Journal of Nutrition and Health

  • 제57권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-15
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2288-3886(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3959(eISSN)
한국영양학회 (The Korean Nutrition Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

노인의 식생활지침 실천 평가도구 개발

Development of an evaluation tool for dietary guideline adherence in the elderly

  • Young-Suk Lim (Department of Food and Nutrition, Yongin University) ;
  • Ji Soo Oh (Department of Food and Nutrition, Yongin University) ;
  • Hye-Young Kim (Department of Food and Nutrition, Yongin University)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.03
  • 심사 : 2024.01.18
  • 발행 : 2024.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

한국인을 위한 식생활지침은 건강한 식생활을 위한 가이드로 활용되는데, 식생활지침에 대한 세부 항목이 제시되지 않아서 지침에 대한 실천도를 자세히 평가하기는 어렵다. 따라서 본 연구는 식생활지침 실천도를 평가할 수 있는 세부 항목들을 선별하여 지침 실천도를 평가하는 평가도구를 만들고자 수행되었다. 노인의 식생활지침 실천 평가도구 개발을 위하여 문헌검토와 전문가 자문을 거쳐 총 35개의 평가 후보 항목을 추출하고, 전국단위 5개 지역의 남녀 노인 800명 (남 400명, 여 400명)을 대상으로 설문조사를 수행하였다. 식생활지침의 세 가지 영역별로 후보 항목에 대한 탐색적 요인분석으로 평가도구에 사용될 항목을 선별하고, 확인적 요인분석을 수행하여 구성타당도를 검증하였다. 구조방정식 모형의 경로계수를 활용하여 항목별 가중치를 부여하여 식생활지침 실천 점수를 계산하고, 전국조사 결과를 바탕으로 평가도구의 등급 체계를 마련하였다. 본 연구에서 개발된 노인 식생활지침 실천 평가도구는 총 28개 항목으로 식품섭취 영역 13항목, 식생활습관 영역 7항목, 환경을 생각하는 식생활 문화 영역 8항목으로 구성되었다. 식품섭취 영역에는 신선 생채소, 황색채소, 생과일, 콩·견과류, 생선·해산물, 고기·달걀 섭취, 우유·유제품, 잡곡 섭취, 물, 다양한 식품군 섭취, 육류 가시지방 제거, 단 음료, 염장 식품 섭취 항목이 포함되었고, 식생활습관 영역에는 건강체중 유지, 활동량 증가 노력, 운동, 과식정도, 과음빈도, 아침식사 빈도, 식사의 규칙성 항목이 포함되었다. 환경을 생각하는 식생활문화 영역에는 조리 및 음식 먹기 전 손 씻기, 유통기한 (소비기한) 확인, 개인 접시에 덜어 먹기 실천, 냉장고에 보관한 음식 덜어 먹기, 제철음식 섭취, 지역 농산물 이용, 식품 원산지 확인, 음식물 쓰레기 줄이기가 포함되었다. 전국설문조사 노인 (n = 800)의 식생활지침 실천 평균 점수는 56.9점이었고, 식품섭취 영역 49.8점, 식생활습관 영역 63.2점 그리고 식생활문화 영역은 58.6점이었다. 식생활지침 실천 점수는 기 개발된 노인 영양지수 및 식품정보이해력 점수와도 유의한 상관성을 보여서 식생활지침 실천 평가 도구가 식품섭취와 식행동 뿐만 아니라 지속가능한 식생활 실천 부분도 잘 반영한다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 앞으로 노인 맞춤형 식생활지침 실천 평가 도구가 노인들의 식품섭취, 식생활습관 및 식생활문화 영역를 종합적으로 평가하는 쉽고 간편한 검색 평가 도구로 활발하게 활용될 것으로 기대된다.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive tool for assessing dietary guideline adherence among older Korean adults, focusing on the domains of food and nutrient intake, eating habits, and dietary culture. Methods: Candidate items were selected through a literature search and expert advice. The degree of adherence to dietary guidelines was then evaluated through a face-to-face survey conducted on 800 elderly individuals across five nationwide regions. The items for dietary guideline adherence evaluation tool were selected through exploratory factor analysis of the candidate items in each of the three areas of the dietary guidelines, and construct validity was verified by performing confirmatory factor analysis. Using the path coefficient of the structural equation model, weights were assigned to each area and item to calculate the dietary guideline adherence score. A rating system for the evaluation tool was established based on national survey results. Results: A total of twenty-eight items were selected for evaluating dietary guideline adherence among the elderly. Thirteen items related to food intake, seven to eating habits, and eight to dietary culture. The average score for dietary guideline adherence was 56.9 points, with 49.8 points in the food intake area, 63.2 points in the eating habits area, and 58.6 points in the dietary culture area. Statistically significant correlations were found between dietary guideline adherence scores and food literacy (r = 0.679) and nutrition quotient scores (r = 0.750). Conclusion: The developed evaluation tool for dietary guideline adherence among Korean older adults can be used as a simple and effective instrument for comprehensively assessing their food and nutrient intake, dietary habits, and dietary culture.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by a grant (PJ017088) from Rural Development Administration in 2022.

