DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of eye dominance on shade matching and color perception among the dentist population

  • Pattnaik Kalyani (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sriram Chandra Bhanja Dental College & Hospital) ;
  • Kannan Subiksha (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sriram Chandra Bhanja Dental College & Hospital) ;
  • Amit Jena (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sriram Chandra Bhanja Dental College & Hospital) ;
  • Govind Shashirekha (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be) University) ;
  • Saumyakanta Mohanty (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sriram Chandra Bhanja Dental College & Hospital) ;
  • Gaurav Sharma (Department of Public Health Dentistry, Sriram Chandra Bhanja Dental College & Hospital)
  • Received : 2023.06.16
  • Accepted : 2023.10.17
  • Published : 2023.11.30

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of eye dominance on color perception, and shade matching. Materials and Methods: A total of 104 participants were selected for the study. There were 3 groups: Group I: 3rd and 4th year dental students and interns (n = 40); Group II: postgraduates (n = 34); Group III: senior residents and faculty members (≥ 6 years of clinical experience) (n = 30). All participants were evaluated for congenital color blindness with Ishihara plates, their dominant eye with Mile's test, and their color perception with the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test. The shade guide test was used for shade matching with a second corresponding set of Vitapan classical shade guides. Results: The results of Mile's test revealed that 60.6% were right-eye dominant and 39.4% were left-eye dominant. There was a statistically significant difference among all participants between the dominant eye and the non-dominant eye in shade matching. Conclusions: The dominant eye has a positive effect on shade matching and the ability to match shades becomes better with an increase in clinical experience.

Keywords

References

  1. Imbery TA, Killough C, Baechle MA, Hankle JL, Janus C. An evaluation of factors affecting dental shade matching in first-year dental students. J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.030
  2. Ragain JC. A review of color science in dentistry: shade matching in the contemporary dental practice. J Dent Oral Disord Ther 2016;4:1-5. https://doi.org/10.15226/jdodt.2016.00156
  3. Ragain JC. A review of color science in dentistry: colorimetry and color space. J Dent Oral Disord Ther 2016;4:1-5. https://doi.org/10.15226/jdodt.2016.00148
  4. Ragain JC. A review of color science in dentistry: the process of color vision. J Dent Oral Disord Ther 2015;3:1-4. https://doi.org/10.15226/jdodt.2015.00134
  5. Elghorab HF, Hammad IA, Azer A, Nassif MA. The effect of eye dominance in color perception among dental students with normal color vision. Alex Dent J 2021;46:127-131.
  6. Carsten DL. Successful shade matching--what does it take? Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:175-178.
  7. Shinomori K. Ageing effects on colour vision-changed and unchanged perceptions. J Int Color Assoc 2005;8:7-12.
  8. Vadher R, Parmar G, Kanodia S, Chaudhary A, Kaur M, Savadhariya T. Basics of color in dentistry: a review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2014;13:78-85. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-13917885
  9. Sikri VK. Color: implications in dentistry. J Conserv Dent 2010;13:249-255. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.73381
  10. Dain SJ. Clinical colour vision tests. Clin Exp Optom 2004;87:276-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2004.tb05057.x
  11. Cardoso JA, Almeida PJ, Fischer A, Phaxay SL. Clinical decisions for anterior restorations: the concept of restorative volume. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:367-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2012.00503.x
  12. Aswini KK, Ramanarayanan V, Rejithan A, Sajeev R, Suresh R. The effect of gender and clinical experience on shade perception. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;31:608-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12520
  13. Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G, Borbely J, Vichi A, Dumfahrt H, et al. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality? J Dent 2009;37 Supplement 1:e40-e44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.012
  14. Yilmaz B, Irmak O, Yaman BC. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;31:500-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12507
  15. Capa N, Malkondu O, Kazazoglu E, Calikkocaoglu S. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:71-76. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0023
  16. Simionato A, Pecho OE, Della Bona A. Efficacy of color discrimination tests used in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33:865-873. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12673
  17. Samra AP, Moro MG, Mazur RF, Vieira S, De Souza EM, Freire A, et al. Performance of dental students in shade matching: impact of training. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:E24-E32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12287
  18. Clary JA, Ontiveros JC, Cron SG, Paravina RD. Influence of light source, polarization, education, and training on shade matching quality. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:91-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.008
  19. Garg A, Raura N, Arora A, Shenoy R, Thomas M. Effect of ocular dominance, clinical experience, and sex on the accuracy of shade selection. Quintessence Int 2022;53:320-327.
  20. Costa MF, Ventura DF, Perazzolo F, Murakoshi M, Silveira LC. Absence of binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning effects in color discrimination. Vis Neurosci 2006;23:461-469. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095252380623311X
  21. Opper JK, Volbrecht VJ. Binocular vs. monocular hue perception. Vision Res 2017;131:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.11.007
  22. Imbery TA, Tran D, Baechle MA, Hankle JL, Janus C. Dental shade matching and value discernment abilities of first-year dental students. J Prosthodont 2018;27:821-827. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12781