Animal Bioscience

  • 제37권3호
  • /
  • Pages.500-508
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of body weight at photostimulation on productive performance and welfare aspects of commercial layers

  • Fazal Raziq (Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences) ;
  • Jibran Hussain (Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences) ;
  • Sohail Ahmad (Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences) ;
  • Muhammad Asif Hussain (College of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Abdul Wali khan University) ;
  • Muhammad Tahir Khan (Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences) ;
  • Assad Ullah (Civil Veterinary Hospital Gumbat) ;
  • Muhammad Qumar (Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences) ;
  • Fazal Wadood (Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences) ;
  • Gull-e-Faran (Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur)
  • 투고 : 2022.09.17
  • 심사 : 2023.02.01
  • 발행 : 2024.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: Due to current selection practices for increased egg production and peak persistency, the production profile, age at maturity, and body weight criteria for commercial layers are constantly changing. Body weight and age at the time of photostimulation will thus always be the factors that need to be adequately addressed among various production systems. The current study was carried out to determine the effects of pullets' body weight (low, medium, and heavy) on their performance, welfare, physiological response, and hormonal profile. Methods: With regard to live weight, 150 16-week-old pullets were divided into three groups using a completely randomized design (CRD) and held until the 50th week. One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the data under the CRD, and the least significant difference test was used to distinguish between treatment means. Results: In comparison to the medium and light birds, the heavy birds had higher body weight at maturity, an earlier age at maturity, and higher egg weight, eggshell weight, eggshell thickness, egg yolk index, breaking strength, egg surface area, egg shape index, egg volume, and hormonal profile except corticosterone. However, the medium and light birds had lower feed consumption rates per dozen eggs and per kilogram of egg mass than the heavy birds. Light birds showed greater body weight gain, egg production, and egg specific gravity than the other categories. At 20 weeks of age, physiological response, welfare aspects, and catalase were non-significant; however, at 50 weeks of age, all these factors-aside from catalase-were extremely significant. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that layers can function at lower body weights during photostimulation; hence, dietary regimens that result in lighter pullets may be preferable. Additionally, the welfare of the birds was not compromised by the lighter weight group.

키워드

과제정보

All the authors would like to acknowledgement faculty members of Poultry Production Department, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore- Pakistan for providing support necessary for this study.

