Journal of Environmental Science International (한국환경과학회지)

The Korean Environmental Sciences Society (한국환경과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Weight Analysis of Environmental Resources in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province through Expert Survey

전문가 설문을 통한 제주특별자치도 환경자원 가중치 분석에 관한 연구

  • Jung-Young Seo (Department of Horticulture &Landscape Architecture, Andong Science College)
  • 서정영 (안동과학대학교 원예조경과 )
  • Received : 2023.08.28
  • Accepted : 2023.11.08
  • Published : 2023.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to lay the foundation for considering the qualitative aspects of environmental resources by calculating the weight of each environmental resource to calculate the total amount of environmental resources in Jeju. By comparing and analyzing the results of the expert survey conducted in 2011 and the results of the expert survey conducted in 2011 and 2022, changes in experts' perceptions and implications over time were derived. In addition, based on the results of the recent survey, the weight according to the relative importance was calculated to lay the foundation for calculating the total amount of environmental resources in Jeju. The results of this study are expected to provide basic data necessary for the successful institutionalization of the total environmental resource system by providing a scientific basis for the calculation of the total environmental resource. As a result of comparing the survey conducted in 2011 to the survey conducted in 2022 to establish a total environmental resource management plan in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, there was a difference in the relative importance of the environmental resource category. Although the ranking between categories did not change, it was confirmed that the relative importance of the natural and local resource environment decreased and the relative importance of the living environment field increased significantly. Over time, the importance of plants and wildlife increased, the importance of landscapes and topographic geology decreased, the importance of wetlands and caves increased, and the importance of Gotjawal, natural monuments, and cultural history decreased. In the living environment category, the importance of water pollution increased significantly, and in the humanities and social environment category, the importance of population increased and the importance of industry decreased. It is judged that most changes in item importance are largely influenced by changes in the background of the times and overall perception. It was confirmed that the importance of plants, wildlife, wetlands, and caves with relatively high awareness and the importance of water pollution, which is emerging as a regional problem, have all increased significantly due to structural problems of population age.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, U. S., Sohn, Y. K., Kang, S. S., Jeon, Y. M., Choi, H. S., 2015, The major causes of Gotjawal formation in Jeju Island. JGSK, 51(1), 1-19.  https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2015.51.1.1
  2. Bregman, T. P., Sekercioglu, C. H., Tobias, J. A., 2014, Global patterns and predictors of bird species responses to forest fragmentation: implications for ecosystem function and conservation, Biological Conservation, 169, 372-383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.024
  3. Jeju Island, 2015, Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Environmental Conservation Mid-Term Basic Plan 
  4. Jeju Island, 2020, The 2nd Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Environmental Preservation Basic Plan(2021~2030). 
  5. Jeon, S. W., 2011, Jeju environmental resource capacity calculation and utilization, Cheju development review, 15, 53-76. 
  6. Jeong, K. J., 2017, An Investigation of the Landscape Characteristics and Value of Gotjawal in Jeju, Hisculgeo, 29(3), 58-77. 
  7. Kang, J. Y., 2018, Establishment of total environmental resource management system and future tasks, jeju research institute Policy issue brief, 302, 3-11. 
  8. Kim, G. H., Ko, S. H., 2008, A Study on the Demand Forecast of Marin Tourism in Jeju Is land, JTIR, 23, 19-42. 
  9. Liu, J., Wilson, M., Hu, G., Liu, J., Wu, J., Yu, M., 2018, How does habitat fragmentation affect the biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relationship?. Landscape ecology, 33, 341-352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0620-5
  10. Lee, S. J., Lee, S. B., Cha, E. J., Yoon, E. J., 2020, Institutional Alternatives for Effective Total Natural Resource Conservation. KEI. 
  11. OECD, 2016, Biodiversity Offsets: Effective Design and Implementation, OECD Publishing. 
  12. Yang, J., Lee, H., 1997, An AHP decision model for facility location selection, Facilities, 15(9), 241-254.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02632779710178785
  13. Wang, X., Cheng, Z., 2020, Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65-S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012