Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology (대한치과마취과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The utilization of video laryngoscopy in nasotracheal intubation for oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures: a narrative review

  • Seung-Hwa Ryoo (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Seoul National University, School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kyung Nam Park (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Seoul National University, School of Dentistry) ;
  • Myong-Hwan Karm (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Seoul National University, School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2023.12.22
  • Accepted : 2024.01.25
  • Published : 2024.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The video laryngoscope is a novel instrument for intubation that enables indirect visualization of the upper airway. It is recognized for its ability to enhance Cormack-Lehane grades in the management of difficult airways. Notably, video laryngoscopy is associated with equal or higher rates of intubation success within a shorter time frame than direct laryngoscopy. Video laryngoscopy facilitates faster and easier visualization of the glottis and reduces the need for Magill forceps, thereby shortening the intubation time. Despite the advanced glottic visualization afforded by video laryngoscopy, nasotracheal tube insertion and advancement occasionally fail. This is particularly evident during nasotracheal intubation, where oropharyngeal blood or secretions may obstruct the visual field on the monitor, thereby complicating video laryngoscopy. Moreover, the use of Magill forceps is markedly challenging or nearly unfeasible in this context, especially in pediatric cases. Furthermore, the substantial blade size of video laryngoscopes may restrict their applicability in individuals with limited oral apertures. This study aimed to review the literature on video laryngoscopy, discuss its clinical role in nasotracheal intubation, and address the challenges that anesthesiologists may encounter during the intubation process.

Keywords

References

  1. Hall CE, Shutt LE. Nasotracheal intubation for head and neck surgery. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 249-56.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03034.x
  2. Pieters BM, Eindhoven GB, Acott C, van Zundert AA. Pioneers of laryngoscopy: indirect, direct and video laryngoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2015; 43 Suppl: 4-11.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X150430S103
  3. Henderson J. Airway Management in the Adult. In: Miller's Anaesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone Elsevier. 2010, pp 1573-1610. 
  4. Kaplan MB, Ward DS, Berci G. A new video laryngoscope-an aid to intubation and teaching. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 620-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180(02)00457-9
  5. Cavus E, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V, Moeller T, Thee C, Wagner K. The c-mac videolaryngoscope: First experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 473-7.  https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c5bce5
  6. De Jong A, Molinari N, Conseil M, Coisel Y, Pouzeratte Y, Belafia F, et al. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 629-39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3236-5
  7. Huang HB, Peng JM, Xu B, Liu GY, Du B. Video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation of critically ill adults: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2017; 152: 510-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.06.012
  8. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11: Cd011136. 
  9. van Zundert A, Pieters B, Doerges V, Gatt S. Videolaryngoscopy allows a better view of the pharynx and larynx than classic laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 1014-5.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes418
  10. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, et al. 2022 american society of anesthesiologists practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway*. Anesthesiology 2022; 136: 31-81.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002
  11. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, Mendonca C, Bhagrath R, Patel A, et al. Difficult airway society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults†. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia 2015; 115: 827-48.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev371
  12. Kwak HJ, Lee SY, Lee SY, Cho SH, Kim HS, Kim JY. Mcgrath video laryngoscopy facilitates routine nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparison with macintosh laryngoscopy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74: 256-61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.07.021
  13. Gupta N, Gupta A, Sarma R, Batra A, Madan K. Video laryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in oromaxillofacial surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Korean J Anesthesiol 2021; 74: 439-48.  https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.21234
  14. McNarry AF, Patel A. The evolution of airway management - new concepts and conflicts with traditional practice. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119: i154-i66.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex385
  15. Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D. Case series: the mcgrath videolaryngoscope--an initial clinical evaluation. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 307-13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03022777
  16. Agro F, Barzoi G, Montecchia F. Tracheal intubation using a macintosh laryngoscope or a glidescope in 15 patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 705-6.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg560
  17. Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T. Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 1050-61.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02285.x
  18. Asai T. Videolaryngoscopes: Do they truly have roles in difficult airways? Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 515-7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318246e866
  19. Pieters BMA, Maas EHA, Knape JTA, van Zundert AAJ. Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy use by experienced anaesthetists in patients with known difficult airways: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 1532-41.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14057
  20. Maharaj CH, O'Croinin D, Curley G, Harte BH, Laffey JG. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the airtraq or the macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomised, controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 1093-9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04819.x
  21. Dhonneur G, Ndoko S, Amathieu R, Housseini LE, Poncelet C, Tual L. Tracheal intubation using the airtraq in morbid obese patients undergoing emergency cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 629-30.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200703000-00027
  22. Suzuki A, Toyama Y, Katsumi N, Kunisawa T, Sasaki R, Hirota K, et al. The pentax-aws((r)) rigid indirect video laryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 641-7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05452.x
  23. Suzuki A, Abe N, Sasakawa T, Kunisawa T, Takahata O, Iwasaki H. Pentax-aws (airway scope) and airtraq: Big difference between two similar devices. J Anesth 2008; 22: 191-2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-007-0603-1
  24. Hirabayashi Y, Seo N. Airway scope: Early clinical experience in 405 patients. J Anesth 2008; 22: 81-5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-007-0580-4
  25. Latimer AJ, Harrington B, Counts CR, Ruark K, Maynard C, Watase T, et al. Routine use of a bougie improves first-attempt intubation success in the out-of-hospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 2021; 77: 296-304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.10.016
  26. Saracoglu KT, Yilmaz M, Turan AZ, Saracoglu A, Kus A, Alparslan V, et al. Evaluation of rescue techniques following failed laryngoscopy: a multicenter prospective observational study. North Clin Istanb 2023; 10: 212-21. 
