Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

  • 제24권2호
  • /
  • Pages.119-128
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2383-9309(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-9317(eISSN)
대한치과마취과학회 (The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparative evaluation of peppermint oil and lignocaine spray as topical anesthetic agents prior to local anesthesia in children: a randomized clinical trial

  • Harika Petluru (Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital) ;
  • SVSG Nirmala (Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital) ;
  • Sivakumar Nuvvula (Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.17
  • 심사 : 2024.03.22
  • 발행 : 2024.04.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: In pediatric dentistry, fear and anxiety are common among children. Local anesthetics (LA) are widely used to control pain and reduce discomfort in children during dental treatment. Topical anesthetics play a vital role in reducing pain and the unpleasant sensation of a needle puncture in children. Peppermint oil has been extensively used for various diseases. However, its anesthetic properties remain unknown. Peppermint oil, used in mouthwashes, toothpastes, and other topical preparations has analgesic, anesthetic, and antiseptic properties. This study aimed to compare and evaluate pain perception following the topical application of peppermint oil versus lignocaine spray before an intraoral injection in children, aged 8-13 years. Method: Fifty-two children, aged between 8-13 years, who required local anesthesia for dental treatment were divided into two groups of 26 each by simple random sampling (Group 1: 0.2% peppermint oil and Group 2: lignocaine spray). In both groups, physiological measurements (e.g., heart rate) were recorded using pulse oximetry before, during, and after the procedure. Objective pain measurement (Sound Eye Motor (SEM) scale) during administration and subjective measuremeant (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS)) after LA administration were recorded. This was followed by the required treatment of the child. Physiological parameters were compared between the two groups using an independent t-test for intergroup assessment and a paired t-test and repeated-measures ANOVA for intragroup comparisons. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the pain scores. Results: Intragroup mean heart rates, before, during, and after treatment were statistically significantly different (P < 0.05). However, the intergroup mean pulse rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. The mean WBFPS score in the lignocaine spray group was 4.133 ± 2.06 was statistically different from that of the peppermint oil group (0.933 ± 1.03; P < 0.001*). The mean SEM score was significantly lower in the peppermint oil group than that in the lignocaine spray group (P = 0.006). No negative effects were observed in this study. Conclusion: 0.2% peppermint oil was effective in reducing pain perception.

키워드

과제정보

The authors thank Dr. Salma Shaik, M. Pharm, and Associate Professor at the Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Narayana Pharmacy College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.

