DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of livestock industry on climate change: Case Study in South Korea - A review

  • Sun Jin Hur (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Jae Min Kim (Farm and Table Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Dong Gyun Yim (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yohan Yoon (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Sang Suk Lee (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Cheorun Jo (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2023.07.11
  • Accepted : 2023.09.15
  • Published : 2024.03.01

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing argument attributing the primary cause of global climate change to livestock industry, which has led to the perception that the livestock industry is synonymous with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, a closer examination of the global GHG emission by sector reveals that the energy sector is responsible for the majority, accounting for 76.2% of the total, while agriculture contributes 11.9%. According to data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the total GHG emissions associate with the livestock supply chain amount to 14.5%. Within this, emissions from direct sources, such as enteric fermentation and livestock manure treatment, which are not part of the front and rear industries, represent only 7%. Although it is true that the increase in meat consumption driven by global population growth and rising incomes, has contributed to higher methane (CH4) emissions resulting from enteric fermentation in ruminant animals, categorizing the livestock industry as the primary source of GHG emissions oversimplifies a complex issue and disregards objective data. Therefore, it may be a misleading to solely focus on the livestock sector without addressing the significant emissions from the energy sector, which is the largest contributor to GHG emissions. The top priority should be the objective and accurate measurement of GHG emissions, followed by the development and implementation of suitable reduction policies for each industrial sector with significant GHG emissions contributions.

Keywords

References

  1. Havlik P, Valin H, Herrero M, et al. Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2014;111:3709-14. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308044111
  2. Steinfeld H. Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2006.
  3. Thornton PK. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2010;365:2853-67. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134
  4. World Resources Institute. World Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 2019. [cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: https://www.wri.org/data/world-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2019
  5. Choi SW, Kim H, Kim J. Development of 'Carbon Footprint' Concept and Its Utilization Prospects in the Agricultural and Forestry Sector. Korean J Agric For Meteorol 2015;17:358-83. https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2015.17.4.358
  6. Euro-CASE. Energy transitions in Europe common goals but difference paths. c2019 [cited 2023 April 12], Available from: https://www.euro-case.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Eurocase/Publications/PDF/platform_energie2019.pdf
  7. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, et al. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Cambridge UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
  8. Ministry of Environment Korea. Major policies_Publication of the 2020 National Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2018). c2020 [cited 2023 Apr 12]. Available from: https://www.gir. go.kr/home/board/read.do?pagerOffset=0&maxPageItems=10&maxIndexPages=10&searchKey=&searchValue=& menuId=36&boardId=51&boardMasterId=2&boardCate goryId=
  9. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Enabling agriculture to contribute to climate change. The Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations; c2009 [cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/smsn/igo/036.pdf
  10. Climatewatch. Historical GHG Emissions; 2020 [cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions?breakBy=sector§ors=agriculture%2Ctransportation&source=Climate%20Watch
  11. Jeong HC, Lee JS, Choi EJ, et al. Post-2020 emission projection and potential reduction analysis in agricultural sector. J Clim Change Res 2016;3:233-41.
  12. Jang YJ, Pyeon J. Impact of technological change in agriculture and implications of greenhouse gas emissions. Seoul, Korea: National Assembly Research Service; 2020 [cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: https://www.nars.go.kr/eng/report/view.do?cmsCode=CM0144&brdSeq=30770
  13. Park JY. Steelmaking, cement and plastic are the main causes of 'greenhouse gas emissions'; 2020 [cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: https://www.newstof.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=10177
  14. Kim MS, Yang SH, Oh YK, Park KH. Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from Korean livestock during the period 1990~2013. J Clim Change Res 2016;7:383-90. https://www.doi.org/10.15531/ksccr.2016.7.4.383
  15. Ministry of Environment Korea. Greenhouse gas emissions expected to decrease for two consecutive years since 2018. c2021 [cited 2023 Apr 12]. Available from: https://www.gir.go.kr/home/board/read.do?menuld=11&boardld=161&boardMasterld=4
  16. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Korea; 2018 [cited 2023 Apr 12]. Available from: https://www.gir.go.kr/eng/
  17. Goodland R, Anhang J. Livestock and climate change: What if the key actors in climate change are... cows, pigs, and chickens? Washington, USA: Worldwatch Institute; 2009.
  18. Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, et al. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013.
  19. Lee D, Jung S, So K, et al. Evaluation of mitigation technologies and footprint of carbon in unhulled rice production. J Clim Change Res 2012;3:129-42.
  20. Xu X, Sharma P, Shu S, et al. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat Food 2021;2:724-32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x
  21. Wilson L. The carbon foodprint of 5 diets compared; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 12]. Available from: https://shrinkthatfootprint.com/food-carbon-footprint-diet/
  22. Cho SH, Seong PN, Kang GH, Kang SM, Park BY. Development of carbon reduction system for meat production, processing and distribution. Jeonju, Korea: Rural Development Administration c2015 [cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchReport.do?cn=TRKO201500010318
  23. Matthews C. Livestock a major threat to environment. Rome, Italy: FAO Newsroom; 2006.
  24. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions; 2022 [cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  25. Nutrient Stewardship. What are the 4Rs; 2013 [cited 2023 Apr 12]. Available from: https://nutrientstewardship.org/4rs/
  26. Kirby A. Kick the habit: A UN guide to climate neutrality. UN Environment Programme; 2008.
  27. Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). Emissions data and maps; 2019 [cited 2023 Apr 12]. Available from: https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/emissions_data_and_maps
  28. International Energy Agency (IEA). CO2 Emissions from fuel combustion; 2019 [cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/abf78b7f-29dc4cb9-bb9c-1a875486d09a/Worldco2_Documentation.pdf
  29. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Enabling agriculture to contribute to climate change. The Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations; c2009 [cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/smsn/igo/036.pdf
  30. Korea Rural Economic Institute (KREI). A study on the directions of developing systematic feeds and measures to pursue joint projects; 2004 [cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: https://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/14675