  27. Reed MJ, Dunn MJ, McKeown DW. Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department? Emerg Med J 2005; 22: 99-102.  https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2003.008771
  28. Kj D, Shekar B. Adverse events in failed first-pass intubation vs. successful first-pass intubation in the emergency department - an analytical hospital-based study. J Evid Based Med Healthc 2021; 8: 283-7.  https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2021/55
  29. Pacheco GS, Hurst NB, Patanwala AE, Hypes C, Mosier JM, Sakles JC. First pass success without adverse events is reduced equally with anatomically difficult airways and physiologically difficult airways. West J Emerg Med 2021; 22: 360-8.  https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.10.48887
  30. Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 607-13, table of contents.  https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15
  31. Xue F, Zhang G, Liu J, Li X, Sun H, Wang X, et al. A clinical assessment of the glidescope videolaryngoscope in nasotracheal intubation with general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2006; 18: 611-5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.03.018
  32. Cook TM. A new practical classification of laryngeal view. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 274-9.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01270.x
  33. Levitan RM, Heitz JW, Sweeney M, Cooper RM. The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 57: 240-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.035
  34. Lafferty BD, Ball DR, Williams D. Videolaryngoscopy as a new standard of care. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 136-7.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev193
  35. Chung YT, Sun MS, Wu HS. Blind nasotracheal intubation is facilitated by neutral head position and endotracheal tube cuff inflation in spontaneously breathing patients. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50: 511-3.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03021066
  36. Lin CH, Tseng KY, Su MP, Chuang WM, Hu PY, Cheng KI. Cuff inflation technique is better than magill forceps technique to facilitate nasotracheal intubation guiding by glidescopeⓇ video laryngoscope. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2022; 38: 796-803.  https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12559
  37. Manabe Y, Iwamoto S, Seto M, Sugiyama K. Appropriate head position for nasotracheal intubation by using lightwand device (trachlight). Anesth Prog 2014; 61: 47-52.  https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-61.2.47
  38. Russell T, Khan S, Elman J, Katznelson R, Cooper R. Measurement of forces applied during macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with glidescopeⓇ videolaryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 626-31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07087.x
  39. Paix AD, Williamson JA, Runciman WB. Crisis management during anaesthesia: difficult intubation. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: e5. 
  40. Yao WL, Wan L, Xu H, Qian W, Wang XR, Tian YK, Zhang CH. A comparison of the mcgrathⓇ series 5 videolaryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tracheal tube placement in patients with a good glottic view at direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 810-7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13040
  41. Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of macintosh, truview evo2Ⓡ, glidescopeⓇ, and airwayscopeⓇ laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 723-30.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen231
  42. Asai T, Liu EH, Matsumoto S, Hirabayashi Y, Seo N, Suzuki A, et al. Use of the pentax-awsⓇ in 293 patients with difficult airways. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 898-904.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819c45e5
  43. Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, Borgers A, Groeben H. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 546-50.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep013
  44. Puchner W, Drabauer L, Kern K, Mayer C, Bierbaumer J, Rehak PH, et al. Indirect versus direct laryngoscopy for routine nasotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth 2011; 23: 280-5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.10.003
  45. Jiang J, Ma DX, Li B, Wu AS, Xue FS. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Anesth 2019; 52: 6-16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.08.029
  46. Zhu H, Liu J, Suo L, Zhou C, Sun Y, Jiang H. A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, mcgrath mac video laryngoscope and macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19: 166. 
  47. Sato Boku A, Sobue K, Kako E, Tachi N, Okumura Y, Kanazawa M, et al. The usefulness of the mcgrath mac laryngoscope in comparison with airwayscope and macintosh laryngoscope during routine nasotracheal intubation: a randomaized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2017; 17: 160. 