참고문헌

  1. Gao X, Hamzah SH, Yiu CK, mcgrath C, King NM. Dental fear and anxiety in children and adolescents: qualitative study using youtube. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e29.
  2. Kaufman E, Epstein JB, Naveh E, Gorsky M, Gross A, Cohen G. A survey of pain, pressure, and discomfort induced by commonly used oral local anesthesia injections. Anesth Prog 2005; 52: 122-7
  3. Meechan JG. Effective topical anesthetic agents and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: 759-66.
  4. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 5th ed. St. Louis, Mosby. 2004, pp 119-121.
  5. Ogle OE, Mahjoubi G. Local anesthesia: agents, techniques, and complications. Dent Clin North Am 2012; 56: 133-48.
  6. Martin MD, Ramsey DS, Whitney C, Fiset L, Weinstein P. Topical anesthesia: differentiating the pharmacological and psychological contributions to efficacy. Anesth Prog 1994; 41: 40-7.
  7. Torp KD, Metheny E, Simon LV. Lidocaine Toxicity. [Updated 2022 Dec 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482479/
  8. Hindocha N, Manhem F, Backryd E, Bagesund M. Ice versus lidocaine 5% gel for topical anaesthesia of oral mucosa - a randomized cross-over study. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19: 227.
  9. Tsuchiya H. Anesthetic agents of plant origin: a review of phytochemicals with anesthetic activity. Molecules 2017; 22: 1369.
  10. Herro E, Jacob SE. Mentha piperita (peppermint). Dermatitis 2010; 21: 327-9.
  11. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 2010; 8: 18
  12. Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs 1988; 14: 9-17.
  13. Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O. The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Pediatr Dent 1991; 13: 278-83.
  14. Frankl S, Shiere F, Fogels H. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child 1962; 29: 150-63.
  15. Sharma A, Suprabha BS, Shenoy R, Rao A. Efficacy of lignocaine in gel and spray form during buccal infiltration anesthesia in children: a randomized clinical trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15: 750-4.
  16. Al-Omari WM, Al-Omiri MK. Dental anxiety among university students and its correlation with their field of study. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17: 199-203.
  17. Priyatham S, Nuvvula S. Intraoral topical anaesthesia in pediatric dentistry: Review. Int J Pharma Bio Sci 2016; 7: 346-53.
  18. Tirupathi S, Gopalakrishnan D, Deshkar S. Herbal topical anesthetics in dentistry: an exploratory review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2022; 22: 419-26.
  19. Amado A, Sood A, Taylor JS. Contact allergy to lidocaine: a report of sixteen cases. Dermatitis 2007; 18: 215-20.
  20. Yaman Z, Kisnisci RS. Idiopathic swelling of the lower lip associated with topical anaesthesia. Report of three cases. Aust Dent J 1998; 43: 324-7.
  21. Kumar DM. Management of anaphylaxis in dental office an update. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2015; 6: 401-7.
  22. Mohite V, Baliga S, Thosar N, Rathi N. Role of dexmedetomidine in pediatric dental sedation. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2019; 19: 83-90.
  23. Shabbir N, Hassan SM, Mughal SS, Perveiz S, Munir M, Mushtaq M, et al. Peppermint oil, its useful, and adverse effects on human health: a review. Innovare J Ay Sci 2020; 8: 1-4.
  24. Quick reference table - Cosmetic Ingredient Review reports through June 2010. Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Safety. 2010. Available from http://www.cir-safety.org/staff_files/publicationslistdec2009.Pdf (accessed August 27,
  25. Marek E, Kraft WK. Ethanol pharmacokinetics in neonates and infants. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2014; 76: 90-7.
  26. Peppermint: University of Maryland Medical Center. 2010. Available from http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/peppermint-000269.htm (accessed August 27, 2010).
  27. Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics 2010; 126: e1168-98.
  28. Champion GD, Goodenough B, CL von Baeyer, Thomas W. Measurement of pain by self-report. Prog Pain Res Manag 1998; 10: 123-60.
  29. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 307-11.
  30. Mohite VA, Baliga S, Thosar N, Rathi N, Khobragade P, Srivastava R. Comparative evaluation of a novel herbal anesthetic gel and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children: bilateral split-mouth, single-blind, crossover in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2020; 38: 177-83.
  31. De Andrade LC, Rotta IW, Chaves SR, Uchida DT, Gazim ZC, Ferreira FB, et al. Effectiveness of acmella oleracea for topical anesthesia on buccal mucosa. Rev Odonto Cienc 2013; 28: 61-5.
  32. Havale R, Rao DG, S P S, M Tuppadmath K, Tharay N, Mathew I, et al. Comparative evaluation of pain perception following topical application of clove oil, betel leaf extract, lignocaine gel, and ice prior to intraoral injection in children aged 6-10 years: a randomized control study. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2021; 21: 329-36.
  33. Anantharaj A, Sabu JM, Ramakrishna S, Jagdeesh RB, Praveen P, Shankarappa PR. A comparative evaluation of pain perception following topical application of benzocaine gel, clove-papaya based anesthetic gel and precooling of the injection site before intraoral injections in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2020; 38: 184-9.
  34. Pathan JM, Dadpe MV, Kale YJ, Dahake PT, Kendre SB. Evaluation of lavender oil as a topical analgesic agent before dental anaesthesia through pain rating scales-an in vivo study. J Dent Med Sci 2020; 19: 6-13.
  35. Mandal P, Gupta S, Patel S, Tripathi P, Patra A. Preferred topical anesthesia in reducing injection pain: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Sci Stud 2022; 10: 100-6.
  36. Youssef ER, Barakat IF, Abbas AN. A comparative evaluation of pain perception following application of eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (emla) and clove gel before intraoral injection in children. Al-Azhar J Dent Dent Sci 2023; 26: 547-53.
  37. Galeotti N, Ghelardini C, Mannelli L, Mazzanti G, Baghiroli L, Bartolini A. Local anaesthetic activity of (+)-and (-)-menthol. Planta Med 2001; 67: 174-6.