Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding the Urban-wall's Significance in the Transit-centric Axis of the Multi-functional Administrative City

행정중심복합도시 대중교통중심축의 가로벽 의미 해석 연구

  • Park, Yong-Kuk (Planning and Coordination Division, Multi-functional Administrative City, Korea Planners Association)
  • 박용국 (KPA 행정중심복합도시 기획조정단)
  • Received : 2023.07.25
  • Accepted : 2023.11.29
  • Published : 2024.01.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the early stages of the multi-functional administrative city, the view for the urban-wall stood as a city-image symbol, embodying integrated design and urban concepts. However, subsequent regulations, conflicts with development interests, and various discrepancies in the development process have brought design guideline and operational system issues to the forefront. This study aims to classify city-image elements based on conceptual and spatial characteristics within spaces formed by the urban-wall along the circular public transportation axis to implement an integrated image. It also seeks to interpret their purpose and value in terms of cognitive aspects. In the evolving stages of urban development, the multi-functional administrative city is transitioning from the second stage of self-sufficiency maturity to the completion stage. At this point, with fundamental conditions completed in development, the aim is to reassess and establish the identity of multi-functional administrative city images, promote urban principles, and enhance values.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashihara, Y. (1983). Exterior design in Architecture (Kim,J.D, Trans.), Seoul :Kimoondang(Original work published 1918), 50-54.
  2. AURI. (2017). Rethinking "Urban Wall" Design Guidelines of Administrative City in Sejong : Issues and Future Directions, 3-5.
  3. District Unit Plan Guideline in the Administrative City, (2023). https://www.happycity2030.or.kr/
  4. Hays, M. (2010), Architecture theory since 1968. (Bong, I.B, Trans.). Seoul: Spacetime(Original work publ ished 2000), 252.
  5. Jacobs, J. (2010). The Death and Life of Great Ameri can Cities.(Yoo,K.E, Trans.), Seoul: greenbee(Original work published 1961), 29.
  6. Jeong, S. G., & Shin, N. S. (2001). Correlation analysis bet ween spatial conciousness and physical elements in streets, Architectural Institute of Korea, 17(10), 183.
  7. Kim, C. S. (2006). Understanding of Urban Space, Kimoon dang, 209.
  8. Kim, C. S. (2014a). Site Plan, Kimoondang, 52.
  9. Kim, D. W., & Song, D. H. (2014). A Study on the Improve ment of the Upper Floor Landscape in Urban Street Building, thesis, Department of Architectural Engineering, Pukyung National University, 14.
  10. Kim, H. B., Yoon, S. B., & Yoon, H. M. (2007). The City Im age Analysis for City Identity Enhancement, Journal of Korean Data Analysis Society, 9(6), 3065.
  11. Kim, S. D. (2014b). Theory of Urban Anthropology, Ahngra phics, 549.
  12. Lee, S. H., & Lee, D. E. (2003). A Critical Review on C.Norberg Schulz's Theory of the 'Placeness', Architectural Institute of Korea, 3(12), 149.
  13. Lee, S. M. (2006). A Study on the Ground&Figure in Gestalt Psychology, 7(2), Journal of Basic Design & Art, Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 250.
  14. L H. (2020). A Study on 7 Strategic Projects Reviews and Improvement Plan for Urban Landscape of Administrative City, Korea Land & Housing corporation, 2-35.
  15. L H. (2015). Design guidelines of 3-3 Commercial Facility in Administrative City, 35.
  16. L H. (2016). Design guidelines of 4-1 Commercial Facility in Administrative City, 59.
  17. L H. (2013). General management for Establishing a Di strict units plan and forming an integrated image for Multi-functional Administrative City, Korea Land & Housing corporation, 51-89.
  18. L H. (2007). Integrated Image Building Plan for Multifunctional Administrative City, 69-75.
  19. Lim, K. T. (2014). Philosophy and Architecture series;3, Spacetime, 92-93.
  20. Lim, Y. K., & Byun, N. H. (2017). Rethinking "Urban Wall" Design Guidelines of Administrative City in Sejong, AURI, 14.
  21. Lim, Y. K., Seong, E. Y., & Lim, K. R. (2015). Making Stre ets for people : Urban Design Issues, AURI, 24.
  22. MAC. (2007). Research on Architectural Aesthetic stand ards for Multi-functional Administrative City, 155.
  23. Oh, C. H., Kim, E. H., & Seo, S. J. (2011). A Study on the Residential Renewal to respond to Urban Spatial Tissue, AURI, 14.
  24. Oh, J. G. (2018). The Theory of City-Congnition, Book korea, 36-53.
  25. Sitte, C. (2023). DER STADTEBAU NACH SEINEN KuNSTLERISCHEN GRUNDSATZEN.(Kim,K.J, Trans.), Seoul: Mijinsa(Original work published 1889), 40-47.
  26. Song, D. H., & Yoon, J. G. (2007). A Theory of Landscape Design in Urban Architecture, PAL; Publisher, 21-151.
  27. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (2008). Plan and Managements of Urban Landscapes, Munun dang, 25.
  28. Trancik, R. (1992). Finding Lost Space ; Theories, History, Methodology of Urban Design. Jipmunsa (Lee, G.U, Trans.), (Original work published 1986), 10.
  29. Yoon, T. W. (2016). City primary principles of Admini strative City in Korea, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 17(8), 688.