Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of dentin roughening and type of composite material on the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: an in vivo study with 18 months of follow-up

  • Sanjana Verma (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JCD Dental College) ;
  • Rakesh Singla (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JCD Dental College) ;
  • Gurdeep Singh Gill (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JCD Dental College) ;
  • Namita Jain (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JCD Dental College)
  • Received : 2022.12.26
  • Accepted : 2023.03.31
  • Published : 2023.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of dentin roughening and the type of composite resin used (either bulk-fill flowable or nanohybrid) on the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) with an 18-month follow-up period. Materials and Methods: This prospective split-mouth study included 36 patients, each with a minimum of 4 NCCLs. For each patient, 4 types of restorations were performed: unroughened dentin with nanohybrid composite, unroughened dentin with bulk-fill flowable composite, roughened dentin with nanohybrid composite, and roughened dentin with bulk-fill flowable composite. A universal bonding agent (Tetric N Bond Universal) was applied in self-etch mode for all groups. The restorations were subsequently evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months in accordance with the criteria set by the FDI World Dental Federation. Inferential statistics were computed using the Friedman test, with the level of statistical significance established at 0.05. Results: The 4 groups exhibited no significant differences in relation to fracture and retention, marginal staining, marginal adaptation, postoperative hypersensitivity, or the recurrence of caries at any follow-up point. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, over an 18-month follow-up period, no significant difference was present in the clinical performance of bulk-fill flowable and nanohybrid composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. This held true regardless of whether dentin roughening was performed.

Keywords

References

  1. Medeiros TL, Mutran SC, Espinosa DG, do Carmo Freitas Faial K, Pinheiro HH, D'Almeida Couto RS. Prevalence and risk indicators of non-carious cervical lesions in male footballers. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:215.
  2. Teixeira DN, Thomas RZ, Soares PV, Cune MS, Gresnigt MM, Slot DE. Prevalence of noncarious cervical lesions among adults: a systematic review. J Dent 2020;95:103285.
  3. Heintze SD, Ruffieux C, Rousson V. Clinical performance of cervical restorations--a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2010;26:993-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.06.003
  4. Szesz A, Parreiras S, Martini E, Reis A, Loguercio A. Effect of flowable composites on the clinical performance of non-carious cervical lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2017;65:11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.007
  5. Karan K, Yao X, Xu C, Wang Y. Chemical profile of the dentin substrate in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2009;25:1205-1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.04.006
  6. Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, Reis A, Munoz MA. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 2018;69:60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.011
  7. van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000;16:285-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00019-1
  8. van Dijken JW. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up. J Dent 2005;33:541-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.015
  9. Luhrs AK, Jacker-Guhr S, Gunay H, Herrmann P. Composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions-which cavity preparation is clinically reliable? Clin Exp Dent Res 2020;6:558-567. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.310
  10. Rocha AC, Da Rosa W, Cocco AR, Da Silva AF, Piva E, Lund RG. Influence of surface treatment on composite adhesion in non-carious cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent 2018;43:508-519. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-086-L
  11. Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S. Meta-analysis of the influence of bonding parameters on the clinical outcome of tooth-colored cervical restorations. J Adhes Dent 2015;17:391-403.
  12. van Dijken JW. A prospective 8-year evaluation of a mild two-step self-etching adhesive and a heavily filled two-step etch-and-rinse system in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2010;26:940-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.009
  13. Loguercio AD, Raffo J, Bassani F, Balestrini H, Santo D, do Amaral RC, et al. 24-Month clinical evaluation in non-carious cervical lesions of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive applied using a rubbing motion. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:589-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0408-8
  14. Luque-Martinez I, Munoz MA, Mena-Serrano A, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effect of EDTA conditioning on cervical restorations bonded with a self-etch adhesive: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dent 2015;43:1175-1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.013
  15. Zander-Grande C, Amaral RC, Loguercio AD, Barroso LP, Reis A. Clinical performance of one-step self-etch adhesives applied actively in cervical lesions: 24-month clinical trial. Oper Dent 2014;39:228-238. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-286-C
  16. Luque-Martinez IV, Mena-Serrano A, Munoz MA, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effect of bur roughness on bond to sclerotic dentin with self-etch adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2013;38:39-47. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-390-L
  17. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990;69:1240-1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301
  18. Ichim IP, Schmidlin PR, Li Q, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions Part II. Restorative material selection to minimise fracture. Dent Mater 2007;23:1562-1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.002
  19. Vildosola P, Nakouzi J, Rodriguez S, Reyes A, Reyes J, Conejeros C. Six-month follow-up of two Bulk-fill composites in non-carious cervical lesions: double blind randomized clinical trial. J Oral Res 2019;8:210-219. https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2019.032
  20. Canali GD, Ignacio SA, Rached RN, Souza EM. One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:889-897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2509-8
  21. Correia A, Jurema A, Andrade MR, Borges A, Bresciani E, Caneppele T. Clinical evaluation of noncarious cervical lesions of different extensions restored with bulk-fill or conventional resin composite: preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2020;45:E11-E20. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-256-C
  22. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:725-733. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0268
  23. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD Jr, Bayne SC, May KN Jr, et al. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001;29:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00050-6
  24. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:349-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8
  25. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, et al. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:749-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.013
  26. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material. J Dent 2012;40:1060-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.017
  27. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2010;38:191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.10.003
  28. Femiano F, Femiano R, Femiano L, Festa V, Rullo R, Perillo L. Noncarious cervical lesions: correlation between abfraction and wear facets in permanent dentition. Open J Stomatol 2015;5:152-157. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2015.56021
  29. Takehara J, Takano T, Akhter R, Morita M. Correlations of noncarious cervical lesions and occlusal factors determined by using pressure-detecting sheet. J Dent 2008;36:774-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.009
  30. Kwong SM, Cheung GS, Kei LH, Itthagarun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR, et al. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 2002;18:359-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00051-3
  31. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent 2004;32:173-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.009
  32. Tay FR, Kwong SM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Yip HK, Moulding KM, et al. Bonding of a self-etching primer to non-carious cervical sclerotic dentin: interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile bond strength evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:9-28.
  33. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological characterization of the interface between resin and sclerotic dentine. J Dent 1994;22:141-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90197-X
  34. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. Clinical evaluation of an all-inone adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent 2008;33:370-378. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-128
  35. Ruschel VC, Shibata S, Stolf SC, Chung Y, Baratieri LN, Heymann HO, et al. Eighteen-month clinical study of universal adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2018;43:241-249. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-320-C
  36. Zanatta RF, Silva TM, Esper M, Bresciani E, Goncalves S, Caneppele T. Bonding performance of simplified adhesive systems in non carious cervical lesions at 2-year follow-up: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2019;44:476-487. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-049-C
  37. Cruz J, Silva AL, Eira R, Coito C, Sousa BR, Lopes MM, et al. 24-month clinical performance of a universal adhesive on non-carious cervical lesions: self-etch and etch-and-rinse techniques. J Adhes Dent 2021;23:379-387.
  38. Rouse MA, May JT, Platt JA, Cook NB, Capin OR, Adams BN, et al. Clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:691-698. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12622
  39. Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JO. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2015;43:1229-1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009
  40. de Paris Matos T, Perdigao J, de Paula E, Coppla F, Hass V, Scheffer RF, et al. Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: a randomized double-blind trial. Dent Mater 2020;36:1474-1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.007