  48. Lambert RC, Ban C, Rivera AU, Eckert GJ, Krishnan DG, Bennett JD. Comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in intubating a mannequin: Should video laryngoscopy be available to manage airway emergencies in the oral and maxillofacial surgery office? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73: 1901-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.056
  49. Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. GlidescopeⓇ video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 41-52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-011-9620-5
  50. Taylor AM, Peck M, Launcelott S, Hung OR, Law JA, MacQuarrie K, et al. The mcgrathⓇ series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 142-7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12075
  51. Noppens RR, Mobus S, Heid F, Schmidtmann I, Werner C, Piepho T. Evaluation of the mcgrath series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 716-20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06388.x
  52. Suzuki A, Onodera Y, Mitamura SM, Mamiya K, Kunisawa T, Takahata O, et al. Comparison of the pentax-aws airway scope with the macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation: a randomized, prospective study. J Clin Anesth 2012; 24: 561-5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.04.007
  53. Asai T. Pentax-aws videolaryngoscope for awake nasal intubation in patients with unstable necks. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 108-11.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep316
  54. Aikins NL, Ganesh R, Springmann KE, Lunn JJ, Solis-Keus J. Difficult airway management and the novice physician. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2010; 3: 9-12.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.58668
  55. Mazzinari G, Rovira L, Henao L, Ortega J, Casasempere A, Fernandez Y, et al. Effect of dynamic versus stylet-guided intubation on first-attempt success in difficult airways undergoing glidescope laryngoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2019; 128. 
  56. Park JW, Kim SY, Kim JW, Hong DY, Lee KR, Baek KJ, et al. A study of comparing the first-attempt success of endotracheal intubation and complication rates between glidescope video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2021; 32: 11-8. 
  57. Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 71-8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12055
  58. Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, et al. The intubation difficulty scale (ids) proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1290-7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199712000-00005
  59. Howard-Quijano KJ, Huang YM, Matevosian R, Kaplan MB, Steadman RH. Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 568-72.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen211
  60. Yong SA, Chaou CH, Yu SR, Kuan JT, Lin CC, Liu HP, et al. Video assisted laryngoscope facilitates intubation skill learning in the emergency department. J Acute Med 2020; 10: 60-9. 
  61. Lee JK, Kang H, Choi HJ. Changes in the first-pass success rate with the glidescope video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope: a ten-year observational study in two academic emergency departments. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2016; 3: 213-8.  https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.16.148
  62. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the fourth national audit project of the royal college of anaesthetists and the difficult airway society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 617-31.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer058
  63. Kheterpal S, Healy D, Aziz MF, Shanks AM, Freundlich RE, Linton F, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiology 2013; 119: 1360-9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000435832.39353.20
  64. Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 33-9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200507000-00009
  65. Giraudon A, de Saint Maurice G, Biais M, Benhamou D, Nouette-Gaulain K. Dental injury associated with anaesthesia: an 8-year database analysis of 592 claims from a major french insurance company. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2018; 37: 49-53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2017.04.007
  66. Tan Y, Loganathan N, Thinn KK, Liu EHC, Loh NW. Dental injury in anaesthesia: a tertiary hospital's experience. BMC Anesthesiology 2018; 18: 108. 
  67. Kato Y, Sakuma Y, Momota Y. Comparison of the contact force exerted on teeth by conventional macintosh laryngoscope versus video laryngoscopes. Anesth Prog 2018; 65: 151-5.  https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-65-03-01
  68. Mosier JM, Whitmore SP, Bloom JW, Snyder LS, Graham LA, Carr GE, et al. Video laryngoscopy improves intubation success and reduces esophageal intubations compared to direct laryngoscopy in the medical intensive care unit. Crit Care 2013; 17: R237. 
  69. Sakles JC, Javedani PP, Chase E, Garst-Orozco J, Guillen-Rodriguez JM, Stolz U. The use of a video laryngoscope by emergency medicine residents is associated with a reduction in esophageal intubations in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22: 700-7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12674
  70. Jiang J, Kang N, Li B, Wu AS, Xue FS. Comparison of adverse events between video and direct laryngoscopes for tracheal intubations in emergency department and icu patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020; 28: 10. 
  71. Chandradeva K, Harshan D. The role of the hyperangulated videolaryngoscope in nasotracheal intubation. Saudi J Anaesth 2020; 14: 549-50.  https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_811_19
  72. Pham Q, Lentner M, Hu A. Soft palate injuries during orotracheal intubation with the videolaryngoscope. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2017; 126: 132-7.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489416678008
  73. Thorley DS, Simons AR, Mirza O, Malik V. Palatal and retropharyngeal injury secondary to intubation using the glidescopeⓇ video laryngoscope. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2015; 97: e67-9. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588415X14181254789727