DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of heat stress on performance, physiological parameters, and blood profiles of early-fattening Hanwoo steers in climate chambers

  • Jun Sik Woo (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Na Kyun Lee (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Hong Gu Lee (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Keun Kyu Park (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2023.07.22
  • Accepted : 2023.10.01
  • Published : 2024.01.01

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to assess effects of heat stress on growth performance, physiological parameters, and blood profiles of Hanwoo steers during early-fattening period in climate chambers. Methods: Four Hanwoo steers (body weight, 454.3±10.9 kg; age, 14±0.1 month) were allocated into four levels of temperature-humidity index (THI) in a 4×4 Latin square design for 21 days (pre-adaptation, 7 d; heat stress, 7 d; post-adaptation, 7 d) per period. Experimental treatments were assigned according to THI chart based on National Institute Animal Science (NIAS, 2022): Comfort (25.5℃ to 26.5℃, 60%; THI 73 to 75), Mild (28℃ to 29℃, 60%; THI 77 to 79), Moderate (29.5℃ to 30.5℃, 80%; THI 82 to 84), and Severe (31℃ to 32℃, 80%; THI 85 to 86) in separate climatic controlled chambers. Results: The dry matter intake (DMI) of the formula feed was lower in Severe compared to Mild and Comfort (p<0.05). The DMI of rice straw was the lowest in Severe and lower in Moderate than Comfort and Mild (p<0.05). Both average daily gain and feed conversion ratio of Severe and Moderate were lower than those of Mild and Comfort (p<0.05). Water intake was the highest in Severe and lower in Moderate compared with Comfort and Mild (p<0.05). Heart rate and rectal temperature increased as THI level increased (p<0.05). Glucose was the lowest in Severe and lower in Moderate compared to Comfort (p<0.05). On the contrary, non-esterified fatty acid was the highest in Severe and lower in Moderate compared with Comfort (p<0.05). Blood urea nitrogen of Moderate and Severe were higher than those of Comfort and Mild (p<0.05). Cortisol increased as THI increased (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrated the negative effects of heat stress on the performance and physiological responses of Hanwoo steers during the early-fattening period. In addition, it is judged that the THI chart for Hanwoo steers of National Institute of Animal Science (2022) was properly calculated.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by 'Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. RS-2020-RD009051)' Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415379 
  2. Hahn GL. Environmental management for improved livestock performance, health and well-being. Jpn J Livest Manag 1995; 30:113-27. https://doi.org/10.20652/kachikukanri.30.3_113 
  3. Rhoads ML, Rhoads RP, VanBaale MJ, et al. Effects of heat stress and plane of nutrition on lactating Holstein cows: I. Production, metabolism, and aspects of circulating somatotropin. J Dairy Sci 2009;92:1986-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1641 
  4. Brown-Brandl TM. Understanding heat stress in beef cattle. R Bras Zootec 2018;47:e20160414. https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4720160414 
  5. Hahn GL. Management and housing of farm animals in hot environments. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press Inc.; 1985. p. 151-74. 
  6. St-Pierre NR, Cobanov B, Schnitkey G. Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:E52-77. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74040-5 
  7. Thom EC. The discomfort index. Weatherwise 1959;12:57-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00431672.1959.9926960 
  8. Committee on Physiological Effects of Environmental Factors on Animals, Natioanl Research Council. A guide to environmental research on animals. Washington, DC, USA: National Academic of Science; 1971. 
  9. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2001. 
  10. Subcommitee on Environmental Stress, National Research Council. Effect of environment on nutrient requirements of domestic animals. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 1981. 
