place for maintaining the apparently hopeless tooth? Aust Dent J 2019;64(Supplement 1):S71-S79. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12698
  15. Hamer S, Kanagasingam S, Sonde N, Mannocci F, Patel S. The impact of the Dental Practicality Index on treatment planning. Br Dent J 2021;
  16. Xhaferi B, Xhaferi G. Online learning benefits and challenges during the COVID 19 - pandemic-students' perspective from SEEU. SEEU Review 2020;15:86-103. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2020-0006
  17. Dhawan S. Online learning: a panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. J Educ Technol Syst 2020;49:5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  18. Liew J, Zainal Abidin I, Cook N, Kanagasingam S. Clinical decision-making in complex endodontic cases between postgraduate students across dental specialties at a UK dental school: a pilot study. Eur J Dent Educ 2022;26:707-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12751
  19. McCaul LK, McHugh S, Saunders WP. The influence of specialty training and experience on decision making in endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Int Endod J 2001;34:594-606. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00433.x
  20. Dental Protection. Dental protection continuum series - complexity. Leeds: Dental Protection; 2016.
  21. Bell DS, Harless CE, Higa JK, Bjork EL, Bjork RA, Bazargan M, et al. Knowledge retention after an online tutorial: a randomized educational experiment among resident physicians. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:1164-1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0604-2
  22. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984;74:979-983. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.74.9.979
  23. Sander P, Sanders L. Measuring academic behavioural confidence: the ABC scale revisited. Stud High Educ 2009;34:19-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802457058
  24. Wittink DR, Bayer LR. The measurement imperative. Mark Res 1994;6:14-22.
  25. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006;296:1094-1102. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1094
  26. Stewart J, O'Halloran C, Barton JR, Singleton SJ, Harrigan P, Spencer J. Clarifying the concepts of confidence and competence to produce appropriate self-evaluation measurement scales. Med Educ 2000;34:903-909. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00728.x
  27. Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4:CD001431.