한국중재학회지:중재연구 (Journal of Arbitration Studies)

한국중재학회 (The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공서양속에 반하는 중재판결: 경제제재에 대한 분석을 중심으로

Arbitration awards against public policy; in regards to economic sanctions

  • 한수민 (고려대학교 법학전문대학원) ;
  • 김진비 (이화여자대학교 법학전문대학원) ;
  • 이재혁 (한미사이언스)
  • 투고 : 2024.02.02
  • 심사 : 2024.02.23
  • 발행 : 2024.03.02
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper examines issues concerning conflicts between arbitral awards and public interests, particularly with respect to economic sanctions. Sanctions have been widely used by political entities, such as States and organizations, as means to promote public interests and to resolve cross-border disputes. In particular, economic sanctions have been increasingly more visible in recent years due to the accelerating fragmentation of the international communities, and their magnitude and range of the impacts have grown accordingly. For example, the U.S. and the EU have imposed economic sanctions on Russia and related persons in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The U.S. recently re-introduced a comprehensive economic sanction on Iran. One of the notable impacts of the sanctions, particularly economic sanctions, is that on international arbitration. Sanctions are essentially built on the notion of the protection of public interests, and public interests are some of the few grounds upon which recognition and enforceability or arbitral awards may be rejected. However, jurisprudence on such conflict between sanctions and arbitral awards have not been sufficiently addressed in Korea because court case and administrative decision records on this conflict have not been sufficiently accumulated. In this regard, this paper begins with offering a survey of the concept of public interests, economic and trade sanctions, arbitral awards and their enforceability, and the relationships between them. It then examines the mechanism upon which public interests, trade and economic sanctions may lead certain arbitral awards unenforceable. Next, the paper suggests judiciaries' balanced approach toward the public interests protected by trade and economic sanctions and the predictability and fairness in the enforcement of arbitral awards. Finally, this paper concludes with the methods of the implementation of such balanced approach.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김규진, "국제계약분쟁과 일방적 경제제재 - 이른바 'Legal Norm 접근법'에 대한 비판적 고찰을 중심으로", 법학연구 제32권 제3호 (2022. 9.)
  2. 김규진, "국제물품매매계약 상 채무불이행 책임 면제 사유로서의 경제제재-외국판례를 중심으로", 기업법연구 제36권 제1호 (2022. 3.)
  3. 김지이나 외 공저, "국제사회의 대러시아 제재에 따른 한국 정부의 조치", 법률신문, https://www.lawtimes.co.kr/news/177091 (2022. 3. 11.)
  4. 대법원 2010. 4. 8. 선고 2009두17018 판결
  5. 대법원 2009. 9. 10. 선고 2007두20638 판결
  6. 대법원 2018. 12. 13. 선고 2016다49931 판결
  7. 이동은, "강제노동 상품에 대한 수입통제의 국제법적 타당성 및 함의 - 제3국의 대응조치에 관한 논의를 중심으로", 국제법연구 제20권 제1호 (2022. 3. 31.)
  8. 이동은, "일방적 경제제재 조치의 국제법적 타당성 및 대북제재 관련 시사점", 국제법학회논총 제65권 제2호 (2020. 5.)
  9. 윤진수, "공서양속에 대한 총괄보고 (General Report)", 민사법학 제85호 (2018. 12.)
  10. 외교부 보도자료, "우리 정부의 대북 독자제재 지정", 외교부 한반도평화교섭본부 북핵정책과, 기획재정부 국제금융국 외환제도과, 금융위원회 금융정보분석원 기획행정실(2023. 7. 14.)
  11. 외교부 유엔과, "안보리 제재 (sanction)", 외교부, https://www.mofa.go.kr/www/brd/m_3874/view.do?seq=305876&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&multi_itm_seq=0&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&page=41 (2007. 11. 5.)
  12. 육영춘(Ying-Chun Lu);하충룡(Choong-Lyong Ha);한나희(Na-Hee Han). "외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행거부와 관련한 중국법원의 사례연구." 중재연구 30, 2호(2020): 69-90, 10.16998/jas.2020.30.2.69.
  13. 전략물자관리원, "국제제재 개요", KOSTI 국가별 제재현황, https://sanction.kosti.or.kr/user/nd7419.do (2023. 7. 23. 확인)
  14. 전략물자관리원, "제제란?", KOSTI 국가별 제재현황, https://sanction.kosti.or.kr/user/nd7419.do (2023. 7. 25. 확인)
  15. 전략물자관리원, "제재안내 범위", KOSTI 국가별 제재현황, https://sanction.kosti.or.kr/user/nd7419.do (2023. 7. 23. 확인)
  16. 한국무역협회, "러시아 수출금지 품목 확대, 5만달러 넘는 자동차, 기계 포함", https://www.kita.net/cmmrcInfo/cmmrcNews/cmmrcNews/cmmrcNewsDetail.do;JSESSIONID_KITA=742E9BCAD24A5A6EEE09A10BE566B510.Hyper?pageIndex=1&nIndex=73396&sSiteid=1 (2023. 7. 20. 확인)
