Journal of Research and Publication Ethics (연구윤리)

Korea Distribution Science Association (한국유통과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Research Ethics and Education for Aviation Tourism Researchers

  • Hye-Yoon PARK (Department of Aviation Tourism, Hanseo University) ;
  • Soo-Myung WANG (Department of Airline Service, Don Seoul University)
  • Received : 2024.02.13
  • Accepted : 2024.03.05
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Compared to the research results that have achieved remarkable growth, research ethics problems that threaten the quality of research. This issue appears not only in Korea but also in research societies worldwide where research competition has risen This study attempted to prepare improvements and institutional implications to establish research ethics in the research field. Research Design, data and methodology: This study examined total 26 prior studies to examine the current status of aviation tourism research ethics in the literature reviews for the finding section. The procedure of data obtaining included the elimination process to screen dissertation papers, conference papers, and internet sources. Results: Researchers must have an institutional mechanism to publish papers after completing education. Research ethics education programs suitable for aviation tourism research should be developed and detailed and clear guidelines for research ethics should be provided. This can prevent research irregularities. Conclusions: It is necessary to create a clear research ethics education for the spread of positive research ethics on aviation tourism researchers. Develop research ethics education and complete long-term compulsory education. Establish a research culture that requires compulsory completion of research education. It is necessary to support continuous education and learning through various research ethics methods.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrizah, A., Shah, N. A. K., & Nicholas, D. (2019). Malaysian early career researchers on the ethics of scholarly publishing. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 24(1), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no1.5
  2. Anabo, I. F., Elexpuru-Albizuri, I., & Villardon-Gallego, L. (2019). Revisiting the Belmont Report's ethical principles in internetmediated research: Perspectives from disciplinary associations in the social sciences. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(2), 137-149.
  3. Bektasb, C., & Tayauova, G. (2019). Science Ethics and Social Responsibilities of Scientists. The Journal of International Scientific Researches, 4(2), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.23834/isrjournal.543510
  4. Bell, E., & Bryman, A. (2007). The ethics of management research: an exploratory content analysis. British journal of management, 18(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00487.x
  5. Boeckstyns, M. E., Giddins, G., Meals, R., & Tang, J. B. (2020). Publication ethics. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 45(7), 770-774. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193420905263
  6. Braun, D., & Guston, D. H. (2003). Principal-agent theory and research policy: an introduction. Science and public policy, 30(5), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780290
  7. Brown, N. (2023). Research ethics in a changing social sciences landscape. Research Ethics, 19(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221141011
  8. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2019). Ethics in business research. Oxford University Press.
  9. Dennis, S., Garrett, P., Yim, H., Hamm, J., Osth, A. F., Sreekumar, V., & Stone, B. (2019). Privacy versus open science. Behavior research methods, 51, 1839-1848.
  10. Gibson, S., Benson, O., & Brand, S. L. (2013). Talking about suicide: Confidentiality and anonymity in qualitative research. Nursing ethics, 20(1), 18-29, https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733012452684
  11. Husband, G. (2020). Ethical Data Collection and Recognizing the Impact of Semi-Structured Interviews on Research Respondents. Education Sciences, 10(8), 206.
  12. Hwang, H. J., Kim, D. H., Youn, M. K., Lee, J. W., & Lee, J. H. (2014). The Standard of Judgment on Plagiarism in Research Ethics and the Guideline of Global Journals for KODISA. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(6), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.15722/JDS.12.6.201406.15
  13. Hwang, H.J. (2022). Ethical Issues in Business Marketing. Research. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 3(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.15722/JRPE.3.2.202209.1
  14. Jacob, M. A. (2019). Under repair: A publication ethics and research record in the making. Social studies of science, 49(1), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718824663
  15. Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2020). The consequences of data fabrication and falsification among researchers. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 1(2), 7-10.
  16. Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2021). Ethical Concerns and Issues in the Publication Process. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 2(1), 7-12.
  17. Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2021). Ethical Conducts in Qualitative Research Methodology: Participant Observation and Interview Process. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 2(2), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.15722/JRPE.2.2.202109.5
  18. Kang, E.G., & Hwang, H.J. (2023). The Importance of Anonymity and Confidentiality for Conducting Survey. Research. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 4(1), 1-7.
  19. Kant, S. (2022). Publication ethics. Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine, 8(2), 86.
  20. Kim, D.G & Kim, H.S. (2014). In the study of sports science Issues and Challenges of Bioethics. Journal of Korean Philosophic Society for Sport and Dance, 22(4), 94-115.
  21. Novak, A. (2014). Anonymity, confidentiality, privacy, and identity: The ties that bind and break in communication research. Review of communication, 14(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2014.942351
  22. Olatunji, P. O. (2021). Research and Publication Ethics. Annals of Health Research, 7(3), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.30442/ahr.0703-01-130
  23. Plutzer, E. (2019). Publication ethics, transparency, and replication: New policies at POQ. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(2), 309- 312. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz028
  24. Sunandini, M. (2021). Research and Publication Ethics: Exploring the Role and Responsibilities of Socio-Legal Researchers. Supremo Amicus, 27, 306.
  25. Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative research: Data collection, analysis, and management. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 68(3), 226-231.
  26. Vainio, A. (2013). Beyond research ethics: Anonymity as 'ontology','analysis' and 'independence'. Qualitative Research, 13(6), 685-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112459669
  27. Youn, M. K. Lee, J. H. Kim, Y. E. Yang, H. C., Hwang, H. J., Kim, D. H., & Lee, J. W. (2015). KODISA Journals and Strategies. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(3), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.15722/JDS.13.3.201503.5