참고문헌

  1. Statistics Korea. The elderly statistics in 2023 [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 18]. Available from: https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10301010000&bid=10820&list_no=427252&act=view&mainXml=Y. 
  2. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Statistical tables [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; 2021 [cited 2023 Dec 18]. Available from: https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/sub04/sub04_04_01.do. 
  3. Park MK, Cho K. The effect of transition to living with chronic diseases on depressive symptoms. J Korea Acad-Ind Cooper Soc 2021; 22(2): 354-361.
  4. Jang SN. Chronic illnesses and limited daily activities in the Korean elderly. Health Welf Policy Forum 2015; 225: 6-17. 
  5. Lee Y. Health and care of older adults in Korea. Health Welf Policy Forum 2018; 264: 19-30.  https://doi.org/10.12934/jkpmhn.2018.27.3.264
  6. Ahn J, Choi H. The trajectories and determinants of medical service utilization, subjective health status, and life satisfaction in middle-aged and elderly people with chronic disease. Health Soc Welf Rev 2023; 43(2): 112-130.
  7. Kim YR. The relationship among the sports-for-all participation, health status, and medical expense of the elderly. Korean J Sport Sci 2006; 17(4): 125-137. 
  8. Kim HR. Quality of diet and nutritional intake and mortality risk among South Korean adults based on 12-year follow-up data. Korean J Community Nutr 2016; 21(4): 354-365. https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.4.354
  9. Kim S, Lee Y. A study on the nutrient intake of the elderly in Korea based on activity limitations: data from the 2019 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Nutr Health 2022; 55(5): 543-557. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2022.55.5.543
  10. Lee Y, Choi Y, Park HR, Song KH, Lee KE, Yoo C, et al. Comparative analysis of dietary behavior and nutrient intake of elderly in urban and rural areas for development of "village lunch table" program. J Nutr Health 2017; 50(2): 171-179. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2017.50.2.171
  11. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2021 Dietary guidelines for Koreans [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 3]. Available from: https://www.mafra.go.kr/sn3hcv_v2023/skin/doc.html?fn=92CD6557-BD59-B227-F5DF-739411D92286.pdf&rs=/sn3hcv_v2023/atchmnfl/bbs/202312. 
  12. Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Lerman JL, Tooze JA, et al. Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet 2018; 118(9): 1591-1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021
  13. Haines PS, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. The Diet Quality Index revised: a measurement instrument for populations. J Am Diet Assoc 1999; 99(6): 697-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00168-6
  14. Yun S, Park S, Yook SM, Kim K, Shim JE, Hwang JY, et al. Development of the Korean Healthy Eating Index for adults, based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutr Res Pract 2022; 16(2): 233-247. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2022.16.2.233
  15. Bailey RL, Mitchell DC, Miller CK, Still CD, Jensen GL, Tucker KL, et al. A dietary screening questionnaire identifies dietary patterns in older adults. J Nutr 2007; 137(2): 421-426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/137.2.421
  16. Bailey RL, Miller PE, Mitchell DC, Hartman TJ, Lawrence FR, Sempos CT, et al. Dietary screening tool identifies nutritional risk in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90(1): 177-183. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2008.27268
  17. Chung MJ, Kwak TK, Kim HY, Kang MH, Lee JS, Chung HR, et al. Development of NQ-E, Nutrition Quotient for Korean elderly: item selection and validation of factor structure. J Nutr Health 2018; 51(1): 87-102. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2018.51.1.87
  18. Lim YS, Lee JS, Hwang JY, Kim KN, Hwang HJ, Kwon S, et al. Revision of Nutrition Quotient for elderly in assessment of dietary quality and behavior. J Nutr Health 2022; 55(1): 155-173. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2022.55.1.155
  19. Kim D, Min S. A study on the dietary status among elderly residents in senior citizen's center using Nutrition Quotient for Elderly. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 2020; 36(4): 382-391. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2020.36.4.382
  20. Bang HK, Kim MO. The dietary status among mild dementia elderly using the Nutrition Quotient for Elderly (NQ-E) in Daegu. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2023; 33(4): 343-353.  https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2023.8.33.4.343
  21. Seo EH. Factors affecting Nutrition Quotient for Elderly (NQ-E) for the elderly in Changwon city. Korean J Food Nutr 2022; 35(2): 75-87. 
  22. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67(12): 2072-2078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050
