Journal of Practical Engineering Education (실천공학교육논문지)

Korean Institute for Pratical Engineering Education (한국실천공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study on Educational Effect and Operation of Blended Learning for Engineering Education

공학교육을 위한 블렌디드 러닝의 운영사례 및 교육효과 연구

  • Hyung-kun Park (Department of Electrical Electronic and Communication Eng. KOREATECH)
  • 박형근 (한국기술교육대학교 전기전자통신공학부)
  • Received : 2023.03.08
  • Accepted : 2023.03.17
  • Published : 2023.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the development of e-learning teaching methods, the demand for blended learning, which combines face-to-face education and e-learning, is increasing, and it shows a learning effect that can replace the existing face-to-face class. Engineering subjects have various learning activities such as practice, so it is not easy to operate them with traditional blended learning. Therefore, a different teaching and learning design is required according to the learning activities required for the subject. In this paper, examples of teaching method design and operation for blended learning in engineering subjects were introduced, and their effects investigated and analyzed. Learning activities were subdivided into theoretical classes, practical classes, quizzes and Q&A, assignments and solutions, and teaching and learning methods such as online videos, LMS utilization, and face-to-face classes were applied according to learning activities. According to the results of the student satisfaction survey, blended learning showed higher satisfaction than pure online and face-to-face classes in engineering subjects, and showed differentiated satisfaction for each learning activity.

이러닝 교수법의 발전에 따라 대면교육과 이러닝을 혼합한 블렌디드 러닝의 요구가 높아지고 있으며 기존의 대면수업을 대체할 만한 학습효과를 보여주고 있다. 그러나 공학 교과목은 실습과 같은 다양한 학습활동이 이루어지고 있어 기존의 전통적인 블렌디드 러닝으로 운영하기 쉽지 않다. 따라서 공학 교과목에 필요한 학습활동에 따라 기존과는 다른 교수학습설계가 필요로 된다. 본 논문에서는 공학교과목에서 블렌디드 러닝을 위해 교수법 설계 및 운영사례를 소개하고 그 효과를 조사 분석하였다. 학습활동을 이론수업, 실습수업, 퀴즈 및 질의응답, 과제수행 및 풀이 등으로 세분화하고 학습활동에 따라 온라인 동영상, LMS 활용, 대면수업의 교수 학습방법을 적용하였다. 학생들의 수업만족도 조사결과를 보면 공학교과목에서도 블렌디드 러닝은 순수온라인과 대면수업에 비해 만족도가 높게 나타났으며 학습활동별로 차별화된 만족도를 나타내었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2023년도 "한국기술교육대학교 교수 교육연구진흥과제" 지원에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. S. Bitter and G. Frankl, "Evaluation of blended learning courses: The assessment of the e-tutors," in Proceeding of the 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), Villach, Austria, pp. 1-6, 2012.
  2. O. Zvereva, R. Mukhamadiev, and D. Shadrin, "Blended learning in the IT educational programme: an example of the programming technologies course," in Proceeding of International Conference on Information Technologies in Engineering Education (Inforino), Moscow, Russia, pp. 1-6, 2022.
  3. H. Lee, "A study on the effectiveness the blended e-learning on teaching and learning of the engineering mathematics," Journal of Korean School Mathematics Society, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 395-413, December 2019. https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2019.22.4.003
  4. J. Lee, "A systematic review of flipped learning research in domestic engineering education," Journal of Engineering Education Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 21-31, May 2021. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2021.24.3.21
  5. X. Yang and W. Su, "Research and design of blended teaching mode based on smart learning environment," in proceeding of International Conference on Education, Information Management and Service Science (EIMSS), pp. 136-140, July 2021.
  6. S. Tikadar, S. Bhattacharya, and V. Tamarapalli, "A blended learning platform to improve teaching-learning experience," in Proceeding of International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 87-89, July 2018.
  7. Y. Wei, Y. Shi, H. H. Yang, and J. Liu, "Blended learning versus traditional learning: A study on students' learning achievements and academic press," in Proceeding of International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), pp. 219-223, June 2017.
  8. H. Hong, "The effect of self efficacy and self-regulated learning on learning persistence in blended learning based basic mathematics class," Journal of Engineering Education Research, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 3-11, 2017. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2017.20.6.3
  9. J. Huh and S. Jeong, "Effects of E-learning as a supplementary learning for basic fluid power practice," Journal of Practical Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 9-15, December 2010.
  10. S. Han, K. Rim, and S. Seong, "A study on the instructional design and application for non-face-to-face flipped-learning classes in University," Journal of Practical Engineering Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19-27, April 2021. https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2021.019
  11. J. Kim, K. Joo, and E. Jo, "Study on evaluation of e-learning education utilization in practical course," Journal of Practical Engineering Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25-33, April 2018.
  12. K. Andersen, G. Geirsdottir, S. E. Thorsteinsson, H. Thorbergsson, and K. S. Gudmundsson, "Engineering education case studies: engaging students in blended learning," in Proceeding of IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), pp. 203-206, July 2018.