DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비선형동적해석을 통한 건식 기계적이음을 갖는 프리캐스트 모멘트 골조의 동등성 평가

Evaluation of Emulative Level for Precast Moment Frame Systems with Dry Mechanical Splices by Using Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

  • 김선훈 (충북대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 이원준 (충북대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 이득행 (충북대학교 건축공학과)
  • Kim, Seon-Hoon (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Won Jun (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Deuckhang (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.11.06
  • 심사 : 2023.11.28
  • 발행 : 2024.03.01

초록

This study presents code-compliant seismic details by addressing dry mechanical splices for precast concrete (PC) beam-column connections in the ACI 318-19 code. To this end, critical observations of previous test results on precast beam-column connection specimens with the proposed seismic detail are briefly reported in this study, along with a typical reinforced concrete (RC) monolithic connection. On this basis, nonlinear dynamic models were developed to verify seismic responses of the PC emulative moment-resisting frame systems. As the current design code allows only the emulative design approach, this study aims at identifying the seismic performances of PC moment frame systems depending on their emulative levels, for which two extreme cases were intentionally chosen as the non-emulative (unbonded self-centering with marginal energy dissipation) and fully-emulative connection details. Their corresponding hysteresis models were set by using commercial finite element analysis software. According to the current seismic design provisions, a typical five-story building was designed as a target PC building. Subsequently, nonlinear dynamic time history analyses were performed with seven ground motions to investigate the impact of emulation level or hysteresis models (i.e., energy dissipation performance) on system responses between the emulative and non-emulative PC moment frames. The analytical results showed that both the base shear and story drift ratio were substantially reduced in the emulative system compared to that of the non-emulative one, and it indicates the importance of the code-compliant (i.e., emulative) connection details on the seismic performance of the precast building.

키워드

과제정보

이 성과는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No. RS-2023-00209647).

참고문헌

  1. Zhang W, Kim SH, Lee DH. Seismic Performance of Self-Sustaining Precast Wide Beam-Column Connections for Fast-Built Construction. Computer and Concrete. 2023 Jul;33(3):339-349.
  2. Choi HK, Choi YC, Choi CS. Hysteretic Behavior and Seismic Resistant Capacity of Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections. EESK J Earthquake Eng. 2010 Aug;14(4):61-71. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2010.14.4.061
  3. Sung HS, Ahn SR, Park SY, Kang THK. Quasi-Static and Shaking Table Tests of Precast Concrete Structures Utilizing Clamped Mechanical Splice. EESK J Earthquake Eng. 2023 Jan;27(1):37-47. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2023.27.1.037
  4. Zhang W, Lee DH, Kim SH, Ju HJ, Lee CH. Seismic Performance of Precast Wide Beam-Column Connections with Asymmetrical Anchorage Reinforcement Details. Engineering Structures. 2023 Jan;275:115237.
  5. Kim SH, Lee DH, Kim YG, Lee SW, Yeo UY, Park JE. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Dry Precast Concrete Beam-Column Connections with Special Moment Frame Details. EESK J Earthquake Eng. 2023 Sep;27(5):203-211. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2023.27.5.203
  6. MORIT. Seismic Design Standard for Concrete Structures (KDS 14 20 80). Sejong, Korea; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; c2021. 24 p.
  7. KS D 0249. Method of Inspection for Mechanical Splicing Joint of Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, Korean Standard Association; c2019.
  8. MORIT. Precast Concrete Structure Design Standard (KDS 14 20 62). Sejong, Korea; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; c2021. 14 p.
  9. ACI Committee 374. Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames based on structural testing and commentary (ACI 374.1-05). Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute; c2005. 9 p.
  10. Kim SH, C ho J, Oh HK, C hoi SD, Yeo UY, Lee DH. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Dry Precast Concrete Beam-Column Connections with Intermediate Moment Frame Details. EESK J Earthquake Eng. 2023 May;27(3):129-137. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2023.27.3.129
  11. ACI Committee 374. ACI 374.2-13 Guide for Testing Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements under Slowly Applied Simulated Seismic Loads. Farmington Mills, MI: American Concrete Institute; c2013. 18 p.
  12. Lee JY, Byun HW. Emulation Evaluation of Precast Concrete Structures. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute. 2022 Dec;34(6):633-644. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2022.34.6.633
  13. Korea Construction Standard Center. Seismic Building Design Code (KDS 41 17 00); c2019.
  14. MIDAS IT. Nonlinear Time History Analysis of Architectural Structures for Performance-Based Design. MIDAS GEN; c2022.
  15. American Society of Civil Engineers. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-17): Reston; c2017.
  16. American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structure (ASCE/SEC 7-22): Reston; c2022.