  23. Vidgen HA. Food literacy: what is it and does it influence what we eat? [Internet]. Brisbane City: Queensland University of Technology; 2014 [cited 2023 Dec 3]. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/19541777.pdf. 
  24. Fordyce-Voorham S. A food literacy model for food education program design and evaluation. Int J Home Econ 2018; 11(2): 2-11. 
  25. Begley A, Paynter E, Butcher LM, Dhaliwal SS. Examining the association between food literacy and food insecurity. Nutrients 2019; 11(2): 445.
  26. Eb J, Kim K, Park S. Defining food literacy and its application to nutrition interventions: a scoping review. Korean J Community Nutr 2021; 26(2): 77-92. https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2021.26.2.77
  27. Lee JY, Shin MJ, Park DH, Choi MK; National Institute of Agricultural Sciences. Food literacy [Internet]. Wanju: National Institute of Agricultural Sciences; 2021 [cited 2023 Nov 2]. Available from: https://www.ntis.go.kr/outcomes/popup/srchTotlRschRpt.do?cmd=get_contents&rstId=REP-2021-01112401782. 
  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NHANES 2019-2020 questionnaire instruments [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 2]. Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/questionnaires.aspx?Cycle=2019-2020. 
  29. Lee SH, Moore L. Public health surveillance of fruit and vegetable intake using the behavioral risk factor surveillance system [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015 [cited 2023 Nov 2]. Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/118746. 
  30. Korean Dietetic Association. Dietary guidelines for the elderly [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Dietetic Association; 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 2]. Available from: https://dietitian.or.kr/work/business/kb_c_family_elderly.do. 
  31. Seoul Food Life Center. 2021 Seoul food statistics survey report (survey sheet for household members) [Internet]. Seoul: Seoul Food Life Center; 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 2]. Available from: https://www.seoulnutri.co.kr/food-db/93.do?curPage=4. 
  32. National Institute of Health. Korean Genome Epidemiologic Survey (KoGES) lifestyle survey - dietary habits 2014 [Internet]. Cheongju: National Institute of Health; 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 2]. Available from: https://nih.go.kr/ko/main/contents.do?menuNo=300569. 
  33. Lim YS, Oh JS, Hwang JY, Oh J, Yook SM, Kim MA, et al. Development of food behavior evaluation items for the elderly based on Korean dietary guidelines. J Korean Soc Food Cult. Forthcoming 2024. 
  34. Tinsley HE, Tinsley DJ. Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol 1987; 34(4): 414-424. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.414
  35. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. Oaks (CA); 2003. 
  36. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River (NJ); 2002. 
  37. Hair JF. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River (NJ); 2009. 
  38. Jorreskog K, Sorbom D. Lisrel 8: structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Skokie (IL); 1993. 
  39. Schunemann HJ, Sperati F, Barba M, Santesso N, Melegari C, Akl EA, et al. An instrument to assess quality of life in relation to nutrition: item generation, item reduction and initial validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010; 8(1): 26.
  40. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. The 3rd (2020-2024) dietary education basic plan 2020 [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.mafra.go.kr/home/5109/subview.do?enc=Zm5jdDF8QEB8JTJGYmJzJTJGaG9tZSUyRjc5MiUyRjU2MTg3MSUyRmFydGNsVmlldy5kbyUzRg%3D%3D. 
  41. Patterson RE, Haines PS, Popkin BM. Diet quality index: capturing a multidimensional behavior. J Am Diet Assoc 1994; 94(1): 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8223(94)92042-7
  42. Kim S, Haines PS, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. The Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I) provides an effective tool for cross-national comparison of diet quality as illustrated by China and the United States. J Nutr 2003; 133(11): 3476-3484. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/133.11.3476
  43. Vellas B, Anthony P. The MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment). Proceedings of an IANA (International Academy on Nutrition and Aging) workshop. May 2-3, 2006. Chicago, Illinois, USA. J Nutr Health Aging 2006; 10(6): 455-560.
  44. Posner BM, Jette AM, Smith KW, Miller DR. Nutrition and health risks in the elderly: the nutrition screening initiative. Am J Public Health 1993; 83(7): 972-978. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.83.7.972
  45. United Nations. Sustainable development goals [Internet]. New York (NY): United Nations; 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.un-page.org/sustainable-development. 
  46. United Nations. The 4th basic plan for sustainable development, 2021-2040 [Internet]. New York (NY): United Nations; 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/event-documents/ROK_CS77_Agenda%204%28a%29_ROK%20Statement_APFSD.pdf.