문화기술의 융합 (The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology)

  • 제10권1호
  • /
  • Pages.245-252
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2384-0358(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0366(eISSN)
국제문화기술진흥원 (The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

럭셔리 패션 브랜드의 지속가능 마케팅에서 메시지 프레이밍 유형이 지각된 소비자 효과성과 브랜드 신뢰에 미치는 영향 연구

A Study on the Message Framing Types of Sustainable Marketing Campaigns of Luxury Impacting Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Brand Trust

  • 김민정 (국민대학교 디자인대학원 럭셔리 패션전공) ;
  • 이은정 (국민대학교 조형대학 의상디자인학과)
  • 투고 : 2023.10.05
  • 심사 : 2023.11.10
  • 발행 : 2024.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 럭셔리 패션 브랜드의 소셜미디어 지속가능 마케팅의 메시지 프레이밍 유형이 소비자의 브랜드 신뢰에 미치는 영향에 있어 지각된 소비자 효과성이라는 개인의 인지적 특성이 갖는 상호작용적 관계를 규명하고자 하였다. 연구 결과, 럭셔리 패션 브랜드의 메시지 프레이밍 유형은 소비자로 하여금 지각된 소비자 효과성을 높였으며, 수용자의 지각된 소비자 효과성은 각각 해당 브랜드에 대한 소비자의 신뢰를 형성하는데 영향을 주는 것이 확인되었다. 단 메시지 프레이밍 유형은 소비자가 지각하는 브랜드 신뢰에는 유의한 영향을 미치지 않았다. 이러한 연구 결과 럭셔리 패션 브랜드의 메시지 프레임이 직접적으로도 소비자의 브랜드 신뢰를 형성하는데 있어 긍정적 효과를 불러일으킨다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

This study sought to identify the interactive relationship between the individual cognitive characteristics of perceived consumer effectiveness and the impact of the message framing type of a fashion brand's sustainable marketing on consumers' brand trust. As a result of the study, it was confirmed that the fashion brand's message framing type increased consumers' perceived consumer effectiveness, and that the recipient's perceived consumer effectiveness each influenced the formation of consumers' trust in the brand. It was confirmed that the fashion brand's message frame directly had a positive effect in forming consumers' brand trust.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim, J. H., & Zhang, B.(2015). Attitude and purchase intent for fashion goods: Cultural differences between Americans and Chinese. International Journal of Costume and Fashion, 15(1), 19-37.
  2. Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., Korschun, D., & Romani, S.(2018). Consumers' perceptions of luxury brands'CSR initiatives: An investigation of the role of status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.111
  3. Shen, B., Zheng, J. H., Chow, P. S., & Chow, K. Y.(2014). Perception of fashion sustainability in online community. The Journal of the textile institute, 105(9), 971-979.
  4. Chang, H., Zhang, L., & Xie, G.(2015). Message framing in green advertising: The effect of construal level and consumer environmental concern. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 158176.
  5. Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S.(2014). Exploring postconsumption guilt and pride in the context of sustainability. Psychology & Marketing, 31(9), 717735.
  6. Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z.(2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3, 128143.
  7. Streiner, D. L.(2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
  8. Karaosman, H., Perry, P., Brun, A., & Morales-Alonso, G.(2020). Behind the runway: Extending sustainability in fashion supply chains. Journal of Business Research, 117(September), 652-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.09.017
  9. Sung, Y., Choi, S. M., Ahn, H., & Song, Y. A.(2015). Dimensions of luxury brand personality: Scale development and validation. Psychology & Marketing, 32(1), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20767
  10. Jestratijevic, I., Rudd, N.A., & Uanhoro, J. (2020). Transparency of sustainability disclosures among luxury and mass-market fashion brands. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 11(2), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2019.1708774
  11. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.(1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
  12. Lazarus, J.(2021). Negativity bias: An evolutionary hypothesis and an empirical programme. Learning and Motivation, 75(Aug), 101731.
  13. Koh, A.R. & Noh, J.(2009). Ethical fashion consumer behavior in Korea - Factors influencing ethical fashion consumption. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(12), .1956-1964. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.12.1956
  14. Berger, I.E., & Corbin, R.M.(1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569201100208
  15. Thompson, S. C.(1981). Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.89
  16. Kinnear, T. C., Taylor, J. R., & Ahmed, S. A.(1974). Ecologically concerned consumers: Who are they?: Ecologically concerned consumers CAN be identified. Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 20-24.
  17. Cojuharenco, I., Shteynberg, G., Gelfand, M. & Schminke, M.(2012). Self-construal and unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics. 109, 447-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1139-8
  18. Antonetti, P., Maklan, S.(2014). Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1841-9
  19. Jaiswal, D., & Singh, B.(2018). Toward sustainable consumption: Investigating the determinants of green buying behaviour of Indian consumers. Business Strategy and Development, 1(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.12
  20. Arminda Maria Finisterra do Paco and Rosa Reis(2012). Factors affecting skepticism toward green advertising. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.10672463
  21. Morgan, R.M., & Hunt, S.D.(1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302
  22. Bae,G., Lee, S., & Luan, B. (2023). The impact of ESG on brand trust and word of mouth in food and beverage companies: Focusing on Jeju Island tourists,Sustainability, 15(3), 2348.
  23. Cho, Y.N., & Taylor, C.R.(2020). The role of ambiguity and skepticism in the effectiveness of sustainability labeling. Journal of Business Research, 120(Nov), 379-388.
  24. Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., Van Heerde, H. J., & Geyskens, I.(2010). What makes consumers willing to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1011-1024. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.6.1011
  25. Meyerowitz, B.E., & Chaiken, S.(1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500-510. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.500
  26. Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The Role of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness in Motivating Environmentally Conscious Behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101000206
  27. White, K., Macdonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It's the Mind-Set That Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(June), 472-485.
  28. Pam, E., Wiener, J., & Cobb-Walgren, C.(1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 10. 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101000206
  29. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. et al.(2010). Multivariate Data Analysis(7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.