참고문헌

  1. Hanlon C, Takeshima K, Bedecarrats GY. Changes in the control of the hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal axis across three differentially selected strains of laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Front Physiol 2021;12:651491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651491 
  2. Baylan M, Canogullari S, Shin A, Copur G, Baylan M. Effects of different selection methods for body weight on some genetic parameters in Japanese quail. J Anim Vet Adv 2009; 8:1385-91. 
  3. Lewis PD, Gous RM, Morris TR. Model to predict age at sexual maturity in broiler breeders given a single increment in photoperiod. Br Poult Sci 2007;48:625-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660701573060 
  4. Renema RA, Robinson FE, Goerzen PR. Effects of altering growth curve and age at photostimulation in female broiler breeders. 1. Reproductive development. Can J Anim Sci 2001;81:467-76. https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-109 
  5. Braz NM, Freitas ER, Bezerra RM, et al. Fiber in growth ration and its effects on performance of laying hens during the growing and laying phases. Rev Bras Zootec 2011;40:2744-53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001200019 
  6. Leeson S, Caston L, Summers JD. Layer performance of four strains of Leghorn pullets subjected to various rearing programs. Poult Sci 1997;76:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.1.1 
  7. Oke UK, Herbert U, Nwachukwu EN. Association between body weight and some egg production traits in the guinea fowl (Numida meleagris galeata. Pallas). Livest Res Rural Dev 2004;16:72. 
  8. Kretzschmar-McCluskey V, Fisher C, Tuijil OV. A practical guide to managing feather cover in broiler breeder females. Huntsville, AL, USA: Ross Technotes, Aviagen Group; 2014. 
  9. Lacin E, Yildiz A, Esenbuga N, Macit M. Effects of differences in the initial body weight of groups on laying performance and egg quality parameters of Lohmann laying hens. Czech J Anim Sci 2008;53:466-71.  https://doi.org/10.17221/341-CJAS
  10. Perez-Bonilla A, Novoa S, Garcia J, Mohiti-Asli M, Frikha M, Mateos GG. Effects of energy concentration of the diet on productive performance and egg quality of brown egg-laying hens differing in initial body weight. Poult Sci 2012;91:3156-66. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02526 
  11. Pishnamazi A, Renema RA, Zuidhif MJ, Robinson F. Effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation in broiler breeder pullets. Poult Sci 2014;93:1274-81. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02834 
  12. El-Sagheer M, Hassanein HH. Productive performance of Bovans brown and Hy-sex brown laying hens as affected by body weight at 20 weeks of age. Egypt Poult Sci J 2006;26:731-47. 
  13. Triyuwanta, Leterrier C, Brillard JP, Nys Y. Maternal body weight and feed allowance of breeders affect performance of dwarf broiler breeders and tibial ossification of their progeny. Poult Sci 1992;71:244-54. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710244 
  14. van der Klein SAS, Bedecarrats GY, Robison FE, Zaiudhof MJ. Early photostimulation at the recommended body weight reduced broiler breeder performance. Poult Sci 2018;97:3736-45. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey215 
  15. Romero LF, Zuidhof MJ, Renema RA, Naeima A, Robinson FE. Characterization of energetic efficiency in adult broiler breeder hens. Poult Sci 2009;88:227-35. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00141 
  16. Gordon R, Bryant MM, Roland DA. Performance and profitability of second-cycle laying hens as influenced by body weight and body weight reduction during molt. J Appl Poult Res 2009;18:223-31. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2008-00014 
  17. Mekky SS, Galal A, Zaky HI, El-Dein AZ. Laying performance and egg quality traits in white and brown commercial hens. J Anim Poult Prod 2016;7:185-9.  https://doi.org/10.21608/jappmu.2016.48699
  18. Bell DD, Weaver WD. Commercial chicken meat and egg production. 5th Edition, XCVI. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. 1365 p. 
  19. Tumova E, Gous RM. Interaction of hen production type, age, and temperature on laying pattern and egg quality. Poult Sci 2012;91:1269-75. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01951 
  20. Mayne RK. A review of the aetiology and possible causative factors of foot pad dermatitis in growing turkeys and broilers. World's Poult Sci J 2005;61:256-67. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200458 
  21. Shepherd EM, Fairchild BD. Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poult Sci 2010;89:2043-51. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00770 
  22. Hocking PM, Wu K. Traditional and commercial turkeys show similar susceptibility to foot pad dermatitis and behavioural evidence of pain. Br Poult Sci 2013;54:281-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.781265 
  23. Kiani A, von Borstel UK. Impact of different group sizes on plumage cleanliness and leg disorders in broilers. Livest Sci 2019;221:52-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.01.013 
  24. Mongin P, Lacassagne L. Physiology of chicken egg shell formation and lung ventilation. Comptes Rendus Academie Sci., Paris, France: 1965;261:4228-9. 
  25. Ghayas A, Hussain J, Mahmud A, Jaspal MH. Evaluation of three fast- and slow-growing chicken strains reared in two production environments. S Afr J Anim Sci 2020;50:378-88. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v50i3.4 
  26. Hassaan SF, Elsalmoney AE, Fathi MM. Relationship between triiodothyronine (T3) and Insulin-like growth factor (IGF1) hormones in Egyptian local chickens during growth period. Egypt Poult Sci 2008;28:251-63. 
  27. Renema RA, Robinson FE, Proudman JA, Newcombe M, Mckay RI. Effects of Body weight and feed allocation during sexual maturation in broiler breeder hens. 2. Ovarian morphology and plasma hormone profiles. Poult Sci 1999;78:629-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.5.619 
  28. Huff GR, Huff WE, Rath NC, de Los Santos FS, Farnell MB, Donoghue AM. Influence of hen age on the response of turkey poults to cold stress, Escherichia coli challenge, and treatment with a yeast extract antibiotic alternative. Poult Sci 2007;86:636-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.4.636 
  29. Weimer SL, Wideman RF, Scanes CG, Mauromoustakos A, Vizzier-Thaxton Y. Broiler stress response to light intensity, flooring type, and leg weakness as assessed by heterophil to lymphocyte ratios, serum corticosterone, infrared thermography, and latency to lie. Poult Sci 2020;99:3301-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.028 
  30. Jena BS, Nayak SB, Patnaik BK. Age related changes in catalase activity and its inhibition Manganese (ii) chlorid in brains of two poikilothermic vertebrates. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1998;26:119-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4943(97)00038-1