DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Productivity and Efficiency Comparative Analysis of Container Terminal

국내 항만배후단지 효율성 및 생산성 비교 분석

  • Min-Seop Sim (Department of Convergence Interdisciplinary Education, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Do-Yeon Ha (KMI-KMOU Cooperation Course, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Yul-Seong Kim (Logistics System Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • 심민섭 (국립한국해양대학교 해양콘텐츠융복합협동과정 물류시스템전공) ;
  • 하도연 (국립한국해양대학교 KMI-KMOU 학연협동과정) ;
  • 김율성 (국립한국해양대학교 물류시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2023.11.13
  • Accepted : 2024.01.22
  • Published : 2024.02.29

Abstract

Port distripark can activate more functions. It is adjacent to a port. However, domestic port distripark is still limited to support port because of the shortage of infrastructure facilities, government policy, and investment. Therefore, this study tried to investigate the operation status of domestic port distripark and derive policy implications by conducting DEA analysis and productivity analysis based on internal data of each port distripark. As a result of Data Envelopment analysis, it was found that the west port distripark of Gwangwang and the northern port distripark of Incheon were efficient in the warehouse industry while the northern port distripark of Incheon and the Ulsan 1 port distripark were efficient in the manufacturing industry. In addition, in the case of foreign investment productivity, the west side port distripark of Gwangyang and the stage 1 port distripark of Pyeongtaek Dangjin were found to be higher than the others. In the case of facility investment productivity, the port distripark on the west side of Gwangyang and the north side of Incheon had the highest productivity. Lastly, in the case of labor productivity, the north side of Incheon and Busan ungdong port distripark showed the highest productivity. These results imply that it is important to review handling item when picking up enterprises in the port distripark for enhancing efficiency, foreign investment, and facility investment. The number of employees is not directly affecting the productivity improvement.

항만배후단지는 항만과 인접한 배후공간으로 항만의 기능이 더욱 활성화될 수 있도록 지원한다. 하지만, 국내 항만배후단지는 단순한 항만물류지원기능에 국한되어 있으며 인프라 시설, 정책 및 지원, 투자 미흡 등으로 인하여 항만배후단지 활성화에 어려움을 겪고 있다. 이에 본 논문은 국내 항만배후단지 업체별 내부자료를 바탕으로 DEA 분석 및 생산성 분석을 진행하여 국내 항만배후단지의 종합적인 정책 방향을 도출하고자 하였다. DEA 분석결과 창고업의 경우 광양항 서측, 인천항 북항 항만배후단지가 효율적인 것으로 나타났으며, 제조업의 경우 인천항 북항, 울산항 1공구 항만배후단지가 효율적으로 나타났다. 또한, 외국인 투자규모별 생산성의 경우 광양항 서측, 평택당진항 1단계 항만배후단지가 높게 나타났으며, 시설 투자규모별 생산성은 광양항 서측, 인천항 북항 항만배후단지가 높은 생산성을 보였다. 마지막으로, 노동생산성은 인천항 북항, 부산항 웅동 항만배후단지가 가장 높은 생산성을 보였다. 이러한 결과는 항만배후단지 입주기업 선정 시 취급 품목이 효율성에 중요한 영향을 주며, 외국인 투자규모, 시설 투자규모, 종업원 수가 항만배후단지의 생산성 향상으로 직결되고 있지 않은 상황을 나타낸다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2023학년도 국립한국해양대학교 BK21 FOUR 대학원혁신지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임.

References

  1. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E.(1978), "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units", European journal of operational research, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-444.
  2. Chung, T. W.(2020), "Support plan for tenant companies to revitalize the Pyeongtaek Port hinterland", Journal of The Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 419-436.
  3. Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., and Shale, E. A.(2001), "Pitfalls and protocols in DEA", European Journal of operational research, Vol. 132, No. 2, pp. 245-259.
  4. Golany, B. and Roll, Y.(1989), "An application procedure for DEA", Omega, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 237-250.
  5. Homburg, C.(2001), "Using data envelopment analysis to benchmark activities", International journal of production economics, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 51-58.
  6. Kim, S. C. and Kang, H. W.(2020), "A Study on the Performance Evaluation and Revitalization of Korea Port Distripark", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 137-154.
  7. Kim, S. G. and Choi, Y. S.(2013), "A Study on the Measuring Performance of Port Hinterlands in SCM's Perspective", The Journal of Shipping & Logistics, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 553-574.
  8. Kim, S. H. and Shin, G. H.(2014), "Location Selection Factors for International Distribution Center in Port Hinterland-A Review of Busan New Port Hinterland from User's Perspective", THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW, Vol. 64, pp. 187-210.
  9. Kim, Y. W., Cha, J. W. and Kim, Y. S.(2020), "AComparative Study on the Productivity by Characteristics of Tenant Companies in Busan NewPort Distripark", Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 509-516.
  10. Lee, S. W., YI, H. and Song, J. M.(2013), "A Study on Improving Competitiveness of Port Logistics Parks in South Korea", Journal of The Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 29, pp. 803-825.
  11. Park, G. Y. and Ha, M. S.(2015B), "A Study on the Analysis of Efficiency of Logistic Center in Port Hinterland of Busan New Port - based on Data Envelopment Analysis", Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 169-190.
  12. Park, G. Y. and Ha, M. S.(2015A), "Enhancing Competitiveness of the North Container Hinterland of Busan New Port-Based on AHP method", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 75-91.
  13. Park, G. C.(2020), "A study on the Policy Evaluation and Promotion Scheme for Korean port hinterland", Chung-Ang University, Graduate school of International Trade, PhD Dissertation.
  14. Park, H. G.(2011), "The Efficiency of the Port Hinterlands of Gwangyang and Busan", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol 27, No. 1, pp. 13-30.
  15. Park, J. M., Jeon, J. W. and Yeo, G. T.(2015), "A Study on Efficiency of Resident Logistics Companies in Port Hinterland Using Super-SBM", Journal of navigation and port research, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 507-514.
  16. Qing, C. L. and Na, J. M.(2013), "A Study on Efficiency and Determinants of Port Hinterlands Competitiveness in Gwangyang: Focus on Moved-in Companies", Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 57-78.
  17. Qing, C. L. and Na, J. M.(2013), "Efficiency Analysis of Major Port Hinterlands of China-Korea using DEA and Tier Models", Journal of the International Association of Area Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 73-96.