DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Loan Comparison Platform User's Default Risk

대출중개 플랫폼별 고객의 채무불이행 리스크 비교

  • 이성우 (동아대학교 산학협력단) ;
  • 김연국 (동아대학교 경영정보학과)
  • Received : 2024.03.14
  • Accepted : 2024.04.11
  • Published : 2024.04.30

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a significant growth in loan comparson services offered by fintech platforms in South Korea. However, it has been reported that loan comparison platform users tend to have a higher risk of default compared to non-users. This paper investigates the difference in platform-specific credit risk factors using survival analysis models - Kaplan-Meier curves and Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model. Our findings show that, relative to non-users, users of loan comparison platforms are characterized by elevated default rates, a greater propensity for home ownership, lower credit scores, and shorter loan durations. Furthermore, our AFT models elucidate the variance in default risk among the various loan comparison service platforms, highlighting the imperative for customized strategies that address the unique risk profiles of customers on each platform.

2019년 금융위원회의 온라인 대출 중개 서비스 도입 허용에 따라 핀다와 토스같은 핀테크 대출중개 플랫폼들이 가파르게 성장하였다. 하지만 대출중개 플랫폼으로 대출을 받은 고객들은 기존의 모집법인을 통해 대출을 받은 고객들보다 채무불이행 위험도가 더 높은 것으로 보고되었다. 본 연구는 생존분석 기법을 통해 신용대출을 받기 위해 대출중개 플랫폼을 통해 대출을 받은 고객들과 모집법인을 통해 대출을 받은 고객들의 채무불이행 위험도를 비교하고 각 대출중개 플랫폼별로 고객들의 채무불이행에 영향을 주는 특성들을 비교하였다. 분석을 위해 국내 캐피털사의 고객 데이터를 활용하였으며 카플란-마이어 분석 및 AFT 모형을 활용하였다. 모집법인을 통해 대출을 받은 고객들에 비해 대출중개 플랫폼을 통해 대출을 받은 고객들은 개인사업자보다 일반 대출자의 비중이 높고 부동산을 소유하고 있을 확률이 높았으며 대출진행기간이 더 짧았다. 또한 대출진행기간 중앙값(385일)을 기준으로 채무불이행 발생 비율이 더 높았다. AFT 모형을 통해 채무불이행 발생 시기를 분석한 결과 대출중개 플랫폼은 모두 모집법인에 비해 채무불이행 발생 확률이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 대출중개 플랫폼을 통해 대출을 받은 고객의 특성들이 채무불이행 발생 시기에 주는 영향은 플랫폼별로 상이하게 나타났다. 이 결과는 대출중개 플랫폼별로 고객의 리스크 차이를 고려한 맞춤형 전략이 필요함을 보여준다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No.2022R1G1A1010457)

