DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학도서관 발전계획 분석 - 루브릭 평가를 중심으로 -

A Study on University Library Development Plan: Focused on Rubric Evaluation

  • 전선구 (부산대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이용재 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2024.02.26
  • 심사 : 2024.03.20
  • 발행 : 2024.03.30

초록

본 연구의 목적은 국내 대학도서관 발전계획을 분석하여 핵심 구성요소를 반영하고 있는지 점검하고 대학도서관발전계획 수립에 대한 개선방안을 모색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 외국 대학 및 도서관 평가 관련 연구를 통해 도출된 루브릭(Rubric) 평가기법을 활용하였다. 연구 대상은 QS 세계대학평가 및 THE 세계대학평가를 참고하여 국내 상위 15개 대학의 도서관을 선정하고, 발전계획의 핵심 구성요소를 얼마나 반영하고 있는지 평가하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 대학도서관 발전계획을 평가한 결과, 구성요소 중 '목적', '목표', '실행계획'의 내용을 대부분 반영하고 있었으나 '사명', '비전'에 취약점이 나타났다. 둘째, 일부 사립대학 도서관은 핵심 구성요소를 모두 포함하여 선진국 수준의 전략적 계획 차원으로 나아가고 있었다. 셋째, '목적'을 대부분의 대학도서관에서 명시하고 있었지만, 형식적인 기술과 연계성으로 한계를 보였다. 종합적인 평가에서는 최고점 15점 중 양호 12곳, 미흡 3곳으로 국내 대학도서관들의 발전계획은 대체로 '양호'한 수준으로 나타났다. 이에 대한 개선방안으로 '발전계획 수립을 위한 테스크포스 구성', '발전계획 공개 및 홍보', '사서 대상 발전계획 교육 강화'를 제언하였다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze domestic academic library development plans, check whether key components are reflected, and seek ways to improve the establishment of academic library development plans. To this end, a rubric evaluation technique derived from research related to evaluation of foreign universities and libraries was used. The libraries of the top 15 domestic universities were selected by referring to the QS World University Evaluation and THE World University Evaluation as the subjects of the study, and how much the core components of the development plan were reflected were evaluated. The results of the study are as follows. First, as a result of evaluating the university library development plan, most of the contents of 'purpose', 'goal', and 'action plan' were reflected, but vulnerabilities were found in 'mission' and 'vision'. Second, some private academic libraries were moving toward strategic planning at the level of advanced countries, including all of the core components. Third, although most academic libraries specified 'purpose', it showed limitations due to perfunctory description and connection. In the comprehensive evaluation, out of the highest score of 15, 12 were good and 3 were poor, indicating that the development plans of domestic academic libraries were generally at a 'good' level. As an improvement measure, it was suggested to form a task force for development plan establishment, to disclose and promote development plans, and to strengthen education on development plans for librarians.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chang, Durk-Hyun (2019). Perceived effects and tasks of library strategic plans of universities in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(4), 213-230. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.4.213
  2. Choi, Ye-Jin, Kim, Chohae & Lee, Jee-Yeon (2023). Trend analysis of foreign academic libraries'development plan. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 40(3), 163-196. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2023.40.3.163
  3. Kim, Nam-Suk, Kim, Seon-mi, Gim, Seung-hwan, Suh, Su-hwan, You, Wansik, & Jeong, Hye-mi (2013). Presentation on strategic planning model to strengthen academic library's management competency. Journal of Korean Association of Private University Libraries, 43, 1-33.
  4. Lee, Jae-Won (2019). A study of policy and agenda adoption trends of university library in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(3), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.3.083
  5. Lee, Yong-Jae (2015). A study on the evaluation of strategic plan of academic libraries: focused on the cases of national university libraries in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(4), 551-574. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.46.4.201512.551
  6. Lee, Yong-Jae (2017). A comparative study on development plans and strategic plans of academic libraries in Korea and overseas. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(11), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.11.61
  7. Lee, Yong-Jae (2021). Library Management Strategy and Marketing. Seoul: CRbooks. 
  8. Lee, Yong-Jae, Jeon, Sun-Gu, & Jeong, Jin-Gyeong (2023). A study on librarians' perception about the current status and establishment of academic library development plan. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for Library and Information Science, 34(4), 331-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2023.34.4.331
  9. Rinfo (2024, January 28.). Academic information statistics system. Available: http://www.rinfo.kr/
  10. University Library Act. No. 18547.
  11. University Library Promotion Act No. 18547.
  12. Yang, Hee-Mo & Hwang, Seon-Young (2014). Development of clinical scenarios and rubrics for a program outcome-based evaluation for students' adult health nursing practice. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 26(6), 653-667. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.6.653
  13. Brown, W. A. & Gonzalez, B. A. B. (2007). Academic libraries: should strategic panning be renewed?. Technical Services Quarterly, 24(3), 1-14.
  14. Buchanan, S. & Cousins, F. (2012). Evaluating the strategic plans of public libraries: an inspection-based approach. Library & Information Science Research, 34, 125-130.
  15. Chance, S. & Williams, B. T. (2009). Assessing university strategic plans: a tool for consideration. Educational Planning, 18(1), 38-54.
  16. Pacios, A. R. (2004). Strategic plans and long-range plans: is there a difference?. Library Management, 25(6/7), 259-269.
  17. Redd, R. T., Sims, A., & Weekes, T. (2020). Framework for change: creating a diversity strategic plan within an academic library. Journal of Library Administration, 60(3), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1698920
  18. Sanches, T. (2018). Shrink to fit or prune to strengthen: adapting the strategic plan in an academic library as response to environmental change. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(3-4), 310-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2018.1501714
  19. Saunders, L. (2016). Room for improvement: priorities in academic libraries' strategic plans. Journal of Library Administration, 56(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1105029
  20. Walter, S. (2018). Communicating value through strategic engagement: promoting awareness of the "value of libraries" through alignment across academic, student, and administrative affairs. Library Management, 39(3/4), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-09-2017-0093