Advances in nano research

  • 제16권4호
  • /
  • Pages.375-394
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2287-237X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-2388(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predicting the splitting tensile strength of manufactured-sand concrete containing stone nano-powder through advanced machine learning techniques

  • Manish Kewalramani (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Abu Dhabi University) ;
  • Hanan Samadi (IRO, Civil Engineering Department, University of Halabja) ;
  • Adil Hussein Mohammed (Department of Communication and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cihan University-Erbil) ;
  • Arsalan Mahmoodzadeh (IRO, Civil Engineering Department, University of Halabja) ;
  • Ibrahim Albaijan (Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering at Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University) ;
  • Hawkar Hashim Ibrahim (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Salahaddin University-Erbil) ;
  • Saleh Alsulamy (Department of Architecture and Planning, College of Engineering, King Khalid University)
  • 투고 : 2022.06.08
  • 심사 : 2024.03.07
  • 발행 : 2024.04.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The extensive utilization of concrete has given rise to environmental concerns, specifically concerning the depletion of river sand. To address this issue, waste deposits can provide manufactured-sand (MS) as a substitute for river sand. The objective of this study is to explore the application of machine learning techniques to facilitate the production of manufactured-sand concrete (MSC) containing stone nano-powder through estimating the splitting tensile strength (STS) containing compressive strength of cement (CSC), tensile strength of cement (TSC), curing age (CA), maximum size of the crushed stone (Dmax), stone nano-powder content (SNC), fineness modulus of sand (FMS), water to cement ratio (W/C), sand ratio (SR), and slump (S). To achieve this goal, a total of 310 data points, encompassing nine influential factors affecting the mechanical properties of MSC, are collected through laboratory tests. Subsequently, the gathered dataset is divided into two subsets, one for training and the other for testing; comprising 90% (280 samples) and 10% (30 samples) of the total data, respectively. By employing the generated dataset, novel models were developed for evaluating the STS of MSC in relation to the nine input features. The analysis results revealed significant correlations between the CSC and the curing age CA with STS. Moreover, when delving into sensitivity analysis using an empirical model, it becomes apparent that parameters such as the FMS and the W/C exert minimal influence on the STS. We employed various loss functions to gauge the effectiveness and precision of our methodologies. Impressively, the outcomes of our devised models exhibited commendable accuracy and reliability, with all models displaying an R-squared value surpassing 0.75 and loss function values approaching insignificance. To further refine the estimation of STS for engineering endeavors, we also developed a user-friendly graphical interface for our machine learning models. These proposed models present a practical alternative to laborious, expensive, and complex laboratory techniques, thereby simplifying the production of mortar specimens.

키워드

과제정보

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University (KKU) for funding this work through the Research Group Program Under the Grant. code RGP2/262/44.

