DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

산림복원 평가지표를 활용한 산림 훼손지 우선복원대상지 발굴 - 강원도 지역을 대상으로 -

Identification of Priority Restoration Areas for Forest Damage Sites Using Forest Restoration Evaluation Indicators in Gangwon-Do

  • 박윤선 (한국산지보전협회 산지정책연구센터) ;
  • 송정은 (한국산지보전협회 산지정책연구센터) ;
  • 박천희 (한국산지보전협회 산지공간연구센터)
  • Yoon-Sun Park (Forestland Policy Research Division, Korea Forest Conservation Association) ;
  • Jung-Eun Song (Forestland Policy Research Division, Korea Forest Conservation Association) ;
  • Chun-Hee Park (Forestland Spatial Planning Division, Korea Forest Conservation Association)
  • 투고 : 2023.09.21
  • 심사 : 2023.12.26
  • 발행 : 2024.02.29

초록

This study was conducted to select the restoration priority of forest damage sites in Gangwon Province. We first identified the status of damaged areas. We then selected restoration evaluation indicators through a literature review. We then set weights for these indicators through expert surveys. We next acquired data that can represent these indicators and spatially mapped them. Finally, we prioritized the restoration target sites by taking the weights. The results of the study showed that disaster sensitivity and ecologicality are important criteria for selecting the restoration priority of damage sites. The analysis showed that damage sites in Doam, Jeongseon, Samcheok and Inje are in urgent need of restoration. The results of this study are significant in that they selected the restoration priority of damage sites in Gangwon Province based on the restoration priority evaluation criteria selected based on expert surveys. However, the priority restoration areas derived from the results of this study are not actually implementing restoration projects at present. Therefore, it is judged that it would be efficient in various aspects to establish the restoration priority area based on scientific analysis techniques and carry out the project for efficient implementation of the restoration project. In this study, it can be pointed out that the priority of restoration of damage sites was derived based on data from the past due to the limitation of data acquisition. However, the fact that the priority restoration area inferred based on past data has been restored over time has improved the reliability of the study by verifying the usefulness of the priority extraction technique. In the future, if the priority of damage sites is extracted by extracting the restoration target area boundary through the latest data based on the methodology applied in this study, it is considered that it will be available as a result that can be applied to the field.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. NIFoS. 2023. Forest public function evaluation results as of 2020
  2. Lee SH.Le SH.Le SA and Choi JY. 2015. Development of Evaluation Indicesfor Ecological Restoration of Degraded Environments Near DMZ in the Republic of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 18(1), 135-151. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2015.18.1.135
  3. Choi JY. Lee SH.Le SA.Ji SY and Lee SH. 2016. Evaluation Method Development for Ecological Restorations by Damaged Types. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 19(1), 121-133. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.1.121
  4. KFCA. 2016. Survey of the target site to establish a forest restoration system. KFS
  5. KFCA. 2019. Survey of deforestation areas and restoration technology research by type I
  6. MOE. 2014. LandCoverMap
  7. KFS. 2020. Forest basic statistics 2020
  8. Malczewski, J. 1999. Visualization in multicriteria spatial decision support systems. Geomatica, 53(2): 139-147.
  9. Orsi F.. Geneletti D. & Newton A. C. 2011. Towards a common set of criteria and indicatorsto identify forestrestoration priorities: An expert panel-based approach. Ecological indicators, 11(2): 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.06.001
  10. Rajaonarivelo F. & Williams R. A. 2022. Remote Sensing-Based Land Suitability Analysis for Forest Restoration in Madagascar. Forests, 13(10): 1727.
  11. Valente R. A.. Petean F. C. D. S. & Vettorazzi C. A. 2017. Multicriteria decision analysis for prioritizing areasfor forestrestoration.Cerne, 23: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201723012258
  12. Vogler K. C.. Ager A. A.. Day M. A..Jennings M. & Bailey J. D. 2015. Prioritization of forest restoration projects: tradeoffs between wildfire protection, ecological restoration and economic objectives. Forests, 6(12): 4403-4420. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6124375