DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

임플란트 고정성 보철물 사이에서의 인접면 접촉상실: 증례보고

Interproximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses: a clinical report

  • 박연희 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 김경아 (건양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 이정진 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 서재민 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Yeon-Hee Park (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University - Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Kyoung-A Kim (Department of Dentistry, Daejeon Konyang Medical Center, Konyang University, School of Medicine) ;
  • Jung-Jin Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University - Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Jae-Min Seo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University - Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.29
  • 심사 : 2023.10.10
  • 발행 : 2024.01.31

초록

부분 무치악 환자가 임플란트 고정성 보철물 치료를 받은 경우 interproximal contact loss (ICL)은 가장 빈번하게 발생하는 합병증이다. 일반적으로 보고되는 임플란트 보철물의 ICL은 자연치의 이동에 따른 임플란트 보철물과 자연치 사이에서 발생하는 경우가 대부분이다. 임플란트 보철물과 자연치 사이에서 발생하는 ICL의 원인은 여러가지가 있다. 임플란트 보철물 사이에서 발생하는 ICL에 대한 보고는 거의 없으며, 이는 임플란트 보철물과 자연치 사이에서 발생하는 ICL의 원인만으로는 설명하기 어렵다. 본 증례에서는 임플란트 보철물 사이에서 발생하는 ICL을 증례보고하고, 이에 대한 원인 및 대처방법을 논의하고자 한다.

Interproximal contact loss (ICL) is the most frequent complication in partially edentulous patients treated with implant-supported prostheses. However, in most cases, ICL occurs between the implant prosthesis and the natural tooth due to the movement of the natural tooth. There are several causes of ICL that occur between an implant prosthesis and a natural tooth. There are only a few reported cases of ICL occurring between implant prostheses, and explaining the causes of ICL between implant prostheses and natural teeth is challenging. This clinical report describes cases of ICL between implant prostheses and discusses its causes and countermeasures.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Byun SJ, Heo SM, Ahn SG, Chang M. Analysis of proximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and adjacent teeth in relation to influential factors and effects. A cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:709-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12373
  2. Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T, Hammerle CHF. Frequency of infraposition and missing contact points in implant-supported restorations within natural dentitions over time: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:309-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13291
  3. French D, Naito M, Linke B. Interproximal contact loss in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 4325 implants: Distribution and incidence and the effect on bone loss and peri-implant soft tissue. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:108-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.011
  4. Wei H, Tomotake Y, Nagao K, Ichikawa T. Implant prostheses and adjacent tooth migration: preliminary retrospective survey using 3-dimensional occlusal analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:302-4.
  5. Koori H, Morimoto K, Tsukiyama Y, Koyano K. Statistical analysis of the diachronic loss of interproximal contact between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:535-40.
  6. Wong AT, Wat PY, Pow EH, Leung KC. Proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:e68-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12353
  7. Saber A, Chakar C, Mokbel N, Nohra J. Prevalence of interproximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth and its impact on marginal bone loss: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2020;35:625-30. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7926
  8. Varthis S, Randi A, Tarnow DP. Prevalence of interproximal open contacts between single-implant restorations and adjacent teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:1089-92. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4432
  9. Wat PY, Wong AT, Leung KC, Pow EH. Proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00174-5
  10. Kaplan P. Drifting, tipping, supraeruption, and segmental alveolar bone growth. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:280-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90305-1
  11. Southard TE, Behrents RG, Tolley EA. The anterior component of occlusal force. Part 2. Relationship with dental malalignment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:41-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81707-X
  12. Moss JP, Picton DC. Short-term changes in the mesiodistal position of teeth following removal of approximal contacts in the monkey Macaca fascicularis. Arch Oral Biol 1982;27:273-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(82)90062-0
  13. Greenstein G, Carpentieri J, Cavallaro J. Open contacts adjacent to dental implant restorations: Etiology, incidence, consequences, and correction. J Am Dent Assoc 2016;147:28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2015.06.011
  14. Eissmann HF, Radke RA, Noble WH. Physiologic design criteria for fixed dental restorations. Dent Clin North Am 1971;15:543-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01473-2
  15. Kasahara K, Miura H, Kuriyama M, Kato H, Hasegawa S. Observations of interproximal contact relations during clenching. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:289-94.
  16. Newell DH, John V, Kim SJ. A technique of occlusal adjustment for food impaction in the presence of tight proximal contacts. Oper Dent 2002;27:95-100.
  17. Ren S, Lin Y, Hu X, Wang Y. Changes in proximal contact tightness between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth: a 1-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:437-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.018
  18. Vardimon AD, Beckmann S, Shpack N, Sarne O, Brosh T. Posterior and anterior components of force during bite loading. J Biomech 2007;40:820-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.03.009
  19. Daftary F, Mahallati R, Bahat O, Sullivan RM. Lifelong craniofacial growth and the implications for osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:163-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2827
  20. Oesterle LJ, Cronin RJ Jr. Adult growth, aging, and the single-tooth implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:252-60.