참고문헌

  1. Chen, T. and Guestrin, C. (2016), "XGBoost", Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
  2. Chou, J.S. and Pham, A.D. (2013), "Enhanced artificial intelligence for ensemble approach to predicting high performance concrete compressive strength", Constr. Build. Mater., 49, 554-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.078
  3. Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V. (1995), "Support-vector networks", Mach. Learn., 20(3), 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
  4. Cover, T. and Hart, P. (1967), "Nearest neighbor pattern classification", IEEE T. Inform. Theor., 13(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964
  5. Dehestani, A., Kazemi, F., Abdi, R. and Nitka, M. (2022), "Prediction of fracture toughness in fibre-reinforced concrete, mortar, and rocks using various machine learning techniques. Eng. Fract. Mech., 276, 108914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108914
  6. Ding, X., Li, C., Xu, Y., Li, F. and Zhao, S. (2016), "Experimental study on long-term compressive strength of concrete with manufactured sand", Constr. Build. Mater., 108, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.028
  7. Ho, T.K. (1998), "The random subspace method for constructing decision forests", IEEE T. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 20(8), 832-844. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.709601
  8. Hou, S., Qiao, L. and Xing, L. (2022), "Artificial neural fuzzy system and monitoring the process via IoT for optimization synthesis of nano-size polymeric chains", Adv. Nano Res., 14(4), 375-386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2022.12.4.375
  9. Jin, R. and Agrawal, G. (2003), "Communication and Memory Efficient Parallel Decision Tree Construction", Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972733.11
  10. Kaloop, M. R., Kumar, D., Samui, P., Hu, J. W. and Kim, D. (2020), "Compressive strength prediction of high-performance concrete using gradient tree boosting machine", Constr. Build. Mater., 264, 120198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120198
  11. Kazemi, F., Asgarkhani, N. and Jankowski, R. (2023), "Machine learning-based seismic response and performance assessment of reinforced concrete buildings", Arch. Civil Mech. Eng., 23(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-023-00631-9
  12. Aretz, K., Bartram, S. M. and Pope, P. F. (2011), "Asymmetric loss functions and the rationality of expected stock returns", Int. J. Forecast., 27(2), 413-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.10.008
  13. Li, B., Ke, G. and Zhou, M. (2011), "Influence of manufactured sand characteristics on strength and abrasion resistance of pavement cement concrete", Constr. Build. Mater., 25(10), 3849-3853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.004
  14. Ling, H., Qian, C., Kang, W., Liang, C. and Chen, H. (2019), "Combination of Support Vector Machine and K-Fold cross validation to predict compressive strength of concrete in marine environment", Constr. Build. Mater., 206, 355-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.071
  15. Liu, Q., Peng, K., Zeng, J., Marzouki, R., Majdi, A., Jan, A., Salameh, A. A. and Assilzadeh, H. (2022), "Effects of mining activities on Nano-soil management using artificial intelligence models of ANN and ELM", Adv. Nano Res., 12(6), 549-566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2022.12.6.549
  16. Mamdani, M. (1974), "The ideology of population control. Concern. Demograph., 4(2), 13-22. PMID: 12307029.
  17. Moayedi, Kalantar, Foong, Tien Bui and Motevalli. (2019), "Application of three metaheuristic techniques in simulation of concrete slump", Appl. Sci., 9(20), 4340. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9204340
  18. Pan, J., Zhong, W., Wang, J. and Zhang, C. (2022), "Size effect on dynamic splitting tensile strength of concrete: Mesoscale modeling", Cement Concr. Compos., 128, 104435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104435
  19. Quinlan, J.R. (1986), "Induction of decision trees", Mach. Learn., 1(1), 81-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116251
  20. Rasmussen, C.E. (2004), "Gaussian processes in machine learning", Adv. Lecture. Mach. Learn., 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_4
  21. Ren, W., Wu, X. and Cai, R. (2022), "A hybrid artificial intelligence and IOT for investigation dynamic modeling of nano-system", Adv. Nano Res., 13(2), 165-174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2022.13.2.165
  22. Tinoco, J., Alberto, A., da Venda, P., Gomes Correia, A. and Lemos, L. (2020), "A novel approach based on soft computing techniques for unconfined compression strength prediction of soil cement mixtures'', Neural Comput. Appl., 32(13), 8985-8991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04399-z
  23. Walczak, S. and Cerpa, N. (2003), "Artificial neural networks", Encyclopedia Phys. Sci. Technol., 65(6), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00837-1
  24. Yaseen, Z.M., Deo, R C., Hilal, A., Abd, A.M., Bueno, L.C., Salcedo-Sanz, S. and Nehdi, M.L. (2018), "Predicting compressive strength of lightweight foamed concrete using extreme learning machine model", Adv. Eng. Softw., 115, 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.09.004
  25. Zhang, J., Li, D. and Wang, Y. (2020), "Predicting mechanical properties of manufactured-sand concrete using tree-based machine learning models", J. Clean. Prod., 258, 120665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120665
  26. Zhao, S., Ding, X., Zhao, M., Li, C. and Pei, S. (2017), "Experimental study on tensile strength development of concrete with manufactured sand", Constr. Build. Mater., 138, 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.093
  27. Zhou, X., Wang, P., Al-Dhaifallah, M., Rawa, M. and Khadimallah, M. A. (2022), "A machine learning-based model for the estimation of the critical thermo-electrical responses of the sandwich structure with magneto-electro-elastic face sheet", Adv. Nano Res., 12(1), 81-99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2022.12.1.081
  28. Zhou, X., Liu, X., Jiang, J., Gao, X. and Ji, X. (2021, July), "Asymmetric loss functions for learning with noisy labels", Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 12846-12856. PMLR. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.10.008