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (2010). Survival Analysis Using SAS: A Practical Guide, Sas Institute. 
  2. Antwi, S., Mills, A. E. F. E., Mills, A. Zhao, X. (2012). Risk Factors of Loan Default Payment in Ghana: A Case Study of Akuapem Rural Bank. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 2(4), 376-386. 
  3. Banasik, J., Crook, J. N. and Thomas, L. C. (1999). Not If but When Will Borrowers Default. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(12), 1185-1190.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600851
  4. Cao, R., Vilar, J. M. and Devia, A. (2009). Modelling Consumer Credit Risk via Survival Analysis. SORT: statistics and operations research transactions, 33(1), 0003-30. 
  5. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression Models and Life Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187-202  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x
  6. Dirick, L., Claeskens, G. and Baesens, B. (2017). Time to Default in Credit Scoring Using Survival Analysis: A Benchmark Study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68, 652-665.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0128-9
  7. Gross, D. B. and Souleles, N. S. (2002). An Empirical Analysis of Personal Bankruptcy and Delinquency. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(1), 319-347.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.1.319
  8. Ham, J. H., Kim, J. I. and Lee, Y. S. (2010). Risk Analysis of Household Debt in Korea: Using Micro CB Data. KDI Journal of Economic P olicy, 32(4), 1-34. 
  9. Hassan, M. K., Brodmann, J., Rayfield, B. and Huda, M. (2018). Modeling Credit Risk in Credit Unions Using Survival Analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(3), 482-495.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-05-2017-0091
  10. Jang, C. W. and Kim, Y. K. (2022). Analyzing Users of Loan Comparison Platforms in South Korea. Korean Computers and Accounting Review, 20(3), 93-110. 
  11. Joo, Y. J. and Kwon, H. G. (2017). The Effect of Bank's Service Quality on Customer Satisfacton, Relationship Intention and Cross-Buying Intention. Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems, 22(3), 95-107 
  12. Jung, J. H. (2021). Challenges and Prospects of Financial Platform Regulation. Business finance law, 108(0), 70-81. 
  13. Kang, S. W. and Kim, K. H. (2018). Accelerated Failure Time Models for Right Censored Failure Time Data. Journal of the Korean Data And Information Science Society, 29(6), 1365-1379.  https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2018.29.6.1365
  14. Kaplan, E. L. and P. Meier (1958), Non-parametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457-481.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
  15. Kim, H. S. (2020). Financial Platform and Competitive Factors in the Open Banking. Journal of New Industry and Business, 38(2), 159-186  https://doi.org/10.30753/EMR.2020.38.2.007
  16. Kim, J. B. and Noh, H. G. (2019). A Review and Implications of the Interim Note on "Toward Function-based, Cross-sectoral Financial Regulations" by Japan Financial Services Agency. KIF Other Report, 2019 (4), 1-142. 
  17. Kim, J. S. (2022). Case Studies on the Use and Response of Online Loan Comparison Platforms by Major Overseas Banks. KB Financial Group, 1. 
  18. Kim, M. G., Kim, S. H. and Ryu, M. H. (2023). User's preferences on Bank Channels. Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems, 28(5), 55-66 
  19. Kim, Y. S. and Lee, Y. M. (2020). Survival Analysis of Korean Home Pension : A Focus on Detailed Consumer Characteristics. Journal of KREAA, 26(4), 41-69.  https://doi.org/10.19172/KREAA.26.4.3
  20. Kitabo, C. A. and Kim, J. T. (2014). Survival Analysis of Bank Loan Repayment Rate for Customers of Hawassa Commercial Bank of Ethiopaia. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society, 25(6), 1591-1598.  https://doi.org/10.7465/JKDI.2014.25.6.1591
  21. Kwon, H. G. and Lee, M. B. (2018). A Study of Factors Influencing on the Intention to Use Internet Primary Bank. Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems, 23(1), 97-108. 
  22. Lawless, J. F. (1982). Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data, New York, Wiley. 
  23. Lee, C. J. (2023). Study on the Regulation of Financial Product Brokerage by Online Financial Platforms. The Law Reasearch Institutute of H ongik University, 24(1), 569-597. 
  24. Lee, D. G. (2019). Analysis and Implications of the Revenue Structure of Domestic Banks in South Korea. Weekly Financial Brief, 28(6), 8-9. 
  25. Lemeshow, S., May, S. and Hosmer Jr, D. W. (2011). Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-event Data, New York, John Wiley & Sons. 
  26. Narain, B. (1992). Survival Analysis and the Credit Granting Decision. In: Thomas, L. C., Crook, J. N. and Edelman, D. B. (Eds.), Credit Scoring and Credit Control, Oxford University Press, 109-122. 
  27. Noh, H. J., Roh, T. H. and Han, I. (2005). Prognostic Personal Credit Risk Model Considering Censored Information. Expert Systems with Applications, 28(4), 753-762.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2004.12.032
  28. Ok, H. M., Cho, M. S. and Chun, B. G. (2022). Analysis of Success Determinants of Movie Screening Market: Case of Seoul. Journal of Social Science, 48(3), 33-49.  https://doi.org/10.15820/KHJSS.2022.48.3.002
  29. Palli, S. R., Kamble, P. S., Chen, H. and Aparasu, R. R. (2012). Persistence of Stimulants in Children and Adolescents with Attention-deficit/hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 22(2), 139-148  https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2011.0028
  30. Shin, S. H. and Kim, Y. K. (2023). A Study on Container Terminal Layout and the Productivity of Container Crane During Ship Turnaround Time. Journal of Korea P ort Economic Association, 39(1), 47-63  https://doi.org/10.38121/kpea.2023.3.39.1.47
  31. Stepanova, M. and Thomas, L. (2002). Survival Analysis Methods for Personal Loan Data. Operations Research, 50(2), 277-289.  https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.50.2.277.426
  32. Sung, G. H. (2021). Save Even 0.1% on Interest Rates... Loan Comparison Platforms Gaining Popularity, https://cm.asiae.co.kr/article/2021112410413724717 (Accessed on Dec. 24th, 2021) 
  33. Yun, M. S. (2020). Financial Platform as a Sales Channel for Financial Instruments. Journal of Financial Consumers, 10(2), 5-25.  https://doi.org/10.30592/KAFC_JFC.10.02.01