DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Two Cases of Robot-Assisted Totally Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Colon Interposition for Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Surgical Considerations

  • Kinam Shin (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • In Ha Kim (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Yun-Ho Jeon (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chung Sik Gong (Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Chan Wook Kim (Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Yong-Hee Kim (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2023.09.19
  • 심사 : 2023.12.07
  • 발행 : 2024.05.05

초록

This case report presents 2 patients with gastroesophageal junction cancer who both underwent totally minimally invasive esophagectomy with colon interposition. Patients 1 and 2, who were 43-year-old and 78-year-old men, respectively, had distinct clinical presentations and medical histories. Patient 1 underwent minimally invasive robotic esophagectomy with a laparoscopic total gastrectomy, colonic conduit preparation, and intrathoracic esophago-colono-jejunostomy. Patient 2 underwent completely robotic total gastrectomy, colon conduit preparation, and intrathoracic esophago-colono-jejunostomy. The primary challenge in colon interposition is assessing colon vascularity and ensuring an adequate conduit length, which is critical for successful anastomosis. In both cases, we used indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to evaluate vascularity. Determining the appropriate conduit is challenging; therefore, it is crucial to ensure a slightly longer conduit during reconstruction. Because totally minimally invasive colon interposition can reduce postoperative pain and enhance recovery, this surgical technique is feasible and beneficial.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akiyama H, Miyazono H, Tsurumaru M, Hashimoto C, Kawamura T. Use of the stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Surg 1978;188:606-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197811000-00004
  2. Karliczek A, Benaron DA, Zeebregts CJ, Wiggers T, van Dam GM. Intraoperative ischemia of the distal end of colon anastomoses as detected with visible light spectroscopy causes reduction of anastomotic strength. J Surg Res 2009;152:288-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2008.04.017
  3. Peters JH, Kronson JW, Katz M, DeMeester TR. Arterial anatomic considerations in colon interposition for esophageal replacement. Arch Surg 1995;130:858-63. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430080060009
  4. Trastulli S, Munzi G, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Rossi M, Parisi A. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography versus standard intraoperative methods for prevention of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2021;108:359-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaa139
  5. Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer N, et al. Indocyanine green for the prevention of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2019;33:384-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6503-7
  6. Yun JK, Chong BK, Kim HJ, et al. Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis. Dis Esophagus 2020;33:doz071. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doz071
  7. Cuk P, Kjaer MD, Mogensen CB, Nielsen MF, Pedersen AK, Ellebaek MB. Short-term outcomes in robot-assisted compared to laparoscopic colon cancer resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022;36:32-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08782-7