  11. Kim WS, Lee JS, Jeon SW, et al. Correlation between blood, physiological and behavioral parameters in beef calves under heat stress. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:919-25. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0545 
  12. Kim WS, Ghassemi Nejad J, Peng DQ, et al. Identification of heat shock protein gene expression in hair follicles as a novel indicator of heat stress in beef calves. Animal 2020;14:1502-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000075 
  13. Kim WS, Ghassemi Nejad J, Roh SG, Lee HG. Heat-shock proteins gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as an indicator of heat stress in beef calves. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050895 
  14. Kim WS, Peng DQ, Jo YH, Nejad JG, Lee HG. Responses of beef calves to long-term heat stress exposure by evaluating growth performance, physiological, blood and behavioral parameters. J Therm Biol 2021;100:103033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.103033 
  15. Kim WS, Ghassemi Nejad J, Peng DQ, Jo YH, Kim J, Lee HG. Effects of different protein levels on growth performance and stress parameters in beef calves under heat stress. Sci Rep 2022;12:8113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09982-4 
  16. Kang HJ, Piao MY, Lee IK, et al. Effects of ambient temperature and dietary glycerol addition on growth performance, blood parameters and immune cell populations of Korean cattle steers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:505-13. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0474 
  17. Kang HJ, Piao MY, Park SJ, Na SW, Kim HJ, Baik M. Effects of heat stress and rumen-protected fat supplementation on growth performance, rumen characteristics, and blood parameters in growing Korean cattle steers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2019;32:826-33. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0725 
  18. National Institute of Animal Science. Korean feeding standard for Hanwoo. 4th ed. Wanju, Korea; 2022. 
  19. National Institute of Animal Science. Korean feeding standard for Hanwoo. 3rd ed. Wanju, Korea; 2017. 
  20. Horwitz W, Latimer GW. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 21st ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC Interantional; 2019. 
  21. Kim BG, Stein HH. A spreadsheet program for making a balanced Latin square design. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2009;22:591-6. 
  22. Zimbelman RB, Rhoads RP, Rhoads ML, Duff GC, Baumgard LH, Collier RJ. A re-evaluation of the impact of temperature humidity index (THI) and black globe humidity index (BGHI) on milk production in high producing dairy cows. In: Proceedings of the Southwest Nutrition Conference; 2009. p. 158-69. 
  23. Conrad HR, Weiss WP, Odwongo WO, Shockey WL. Estimating net energy lactation from components of cell solubles and cell walls. J Dairy Sci 1984;67:427-36. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81320-X 
  24. O'Brien MD, Rhoads RP, Sanders SR, Duff GC, Baumgard LH. Metabolic adaptations to heat stress in growing cattle. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2010;38:86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2009.08.005 
  25. West JW. Effects of Heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:2131-44. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73803-x 
  26. Soriani N, Panella G, Calamari L. Rumination time during the summer season and its relationships with metabolic conditions and milk production. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:5082-94. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6620 
  27. Baile CA, Forbes JM. Control of feed intake and regulation of energy balance in ruminants. Physiol Rev 1974;54:160-214. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1974.54.1.160 
  28. Kurihara M, Kume SI, Takahashi S, Aii T. The effect of roughage type and environmental emperature on the energy metabolism of dry dairy cows at maintenance level of feeding. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho 1991;62:375-82. https://doi.org/10.2508/chikusan.62.375 
  29. Arias RA, Mader TL. Environmental factors affecting daily water intake on cattle finished in feedlots. J Anim Sci 2011;89:245-51. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3014 
  30. Vizzotto EF, Fischer V, Thaler Neto A, et al. Access to shade changes behavioral and physiological attributes of dairy cows during the hot season in the subtropics. Animal 2015;9:1559-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000877 
  31. Bernabucci U, Lacetera N, Danieli PP, et al. Influence of different periods of exposure to hot environment on rumen function and diet digestibility in sheep. Int J Biometeorol 2009;53:387-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0223-6 
  32. Zimbelman RB, Baumgard LH, Collier RJ. Effects of encapsulated niacin on evaporative heat loss and body temperature in moderately heat-stressed lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:2387-94. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2557 
  33. Abeni F, Calamari L, Stefanini L. Metabolic conditions of lactating Friesian cows during the hot season in the Po valley. 1. Blood indicators of heat stress. Int J Biometeorol 2007;52:87-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-007-0098-3 
  34. Baumgard LH, Rhoads Jr RP. Effects of heat stress on postabsorptive metabolism and energetics. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2013;1:311-37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevanimal-031412-103644 
  35. Kim WS, Nejad JG, Park KK, Lee HG. Heat stress effects on physiological and blood parameters, and behavior in early fattening stage of beef steers. Animals (Basel) 2023;13:1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071130 
  36. Bristow DJ, Holmes DS. Cortisol levels and anxiety-related behaviors in cattle. Physiol Behav 2007;90:626-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.11.015 
  37. Mostl E, Palme R. Hormones as indicators of stress. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2002;23:67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-7240(02)00146-7