재활치료과학 (Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation)

  • 제13권1호
  • /
  • Pages.49-63
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2635-9340(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-4329(eISSN)
대한신경계작업치료학회 (Korean Society of Neurological Occupational Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

발달장애 아동 부모의 인지재활 경험에 대한 질적 연구: 워드 클라우드 분석과 현상학적 연구 방법 혼합설계

Parents' Perceptions of Cognitive Rehabilitation for Children With Developmental Disabilities: A Mixed-Method Approach of Phenomenological Methodology and Word Cloud Analysis

  • 주유미 (동국대학교 교육서비스과학대학원 인간발달.재활전공) ;
  • 김영근 (대구보건대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이희령 (원광대학교 대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 홍승표 (동남보건대학교 작업치료과) ;
  • 한대성 (상지대학교 보건의료대학 작업치료학과)
  • Ju, Yu-Mi (Major in Human Development and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Education Service Science, Dongguk University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Geun (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Daegu Health College) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Ryoung (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Hong, Seung-Pyo (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Dongnam Health University) ;
  • Han, Dae-Sung (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Sangji University)
  • 투고 : 2023.11.03
  • 심사 : 2024.01.23
  • 발행 : 2024.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적 : 본 연구의 목적은 현상학적 방법론과 워드 클라우드 분석을 통해 발달장애 아동 부모의 인지재활 경험에 대한 인식을 알아보기 위함이다. 연구방법 : 인지재활에 대한 부모 인식을 알아보기 위하여 발달장애 아동의 부모 5명을 심층 인터뷰하였다. 아울러 Python을 사용하여 워드 클라우드 분석을 하였고, 출현 빈도 수가 높은 단어를 중심으로 5명의 연구자가 의미 단위와 주제를 현상학적 방법으로 분석하였다. 결과 : 인지재활의 현상에 대한 의미 단위 43개 및 구성요소 9개를 도출하였고, 이로부터 총 3개의 주제를 최종 도출하였다. 도출된 중심 주제는 인지재활의 정의, 인지재활의 문제점, 인지재활 기관 선택 시 고려사항이었다. 인지재활은 발달장애 아동의 학습, 일상생활 기능, 인지기능 향상을 목적으로 하는 치료라는 인식이 있었다. 인지재활의 문제점으로는 치료방식, 치료사의 전문성, 치료비용에 관한 문제인식이 있었다. 마지막으로, 인지재활 기관 선택 시 고려사항으로는 치료사의 전문성, 입소문, 비용과 시간의 적정성이 있었다. 결론 : 발달장애 아동의 부모는 인지재활을 통해 아동의 실질적인 기능 향상을 기대하고 있었고, 이와 더불어 임상에는 현실적인 문제들이 존재하고 있었다. 본 연구는 부모가 인식하는 문제점들을 보완한 보다 나은 인지재활 서비스로 발전되는 데 기초자료가 될 것이다.