  17. 한국일보, "러시아 '동결자산'에 붙은 이자만 1조 원..."우크라 지원" EU의큰그림?", 네이버뉴스, https://m.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2023052514210003560 (2023. 7. 29. 확인)
  18. SBS, "美, 이라크 내 이란 자산 동결 푼다...국내 묶인 70억달러는?", 네이버뉴스, https://biz.sbs.co.kr/article/20000121935 (2023. 7. 29. 확인)
  19. Ahan Gadkari, "EU Interference in Arbitration: Special Emphasis On the Effect of Unilaterla Sanctions", J. 3 Int'l Law & Com, 61, 68 (2022)
  20. Air France v. Libyan Airlines, Cour d'appel du Quebec, [2003] FC 35834
  21. Argus, "ConocoPhilips steps up global push to collect PdV debt", https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news/
  22. Beibei Zhang, Wei Shen, "When International Commercial Arbitration meets China's sanction laws: livign together but remaining apart?", Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2022)
  23. Eric De Brabandere and David Holloway, Research Handbook on Sanctions and International Arbitration, Leiden: Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies (2016)
  24. Hamish Lal, Brendan Casey, "Eu, Uk & Us "Sanctions': Procedural and Substantive Impact on International Arbitration?", Disp. Resol. Int'l 109, 119-20 (2022)
  25. JusMundi, "New York Convention: Public Policy Exception", Jansen Denise, https://jusmundi.com/en/document/publication/en-new-york-convention-public-policy-exception (2003. 5. 16.)
  26. JusMundi, "Sovereign Immunity from Execution (in Enforcement)", Ugale Anastasiya, https://jusmundi.com/en/document/publication/en-sovereign-inmunity-from-execution-in-enforcement (2023. 7. 29. 확인)
  27. KOTELNIKOV, "Economic sanctions, arbitrability and public policy", International arbitration law review (2020)
  28. Liliia Andreevskikh (Liliia Andreevskikh); 박은옥 (Eun-ok Park). "Public Policy Exception under Russian Law as a Ground for Refusing Recognition and Enforcement of Foreig Arbitral Awards." 중재연구 32권 제3호 (2022): 47-70, 10.16998/jas.2022.32.3.47.
  29. Michael P. Malloy, "Economic Sanctions and Retention of Counsel", 9 Admin. L.J. Am. U. 515, 542-44 (1995)
  30. New York Convention (Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards)
  31. OFFICE OF TERRORISM AND FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE, "FAQs - Venezuela Sanctions", https://ofac.treasury.gov/faqs/1123 (2023. 7. 29. 8:00)
  32. Parsons&Whittemore Overseas Co v. Societe General de I'industrie du Papier (RAKTA), 508F2d 969, 977 (2d Cir 1974)
  33. Petra Butler, "Kastom: A Public Policy Excpetion Under the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards", Indian Journal of Arbitration Law Vol 7(1) (2018)
  34. Reinmar Wolff, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Aribtral Awards of 10 June 1958 - Article-by-Article Commentary (2nd ed.), Munchen: Beck, Hart and Nomos (2012)
  35. "Report of the Security Council for 2022", United Nations, UN 문서 A/77/2, 2022 Supp. No. 2.
  36. Richard A. Cole, "The Public Policy Exception to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards", Journal on Dispute Resolution Vol 1(2) (n.d.)
  37. Samantha Nataf. "The French approach to enforcement of arbitral awards, international public policy and corruption." 중재연구 제33권 제3호 (2023, 9): 31-68, 10.16998/jas.2023.33.3.31.
  38. Teynier Pic, "Enforcement of arbitral awards against States under Sanctions: a new challenge", https://www.teynier.fr/en/enforcement-of-arbitral-awards-against-states-under-sanctions-a-new-challenge/ (2023. 7. 29. 확인)
  39. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
  40. United Nations Security Council, "Sanctions", https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/information (2023. 7. 21. 확인)
  41. U.S. Government Accountability Office, "Agencies Assess Impacts on Targets, and Studies Suggest Several Factors Contribute to Sanctions' Effectiveness", United States Government Accountability Office (2019. 10.)
  42. Venezuelanalysis, "Venezuela: CITGO Breakup Looms with Protection End in Sight", https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/15687 (2023. 7. 29. 확인)
  43. Vera Gowlland-Debbas, National Implementation of United Nations Sanctions: A Comparative Study, Martinus Nijhoff (2004)