대한심미치과학회지 (Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry)

대한심미치과학회 (Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

인접치 접촉 상실을 고려한 하악 제2대구치 단일 임플란트 보철물

Single Implant restoration on 2nd Mandibular molars regarding interproximal contact loss

  • 투고 : 2024.12.12
  • 심사 : 2024.12.27
  • 발행 : 2024.12.12
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

인접치 접촉 상실(ICL)은 임플란트 보철물 수복시 가장 흔히 나타나는 합병증이다 systematic review를 포함하여 최근 연구들에 따르면 ICL을 유발하는 정확한 이유는 알려지지 않았으나 이를 설명할 수 있는 새로운 가설들이 대두되고 있다. 물론 이 가설들을 뒷받침할 수 있는 추가적인 연구가 필요하다.

Purpose: Interproximal contact loss (ICL) is one of the most common complications in dental implant prosthetics. According to recent studies, including systematic reviews, the exact cause of ICL remains unknown, but new hypotheses are emerging to shed light on the issue. Further research is needed to support these findings.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Pappous GC, Campbell S, Goldstein G. Risk factors contributing to interproximal contact loss between an implant crown and a natural tooth. J Prosthodont. 2024 Dec 5. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13992.
  2. Goldstein G, Goodacre C, Brown MS, Tarnow DP. Proposal regarding potential causes related to certain complications with dental implants and adjacent natural teeth: Physics applied to prosthodontics. J Prosthodont. 2024 Mar 21. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13843.
  3. Ren S, Lin Y, Hu X, Wang Y. Changes in proximal contact tightness between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth: A 1-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr;115(4):437-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.018
  4. Mehanna S, Habre-Hallage P. Proximal contact alterations between implant-supported restorations and adjacent teeth in the posterior region: A 3-month prospective study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May 1;13(5):e479-e486. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.57802
  5. Misch CE, Bides MW. Implant-protected occlusion. Int J Dent Symp. 1994;2(1):32-7.
  6. Yongsik Kim, Tae-Ju Oh, Carl E Misch, Hom-Lay Wang. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Feb;16(1):26-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01067.x
  7. LeeJH, Kweon HH, Choi SH, etal. Association between dentalimplants inthe posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adiacent premolars: along-term follow-upclinicalandradiographic analysis. J Periodontal ImplantSci.2016;46:396-404. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.396
  8. BS Jeon, SK Kim, JJ Lee, JM Seo. Possibility and Limitation of Applying Occlusal Adjustment on Implant Prosthesis similar to Natural Teeth. The KAOMI Vol. 22, No. 3, 2018.
  9. Sarmad S Salih Al Qassar, Maria Mavragani, Vasilis Psarras, Demetrios J Halazonetis. The anterior component of occlusal force revisited: direct measurement and theoretical considerations. Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):190-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv028
  10. Yen JY, Kang L, Chou IC, Lai YL, Lee SY. Risk assessment of interproximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth: A retrospective radiographic study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.023
  11. T. Jemt, Measurements of tooth movements in relation to single-implant restorations during 16 years: a case report, Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 7 (2005) 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00065.x
  12. Oesterle LJ, Cronin RJ. Adult growth, aging, and the single-tooth implant Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Mar Apr;15(2):252-60.
  13. Greenstein G, Carpentieri J, Cavallaro J. Open contacts adjacent to dental implant restorations: Etiology, incidence, consequences, and correction J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Jan;147(1):28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2015.06.011
  14. Linkow L. Contact areas in natural dentition and fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Dent. 1962;12:132-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(62)90020-3
  15. Sheba M, Floriani F, Nimmo A, Ercoli C, Hosney S. Interproximal contact loss between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2024 Apr;33(4):313-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13780
  16. Manicone PF, De Angelis P, Rella E, Papetti L, D'Addona A. Proximal Contact Loss in Implant-Supported Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence. J Prosthodont. 2022 Mar;31(3):201-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13407
  17. Varthis S, Randi A, Tarnow DP. Prevalence of Interproximal Open Contacts Between Single-Implant Restorations and Adjacent Teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1089-92. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4432
  18. Pang NS, Suh CS, Kim KD, Park W, Jung BY. Prevalence of proximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent natural teeth and its associated factors: a 7-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Dec;28(12):1501-1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13018
  19. Saber A, Chakar C, Mokbel N, Nohra J. Prevalence of Interproximal Contact Loss Between Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses and Adjacent Teeth and Its impact on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 May/Jun;35(3):625-630. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7926
  20. Abduo J,Lau D. Proximal contact loss between implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: A qualitative systematic review ofprevalence, influencing factors and implications. Heliyon. 2022 Aug 1:8(8):e10064.