DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Three-dimensional evaluation of the pharyngeal airway space in patients with anterior open bite

  • Seong-Sik Kim (Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, and Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yong-Il Kim (Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, and Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Soo-Byung Park (Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, and Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Sung-Hun Kim (Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, and Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.26
  • 심사 : 2022.11.18
  • 발행 : 2023.11.25

초록

Objective: This study aimed to three-dimensionally evaluate the pharyngeal airway space (PAS) of patients with anterior open bite (AOB) by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and compare the findings with those obtained in individuals with normal occlusion. Methods: The open bite group (OBG, n = 25) consisted of patients with an anterior overbite of -3 mm or less, while the control group (n = 25) consisted of age- and sex-matched individuals with an anterior overbite of 1-3 mm, Angle Class I malocclusion (1° ≤ point A-nasion-point B angle ≤ 4°), and a normodivergent profile (22° ≤ Frankfort mandibular plane angle ≤ 28°). After the CBCT data were reconstructed into a three-dimensional image, the PAS was segmented into four parts, and the volume of each part was measured. Pharyngeal airway length (PAL) and the area and transverse width of the part showing minimal constriction were also measured. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between changes in the PAS and the amount of anterior overbite. Results: The OBG showed a significantly narrower airway space in the nasopharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and total airway volumes. The OBG also showed a significantly smaller area and transverse width of the part with minimal constriction. The OBG showed a significantly longer PAL, but there was no correlation between the amount of anterior overbite and the changes in PAS. Conclusions: The PAS was associated with AOB. Patients with AOB had a narrower PAS and a smaller part showing minimal constriction.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by a 2-year research grant of Pusan National University.

참고문헌

  1. McNamara JA. Influence of respiratory pattern on craniofacial growth. Angle Orthod 1981;51:269-300. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6947703/
  2. Rubin RM. Mode of respiration and facial growth. Am J Orthod 1980;78:504-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90301-2
  3. Subtelny JD, Sakuda M. Open-bite: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod 1964;50:337-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(64)90175-7
  4. Gershater MM. The proper perspective of open bite. Angle Orthod 1972;42:263-72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4504544/
  5. Gois EG, Vale MP, Paiva SM, Abreu MH, Serra-Negra JM, Pordeus IA. Incidence of malocclusion between primary and mixed dentitions among Brazilian children. A 5-year longitudinal study. Angle Orthod 2012;82:495-500. https://doi.org/10.2319/033011-230.1
  6. Greenlee GM, Huang GJ, Chen SS, Chen J, Koepsell T, Hujoel P. Stability of treatment for anterior open-bite malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:154-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.019
  7. Leavy KM, Cisneros GJ, LeBlanc EM. Malocclusion and its relationship to speech sound production: redefining the effect of malocclusal traits on sound production. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150:116-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.015
  8. Lagana G, Di Fazio V, Paoloni V, Franchi L, Cozza P, Lione R. Geometric morphometric analysis of the palatal morphology in growing subjects with skeletal open bite. Eur J Orthod 2019;41:258-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy055
  9. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mucedero M, Polimeni A. Sucking habits and facial hyperdivergency as risk factors for anterior open bite in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:517-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.032
  10. Laranjo F, Pinho T. Cephalometric study of the upper airways and dentoalveolar height in open bite patients. Int Orthod 2014;12:467-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2014.10.005
  11. Lagravere MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:112-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.024
  12. Muto T, Takeda S, Kanazawa M, Yamazaki A, Fujiwara Y, Mizoguchi I. The effect of head posture on the pharyngeal airway space (PAS). Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:579-83. https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0279
  13. Schendel SA, Jacobson R, Khalessi S. Airway growth and development: a computerized 3-dimensional analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:2174-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.10.013
  14. Pandis N. Sample calculations for comparison of 2 means. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:519-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.010
  15. Claudino LV, Mattos CT, Ruellas AC, Sant' Anna EF. Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:799-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.015
  16. Weissheimer A, Menezes LM, Sameshima GT, Enciso R, Pham J, Grauer D. Imaging software accuracy for 3-dimensional analysis of the upper airway. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:801-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.015
  17. Shintani T, Asakura K, Kataura A. Evaluation of the role of adenotonsillar hypertrophy and facial morphology in children with obstructive sleep apnea. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1997;59:286-91. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276955
  18. Venetikidou A. Incidence of malocclusion in asthmatic children. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1993;17:89-94. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8466846/
  19. Mayer P, Pepin JL, Bettega G, Veale D, Ferretti G, Deschaux C, et al. Relationship between body mass index, age and upper airway measurements in snorers and sleep apnoea patients. Eur Respir J 1996;9:1801-9. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.96.09091801
  20. Brasil DM, Kurita LM, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F. Relationship of craniofacial morphology in 3-dimensional analysis of the pharynx. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:683-91.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.021
  21. Alves PV, Zhao L, O'Gara M, Patel PK, Bolognese AM. Three-dimensional cephalometric study of upper airway space in skeletal class II and III healthy patients. J Craniofac Surg 2008;19:1497-507. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31818972ef
  22. Ucar FI, Uysal T. Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with Class I malocclusion and different growth patterns. Angle Orthod 2011;81:460-8. https://doi.org/10.2319/091910-545.1
  23. Torres HM, Evangelista K, Torres EM, Estrela C, Figueiredo PTS, Valladares-Neto J, et al. Comparison of dimensions of the nasopharynx and oropharynx using different anatomical references: is there equivalence? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:2545-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.07.008
  24. Aboudara C, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher D. Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:468-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.043
  25. ElShebiny T, Morcos S, El H, Palomo JM. Comparing different software packages for measuring the oropharynx and minimum cross-sectional area. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2022;161:228-37.e32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.024
  26. Zimmerman JN, Lee J, Pliska BT. Reliability of upper pharyngeal airway assessment using dental CBCT: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2017;39:489-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw079