정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제41권1호
  • /
  • Pages.509-536
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국채보상운동 디지털 아카이브의 개인/단체명 관리를 위한 메타데이터 설계에 관한 연구

A Study on Metadata Design for Managing Person and Organization Names in the National Debt Redemption Movement Digital Archive

  • 한상은 (성균관대학교 사서교육원) ;
  • 도슬기 (한성대학교 크리에이티브인문학부)
  • 투고 : 2024.02.20
  • 심사 : 2024.03.12
  • 발행 : 2024.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 소규모의 디지털 아카이브인 국채보상운동 디지털 아카이브의 개인과 단체 전거데이터를 관리하기 위한 메타데이터 AP를 개발하는 것이다. 도서관과 기록관의 개인/단체 메타데이터 표준, 구축 사례 및 지침을 분석하여 설계 원칙과 핵심적인 메타데이터 요소를 도출하였으며, 국채보상운동 개인/단체명 시소러스 데이터, 위키데이터 연계 메타데이터 모델과 매핑하여 최종적으로 식별영역 10개 요소, 내용영역 14개 요소, 관계영역 8개 요소, 통제영역 4개 요소를 도출하였다. 소규모의 기관에서도 적용할 수 있도록 단순 구조 스키마를 적용하였고, 상호운용성을 위해 DublinCore, SKOS 스킴을 참고하여 스키마를 제안하였고 실제 데이터를 토대로 적용가능성을 확인하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 데이터 관리의 중요성은 알지만, 실제적인 적용이 어려운 기관에서 전거데이터 관리체계를 마련하고자 할 때, 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to develop a metadata AP for managing the person and organization name authority data in the National Debt Redemption Movement Digital Archive, a small-scale digital archive. The design principles and core metadata elements were derived by analyzing person/organization(group or corporateBody) metadata standards, implementation practices, and guidelines of libraries and archives, and mapped to the National Debt Redemption Movement person/organization name thesaurus data and the Wikidata Linked Metadata Model, resulting in 10 elements in the identification area, 14 elements in the content area, 8 elements in the relationship area, and 4 elements in the control area. A simple structure schema was applied so that it can be applied even in small organizations, and for interoperability, the schema was proposed with reference to DublinCore and SKOS schemes, and the applicability was confirmed based on actual data. The results of this study can be utilized as a basis for institutions that recognize the importance of data management but have difficulty in applying it in practice, when they want to prepare a system for managing their own authority data.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 2023년 국채보상운동 디지털 아카이브의 세계화를 위한 위키데이터 연계, 전거 및 학술네트워크 구축 사업의 연구비를 지원받아 수행되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Jung, Chang-Oh & Rieh, Hae-young (2018). Current status and features of the publication program in archives: Focusing on the US national archives and records administration and the national archives of Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 18(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2018.18.1.001
  2. Jung, In-Ok (2014). Case Study on the Development for Archival Authority Records in University Archives. Master's thesis, Hannam University.
  3. Kim, Ji Ah (2022). A study on classification & description of art archives: Focused on "The Art Archives, Seoul Museum of Art". The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 74, 79-117. http://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2022.74.079
  4. Kim, Soohyun & Lee, Sungsook (2020). A study on archive description using RiC-CM. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(1), 115-137. http://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.1.115
  5. Kim, Sung-Hee (2005). Establishing and exchanging contextual information based on the authority control of creators of archives. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 16(2), 61-88.
  6. Lee, Eun Yeong (2022). A research on the construction and sharing of authority record: Focusing on the case of social networks and archival context project. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 71, 49-89. http://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2022.71.049
  7. Lee, Hyewon (2013). The comparison and analysis of interoperability between archival authority and library authority. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 13(2), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.2.227
  8. Lee, Hyun-Jeong (2006). Analysis of authority control system in collecting pepository: From the case of Archival Management System in Korea Democracy Foundation. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 13, 91-134. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2006.13.091
  9. Lee, Mihwa (2017). A study on the considerations in constructing BIBFRAME by analyzing BIBFRAME 2.0. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(4), 107-127. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.4.201712.107
  10. Lee, Seok-Hyoung & Kwak, Seung-Jin (2011). A study on the FRAD conceptual model based authority data scheme for academic papers. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(3), 235-257. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.3.235
  11. National Archives of Korea (2009). Guide for Authority Recordof National Archives of Korea Version 1.0(NAK/A 12). National Archives of Korea.
  12. National Information Society Agency (2014). Guide to self-Assessing the Adequacy of De-Identification of Personal Information.
  13. National Library of Korea (2018). NLK guideline for name authorities(Publication Registration No: 11-1371029-000162-14). National Library of Korea.
  14. National Library of Korea (2022). BIBFRAME 2.0 Explanations(Publication Registration No: 11-1371029-000234-01). National Library of Korea.
  15. Oh, Samgyun, Park, Ok-Nam, & Won, Sun-Min (2008). Developing a methodology for designing metadata application profiles: Applied to Korea art and culture education service. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(4), 353-376. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.353
  16. Park, Jin-Hee (2007). Comparative analysis on the 1st edition and the revised of the international standard archival authority record for corporate bodies, personal and families. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(1), 341-361. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.1.200703.341
  17. Records and Archives Business Research, Digital Archiving Institute of Myongji University (2013). Academic Research Report for the Establishment of the Seoul Metropolitan Archives (Publication Registration No: 51-6110000-000703-01). Seoul.
  18. Seoul Metropolitan Archives (2017). 2017 Digital Archive Building Consultation Report for Seoul Metropolitan Archives(Publication Registration No: 51-6113815-000001-01).
  19. Shin, JeongA (2020). Building local digital archives: The case of "Gyeonggi-do Memory". Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(3), 161-166. http://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.3.161
  20. Suh, Hye-Ran (2005). Collaboration between libraries and archives for the preservation and use of documentary heritage. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 16(2), 25-41.
  21. The Commemorate the National Debt Redemption Movement (2022). Establish Data Standardization and Wikidata Linkage for the Globalization of the National Debt Redemptions Movement Digital Archive.
  22. The Commemorate the National Debt Redemption Movement (2023). Establish a Wikidata linkage, Person/Organization Authority, and Scholarly Network for the Globalization of the National Debt Redemptions Movement Digital Archive.
  23. Chan, L. M. & Zeng, M. L. (2006). Metadata interoperability and standardization: a study of methodology part1. D-Lib Magazine, 12(6).
  24. International Council on Archives (2004). ISAAR(CPF): International Standard Archival Authority Record for Corporate Bodies, Persons and Families, 2nd Edition. Available: https://www.ica.org/en/isaar-cpf-international-standard-archival-authority-record-corporate-bodies-persons-and-families-2nd
  25. Miller, E. & Ogbuji, U. (2012). BIBFRAME Primer - Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data: Linked Data Model and Supporting Services. Technical Report.
  26. Zeng, M. L. (2021). Enhancing the FAIRness of the (meta)data in the Korean. National Debt Redemption Movement Archive. 2021 국채보상운동 국제컨퍼런스 자료집.