Objective : The purpose of this study was to investigate parental perspectives on cognitive rehabilitation using a combination of phenomenological research methodology and word cloud analysis. Methods : Interviews were conducted with five parents of children with developmental disabilities. Word cloud analysis was conducted using Python, and five researchers analyzed the meaning units and themes using phenomenological methods. Words with high frequency were considered as a heuristic tool. Results : A total of 43 meaning units and nine components related to the phenomenon of cognitive rehabilitation were derived, and three themes were finalized. The main themes encompassed the definition of cognitive rehabilitation, challenges associated with cognitive rehabilitation, and factors influencing the selection of a cognitive rehabilitation institute. Cognitive rehabilitation emerged as a treatment focused on improving learning, daily functioning, and cognitive abilities in children with developmental disabilities. The perceived issues with cognitive rehabilitation pertained to treatment methods, therapist expertise, and associated costs. In addition, parents highlighted the importance of therapist expertise, humane personality, and affordability of cost and schedule when choosing a cognitive rehabilitation institute. Conclusion : Parents expressed expectations for substantial improvements in their children's daily functioning through cognitive rehabilitation. However, challenges were identified in clinical practices. Going forward, we expect that cognitive rehabilitation will evolve into a better therapeutic support service addressing the concerns raised by parents.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abreu, B. C., & Toglia, J. P. (1987). Cognitive rehabilitation: A model for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41(7), 439-448. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.41.7.439 
  2. Ahn, S., & Hwang, S. (2017). Cognitive rehabilitation with neurodevelopmental disorder: A systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation, 41(4), 707-719. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-172146 
  3. Allen, R. A., Robins, D. L., & Decker, S. L. (2008). Autism spectrum disorders: Neurobiology and current assessment practices. Psychology in the Schools, 45(10), 905-917. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20341 
  4. Baek, S. S. (2020). Importance-performance analysis of parent's needs for children with disabilities regarding health care, rehabilitation and sepcial education service system. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science, 59(4), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.23944/Jsers.2020.12.59.4.8 
  5. Beck, A. T. (2005). The current state of cognitive therapy: A 40-year retrospective. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(9), 953-959. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.953 
  6. Case-Smith, J., & Arbesman, M. (2008). Evidence-based review of interventions for autism used in or of relevance to occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(4), 416-429. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.4.416 
  7. Cicerone, K. D., Langenbahn, D. M., Braden, C., Malec, J. F., Kalmar, K., Fraas, M., Felicetti, T., Laatsch, L., Harley, J. P., Bergquist, T., Azulay, J., Cantor, J., & Ashman, T. (2011). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(4), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015 
  8. Clare, L. (2003). Rehabilitation for people with dementia. In B. A. Wilson (Ed.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation: Theory and practice (pp. 197-216). Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers. 
  9. Clare, L., & Woods, R. T. (2004). Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease: A review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14(4), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010443000074 
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications. 
  11. Fone, S. (2006). Effective supervision for occupational ther apists: The development and implementation of an information package. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53(4), 277-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00581.x 
  12. Gaitskell, S., & Morley, M. (2008). Supervision in occupational therapy: How are we doing? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(3), 119-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260807100310 
  13. Gates, N. J., Sachdev, P. S., Fiatarone Singh, M. A., & Valenzuela, M. (2011). Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A systematic review. BMC Geriatrics, 11, 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-55 
  14. Giles, G. M., Edwards, D. F., Baum, C., Furniss, J., Skidmore, E., Wolf, T., & Leland, N. E. (2020). Making functional cognition a professional priority. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(1), 7401090010p1-7401090010p6. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.741002 
  15. Giorgi, A. (2002). The question of validity in qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 33(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916202320900392 
  16. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass. 
  17. Han, J., Li, X., & Hwang, H. (2022). A study on the consumer boycott participation experience: Using text mining analysis and in-depth interview. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 22(2), 88-106. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2022.22.02.088 
  18. Hong, H. T., & Lee, H. R. (2022). Sensory integration clinical adaptation of novice occupational therapists working at a child private clinic center. The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 20(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.18064/JKASI.2022.20.1.39 
  19. Jeon, M. R., Yoo, E. Y., Jung, M. Y., & Lee, J. Y. (2016). A survey on the current state and demand of consultation of parents who have children with disabilities in the area of occupational therapy. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 24(2), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2016.24.2.04 
  20. Kang, K. H., Son, H. J., & Jee, A. Y. (2015). A study on the parents' perception of therapeutic support service for persons with special educational needs. Explorations into Future Education, 36(2), 1-28. 
  21. Katz, N. (1994). Cognitive rehabilitation: Models for intervention and research on cognition in occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy International, 1(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.6150010107 
