Journal of Trauma and Injury

The Korean Society of Traumatology (대한외상학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Radiologic assessment of the optimal point for tube thoracostomy using the sternum as a landmark: a computed tomography-based analysis

  • Jaeik Jang (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Jae-Hyug Woo (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Mina Lee (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Woo Sung Choi (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Yong Su Lim (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Jin Seong Cho (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Jae Ho Jang (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Jea Yeon Choi (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Sung Youl Hyun (Gachon University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2023.08.31
  • Accepted : 2023.10.18
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed at developing a novel tube thoracostomy technique using the sternum, a fixed anatomical structure, as an indicator to reduce the possibility of incorrect chest tube positioning and complications in patients with chest trauma. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the data of 184 patients with chest trauma who were aged ≥18 years, visited a single regional trauma center in Korea between April and June 2022, and underwent chest computed tomography (CT) with their arms down. The conventional gold standard, 5th intercostal space (ICS) method, was compared to the lower 1/2, 1/3, and 1/4 of the sternum method by analyzing CT images. Results: When virtual tube thoracostomy routes were drawn at the mid-axillary line at the 5th ICS level, 150 patients (81.5%) on the right side and 179 patients (97.3%) on the left did not pass the diaphragm. However, at the lower 1/2 of the sternum level, 171 patients (92.9%, P<0.001) on the right and 182 patients (98.9%, P= 0.250) on the left did not pass the diaphragm. At the 5th ICS level, 129 patients (70.1%) on the right and 156 patients (84.8%) on the left were located in the safety zone and did not pass the diaphragm. Alternatively, at the lower 1/2, 1/3, and 1/4 of the sternum level, 139 (75.5%, P=0.185), 49 (26.6%, P<0.001), and 10 (5.4%, P<0.001), respectively, on the right, and 146 (79.3%, P=0.041), 69 (37.5%, P<0.001), and 16 (8.7%, P<0.001) on the left were located in the safety zone and did not pass the diaphragm. Compared to the conventional 5th ICS method, the sternum 1/2 method had a safety zone prediction sensitivity of 90.0% to 90.7%, and 97.3% to 100% sensitivity for not passing the diaphragm. Conclusions: Using the sternum length as a tube thoracostomy indicator might be feasible.

Keywords

References

  1. Jayathissa S, Dee S. How safe is the 'safe triangle'. N Z Med J 2011;124:79-83.
  2. Kesieme EB, Dongo A, Ezemba N, Irekpita E, Jebbin N, Kesieme C. Tube thoracostomy: complications and its management. Pulm Med 2012;2012:256878.
  3. Griffiths JR, Roberts N. Do junior doctors know where to insert chest drains safely? Postgrad Med J 2005;81:456-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2004.024752
  4. Elsayed H, Roberts R, Emadi M, Whittle I, Shackcloth M. Chest drain insertion is not a harmless procedure: are we doing it safely? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;11:745-8. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2010.243196
  5. Kwiatt M, Tarbox A, Seamon MJ, et al. Thoracostomy tubes: a comprehensive review of complications and related topics. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2014;4:143-55. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.134182
  6. American College of Surgeons. ATLS Advanced Trauma Life Support: student course manual. 10th ed. American College of Surgeons; 2018.
  7. O'Keeffe F, Surendran N, Yazbek C, et al. Surface anatomy site for thoracostomy using the axillary hairline. Trauma 2020;22:251-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460408619875375
  8. Bing F, Fitzgerald M, Olaussen A, et al. Identifying a safe site for intercostal catheter insertion using the mid-arm point (MAP). J Emerg Med Trauma Acute Care 2017;2017:3.
  9. Shin J, Rhee JE, Kim K. Is the inter-nipple line the correct hand position for effective chest compression in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Resuscitation 2007;75:305-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.05.003
  10. Lee KH, Kim EY, Park DH, et al. Evaluation of the 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for infant CPR finger/thumb positions for chest compression: a study using computed tomography. Resuscitation 2013;84:766-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.005
  11. Sayeed RA, Darling GE. Surface anatomy and surface landmarks for thoracic surgery. Thorac Surg Clin 2007;17:449-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.12.002
  12. Linnebur M, Inaba K, Haltmeier T, et al. Emergent non-image-guided resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) catheter placement: a cadaver-based study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016;81:453-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001106
  13. Jang M, Lee M, Lee G, Lee J, Choi K, Yu B. Changes in injury pattern and outcomes owf trauma patients after COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study. Healthcare (Basel) 2023;11:1074.
  14. Jeong YH, Oh JW, Cho S; Korean Trauma Data Bank System Committee. Clinical outcome of acute epidural hematoma in Korea: preliminary report of 285 cases registered in the Korean Trauma Data Bank System. Korean J Neurotrauma 2016;12:47-54. https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2016.12.2.47
  15. Wax DB, Leibowitz AB. Radiologic assessment of potential sites for needle decompression of a tension pneumothorax. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1385-8. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000282827.86345.ff
  16. Oner Z, Oner S, Kurtul I, Sahin B. Usage length of sternum components and sternal angle through images obtained by computerized tomography image reconstruction in gender determination. Ann Med Res 2019;26:217-21.
  17. Ekizoglu O, Hocaoglu E, Inci E, et al. Sex estimation from sternal measurements using multidetector computed tomography. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014;93:e240.
  18. Akoglu H, Akoglu EU, Evman S, et al. Determination of the appropriate catheter length and place for needle thoracostomy by using computed tomography scans of pneumothorax patients. Injury 2013;44:1177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.005
  19. Laan DV, Vu TD, Thiels CA, et al. Chest wall thickness and decompression failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anatomic locations in needle thoracostomy. Injury 2016;47:797-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.045
  20. Harcke HT, Pearse LA, Levy AD, Getz JM, Robinson SR. Chest wall thickness in military personnel: implications for needle thoracentesis in tension pneumothorax. Mil Med 2007;172:1260-3. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.172.12.1260
  21. Inaba K, Branco BC, Eckstein M, et al. Optimal positioning for emergent needle thoracostomy: a cadaver-based study. J Trauma 2011;71:1099-103. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31822d9618