  22. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. W. W. Norton. 
  23. Kim, J. Y., & Choi, S. G. (2007). Actual condition of language therapy service for parents of children with speech disorder. Journal of Speech-Language & Hearing Disorders, 16(3), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.15724/jslhd.2007.16.3.007 
  24. Kim, B. H., Kim, K. J., Park, I. S., Lee, K. J., Kim, J. K., Hong, J. J., Lee, M. W., Kim, Y. H., Yoo, I. Y., & Lee, H. Y. (1999). A comparison of phenomenological research methodology: Focused on Giorgi, Colaizzi, Van Kaam methods. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 29(6), 1208-1220. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.1999.29.6.1208 
  25. Kim, Y. H., Ko, M. H., Seo, J. H., Park, S. H., Kim, K. S., Jang, E. H., Park, S. W., Park, J. H., & Jo, Y. J. (2003). Effect of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation program for attention training in brain injury. Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, 27(6), 830-839. 
  26. Kim, Y. G., & Lee, M. J. (2013). The effect on Computer-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation Program for Children (CoTras-C) for the cognitive ability and visual perception in developmental disability. Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 17(3), 391-414. 
  27. Kim, Y. H., Park, J. M., Kim, J. H., Lee, J. O., & Shin, Y. I. (2018). The characteristics of the recognition that physical disability children's parents have about special education related services. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science, 57(2), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.23944/Jsers.2018.06.57.2.9 
  28. Lee, N. I. (2005). Phenomenology and qualitative research method. Phenomenology and Modern Philosophy, 24, 91-121. 
  29. Lee, H. J., & Chung, H. S. (2020). The effects of the learning tree cognitive model program on supporting school based occupational therapy for children with developmental delay. Journal of Korean Society of Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, 12(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.29144/KSCTE.2020.12.1.37 
  30. Lee, H., & Hwang, S. T. (1996). Clinical study of child and adolescent psychiatric outpatients. Korean Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 7(1), 14-22. 
  31. Lee, N. H., & Kim, K. M. (2014). A phenomenological study on the experience of parents of children with disabilities. Journal of Korean Society Journal of Occupational Therapy, 22(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2014.22.1.04 
  32. Lee, S. S., Powell, N. J., & Esdaile, S. (2001). A functional model of cognitive rehabilitation in occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740106800105 
  33. Miotto, E. C., Serrao, V. T., Guerra, G. B., de Lucia, M. C. S., & Scaff, M. (2008). Cognitive rehabilitation of neuropsychological deficits and mild cognitive impairment: A review of the literature. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 2(2), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642009DN20200011 
  34. Park, S. W. (2021). Comparison before and after the application of the computerized cognitive rehabilitation program(CoTras-C) for children with cerebral palsy. Journal of the Korean Society of Integrative Medicine, 9(3), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.15268/KSIM.2021.9.3.09 
  35. Pyo, Y. H. (2012). A qualitative inquiry on the therapeutic support in the educational environment. Korean Council of Physical, Multiple & Health Disabilities, 55(3), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.20971/kcpmd.2012.55.3.251 
  36. Schell, B. A. B., Gillen, G., Scaffa, M. E., & Cohn, E. S. (2013). Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy (12th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 
  37. Shin, K. R. (1996). Criteria for critique of qualitative nursing research. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 26(2), 497-506. https://doi.org/10.4040/jnas.1996.26.2.497 
  38. Spector, A., Orrell, M., Davies, S., & Woods, B. (2001). Can reality orientation be rehabilitated? Development and piloting of an evidence-based programme of cognition-based therapies for people with dementia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 11(3-4), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010143000068 
  39. Strobach, T., & Karbach, J. (2016). Cognitive training: An overview of features and applications. Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42662-4 
  40. Toglia, J. P. (2011). The dynamic interactional model of cognition in cognitive rehabilitation. In N. Katz (Ed.), Cognition, occupation, and participation across the life span: Neuroscience, neurorehabilitation, and models of intervention in occupational therapy (pp. 161-201). American Occupational Therapy Association. 
  41. Toglia, J., & Foster, E. R. (2021). The multicontext approach to cognitive rehabilitation: A metacognitive strategy intervention to optimize functional cognition. Gatekeeper Press. 
  42. Tsantali, E., Economidis, D., & Rigopoulou, S. (2017). Testing the benefits of cognitive training vs. cognitive stimulation in mild Alzheimer's disease: A randomised controlled trial. Brain Impairment, 18(2), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2017.6 
  43. Vas, A. K., Luedtke, A., Ortiz, E., & Neville, M. (2021). Bottom-up and top-down cognitive rehabilitation following mild traumatic brain injury - Occupational therapists' perspective: An online survey study. The Indian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoth.ijoth_8_21 
  44. Wolf, T. J., Edwards, D. F., & Giles, G. M. (2019). Functional cognition and occupational therapy: A practical approach to treating individuals with cognitive loss. AOTA Press. 
  45. Woods, B., Rai, H. K., Elliott, E., Aguirre, E., Orrell, M., & Spector, A. (2023). Cognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning in people with dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1), CD005562. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub3 
  46. Wilson, B. A. (1997). Cognitive rehabilitation: How it is and how it might be. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3(5), 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617797004876 
  47. Yu, C. H., Jannasch-Pennell, A., & DiGangi, S. (2011). Compatibility between text mining and qualitative research in the perspectives of grounded theory, content analysis, and reliability. The Qualitative Report, 16(3), 730-744. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1085